NASA renames cosmic objects with ‘insensitive’ nicknames

Many cosmic objects are known to scientists by unofficial nicknames, but not all of these nicknames are created equal. As it turns out, some are directly offensive.

NASA is working to change this by evaluating the nicknames that are currently in use and making changes to those that are insensitive.

There has been a general trend lately towards inclusivity and wrongdoing from the past, and NASA is taking action.

In a statement posted on NASA.gov, the agency explained its reason for changing the way they refer to these cosmic features whose names are problematic:

“While the scientific community is working to identify and address systemic discrimination and inequality in all aspects of the field, it has become clear that certain cosmic nicknames are not only insensitive, but can be actively harmful.”

“NASA is exploring its use of unofficial terminology for cosmic objects as part of its commitment to diversity, equality, and inclusion.”

Among those called problematic is NGC 2392, a planetary nebula whose nickname includes a term for the indigenous peoples of the Arctic Circle who find many offensive.

The Associate Director of NASA’s Science Mission Directorate at Headquarters, Thomas Zurbuchen, talked a bit about why change is important.

“I support our ongoing revaluation of the names by which we refer to astronomical objects. Our goal is for all names to conform to our values ​​of diversity and inclusion, and we will proactively work with the scientific community to ensure that.”

“Science is for everyone, and every facet of our work must reflect that value.”

NASA will partner with “diversity, inclusion and equity experts in the astronomical and physical sciences” to monitor other nicknames and make changes where appropriate.

Unfortunately, much of the reaction to NASA’s announcement on social media seems to be people who insist that change is unnecessary and that NASA simply borders on ‘awake culture’.

It’s probably safe to say that these people have never tried to learn about astronomy, only to encounter a celestial object whose name contains a racial right used against its people.

Stephen T. Shih, associate manager for diversity and equal opportunity at NASA headquarters, also recognized the need for change.

“These nicknames and terms may have historical or cultural connotations that are offensive or unwelcome, and NASA is strongly committed to addressing them.”

“Science depends on different contributions, and benefits everyone, so this means we have to make it inclusive.”

Inclusivity creates, by its nature, opportunities and encompasses differences and strengths of people. It costs nothing to change an offensive name, and is a great first step in making science more accessible to everyone.