Nintendo argues that Joy-Con drift in class-action lawsuits ‘not a real problem’


Nintendo has reportedly argued that the Joy-Con attitude in class-action against the company is “not a real problem” and “did not inconvenience anyone.”

The information came from an email update sent by Chemicals Schwartz Kriner and Donaldson-Smith LLP, a law firm representing people affected by the report’s Joy-Con attitude.

Thanks for the redditter Mittencone, E-mail with request has been disclosed. Posted by Mitnescon on Subtradit r / NintendoSwitchHere is the e-mail (errors and all):

“Thank you for contacting our law firm regarding the Nintendo Switch Joy-Con Drift lawsuit. You’re working to put together a montage of video clips from Nintendo Switch owners as a way to voice the fun-con drift issues you’ve experienced. This will help us to answer Nintendo’s arguments about how this is not a real problem or has caused any inconvenience to anyone.

In an effort to humanize and demonstrate these issues and their impact on consumers, if you submit a short (90 seconds or less) video to describe your experience with Joy-Con Drift, it will be helpful in our handling of the case. Your controllers. You can record it on your phone and email us a video. We will link all the videos of clients who have contacted us, which we plan to share with Nintendo’s attorneys and company representatives. If applicable, the video should describe the following:

  • Start identifying why you originally purchased the Switch, or any relevant details about your background as a longtime Nintendo fan (if applicable).
  • Describe all the problems or issues related to the drift problem on your Joy Con controllers.
  • If you have had a lot of repairs and have had to contact Nintendo many times, please explain if it was successful in the end. Please provide any details about how much time you spent on the phone with them, how many replacement joy cons you received, and if any of them failed again (and if so).
  • If you want Nintendo to know how this has affected your trust in the Nintendo brand or if you are likely to buy a Nintendo product again and again, you are free to express those feelings.

Please submit your video to NintendoClosureક્શનchimicles.com by Friday, October 16th. Please let us know if you have any questions.

Thanks in advance for your time and attention. “

There is a special line to grab everyone’s attention: “This will help us to answer Nintendo’s arguments. This is not a real problem Or Didn’t cause any inconvenience to anyone

Those who have had to send their Joy-cons for repairs (and before paying for them “Free repairs“Revenge) and wait a week to get their controllers, they will beg about that defense.

Why Chemicals wants testimonials is due to the current state of the case. The judge overseeing the trial declared that it would be decided by arbitration – where both parties would present an argument to a third-party that would decide. Generally, these third-party (arbitrators) are considered lawyers, retired judges, or “experts” in their field.

To present a strong crime, the best approach is to collect as many witnesses as possible and disclose their first-hand accounts.

With over 61 million Nintendo Switch units sold, there are a lot of stories that could lead arbitrators to find Nintendo at fault and possibly lead to a Joy-Con redesign.

For now, Chemicals is accepting for the next two weeks. If you want to read more about the case, you can visit Chimikls Website As well as devoted to litigation Previous coverage Here on the Nintendo Wire.