LAS VEGAS (AP) – A state judge has heard arguments about Donald Trump’s campaign to declare the president the winner of the election in Nevada or to annul the results and block the state’s six democratically elected candidates. . Just vote for Biden.
Leading the challenge on behalf of the six Republican representatives in the Electoral College ledge, Attorney Jesse Binnal insisted that there were many fraudulent votes, mainly in the Las Vegas area, that Trump won the state – not Biden.
“Some obvious fraud, some irregularity. The vote should not be counted, “Binnal said during a two-hour hearing before Judge James T. Russell in Carson City.
Russell said he would present his decision on Friday to give the state’s Supreme Court time to appeal before the results are finalized on Dec. 14 by the nationwide Electoral College Ledger.
The arguments, broadcast by video and telephone, came more than a week after seven Nevada judges certified Nevada’s election results as official.
Biden won by 33,596 votes, about 2.4% of the 1.4 million votes cast across the state. In the Las Vegas area, Biden won by 9.35%.
Binnell said he has an expert who can show that approximately 87,000 invalid or illegal votes were cast and that “most of the problem came from Clark County.”
Kevin Hamilton, a National Democratic Party election campaigner representing Nevada’s six Biden voters, said, “There is no evidence of an illegal vote. This is a trial by accusation, not evidence.”
“This election was fair, the votes were counted properly and if Biden won. “It’s time for competitors to accept that,” Hamilton said, adding that the Nevada case is one of the many futile challenges introduced in states around the US presidential war.
Binnell accused election officials in Nevada of trying to block anonymous GOP “whistleblowers” who said that the “attorney” who gave clear evidence was lacking in transparency because things were taken so fast. Was stolen. ”
Russell had previously called witnesses after Binnell expressed concern for his safety.
In written filings, attorneys linked the Biden campaign to voting in at least six Indian communities around Nevada, saying voters illegally receive valuables – gifts and gas cards, raffle entries and T-shirts – in exchange for “polling stations and their votes.” . ”
The Nevada Native Vote Project dismissed that account as “clearly false” and branded assumptions that members of the nonpartisan advocacy group had given Biden the product of “op-ed and racist investigations.”
Hamilton told the judge that Binnal’s claims were “dramatically short-lived rather than symbolic” because the Democratic Party’s attorney dismissed the Nevada president’s request as “unprecedented and credible.”
Binnell said his expert – Republican National Political Data Analyst Jesse Kamzol – identified the vote by more than 19,000 as “non-negotiable;” About 24,000 people who did not live said they did; More than 1,500 dead voters; And more than 42,000 “double votes.”
At the same time, the issue is more than a press conference between Vice President Biden and President Trump, Binnal said of the latest figures.
Hamilton said there was no way of knowing which candidate received the allegedly tarnished ballot. He said Binnal’s claims were not clear enough to say who voted twice, whether the dead voted or who voted after leaving the state.
Hamilton challenged Kamzol’s credentials as an expert, but the judge said he wanted to hear Binnal’s evidence.
Binnell also cited the accounts of the man referred to as “Dr. 1” in court records who said the length of the Las Vegas-area vote was changed to a laptop using an encrypted disk.
“Suddenly at night, the votes were appearing and the votes were disappearing on these machines … without explanation,” Binnal said.
Hamilton ended up protesting that the court had allowed Binnal to run for office since the election case was filed on November 17, accepting 15 testimonies, including anonymous testimony, and allowing him to examine sealed election materials. He mocked Binnal’s findings.
“They make a large number of offers,” Hamilton told the judge, “but without support, without a name, and without evidence of a certain illegal vote. Not one.”
.
