Government exempts multiple crown reports



[ad_1]

mp-stories-top widget

What is the risk of infection in the reopening of schools? Do the municipalities lack the capacity to handle the virus? Does Norway have enough infection control equipment? What are the consequences of the government’s coronation measures for the health system?

These are some of the cases about the crown crisis that the government, the ministries and the Health Directorate have excluded in public in recent weeks. This despite the fact that the Constitution establishes that “everyone has the right to access the documents of the state and the municipalities.”

Now the government is receiving increasing criticism that the opening that characterized Norway in the first days after the country’s closure has ended.

“For the sake of internal processing”

Many of the most important crown cases in Norway are dealt with by the government’s covid-19 selection and the biological preparedness emergency preparedness committee.

Most of the notes to the covid-19 committee are public.

In the first few weeks, the media gained access to reports from the Emergency Preparedness Committee on biological events. But the minutes of April 2, a few days after the government changed its strategy, are exempt from the public “for the sake of national security or the defense of the country.”

The complaint was also rejected because the Ministry believed that it could be exempted anyway “for the sake of internal preparation of the case.”

– I am very concerned that the emergency committee actually acts as an emergency committee to deal with the crisis. We totally depend on it. Then there will always be the type of evaluations, while other times it will be public, says Health Minister Bent Høie.

The opposition in Storting criticized the government last week when NRK spoke about how a report on society’s most vulnerable children was held for nine days.

The central reports are kept secret by the government. The election is labeled as unsustainable and unconstitutional.

Long list of items that are exempt from advertising.

In recent weeks there have been many rejections of Aftenposten and other media from the ministries and the government. Here are some examples of matters that are exempt from the public:

  • The daily status reports that the Health Directorate sends to the administration are secret with reference to “internal case preparation” and “national defense and security interests.”
  • An FHI letter on “Infectious Risk of Opening High Schools” to the Ministry on April 20 was exempt from the public. “To guarantee solid internal decision-making processes.”
  • A note on “the ability of municipalities to cope with the coronavirus” was excluded from the public because “the document has been prepared for internal processing ».
  • When Health South-East wrote a letter on “The evidence situation in Norway: how to increase it?”, The case was exempt from publicity by the Directorate to guarantee “adequately safeguard the public interest
  • The FHI statement “on the work on the management of the coronavirus 31.1.2020”, which sheds light on how the coronavirus was initially managed, is exempt from publicity by the Ministry “by internal case processing
  • Figures on “loss of health due to Covid-19 suppressing other health service activity” were excluded from advertising “for the sake of good protection of the public interest

Publishers Association: – A terrifying political signal

“Several key documents, with important premises for the crown measures to be implemented and the effects of the measures, absolutely vital information to the public, are exempt from public knowledge,” writes Secretary-General Arne Jensen of the Norwegian Publishers Association. in an article in Aftenposten.

The crisis of the crown pressures the freedom of the press | Arne jensen

“It is not in line with the intent of the law, and it is also a terrifying political signal.”

He responds that the constitutional right to attend court meetings is violated and that, in practice, the press has been prohibited from following key parts of the crown crisis, such as reporting from hospitals. Only last week the media let in.

“It is in crisis that we have to document that our principles are strong enough to also survive a state of emergency,” writes Jensen.

The Civil Ombudsman now handles several complaints about media secrecy.

Prime Minister: – Strongly disagree

During the press conference on May 7 on the reopening of Norway, Prime Minister Erna Solberg said she strongly disagrees that the government has not shown sufficient transparency.

“Of course, we will practice the most public,” said Prime Minister Erna Solberg.

– All the decision documents that are the basis for this, for example, have been opened from now on. But when we are in a decision-making process before the government takes a position, where we talk to the different people who have advised us and where we get a lot of different advice from different parties, then it is quite common for us to wait until this be done, said Solberg.

– We have had a full discussion with different researchers and different staff and politicians about the correct strategy, if the measures really work and the differences between them.

At the same time, the Prime Minister believes that it has been “a challenge” when meetings in courts, municipalities and presidencies take place digitally.

– We have rapidly digitized Norwegian society to do as much work as possible. So not everything is perfect.

[ad_2]