Nancy Pelosi says Trump is in a ‘hurry’ to confirm Barrett so he can invalidate Obamacare


“Anything I’m worried about is that President Trump would have given it to undo the Affordable Care Act. That’s why they were in such a hurry, so they have verbal arguments from someone, starting November 10,” Pelosi told CNN’s Jack Tapper. Said on “State the Union”.

“And it doesn’t matter what the process is here, what it means for the American people, it doesn’t matter,” Pelosi said, adding that she would have placed a number of things at stake if Obamacare was overturned by the High Court. .

“If you have an existing medical condition, it will be an advantage. If you are a woman, we will return to the time where being a woman is a medical condition. If your children are on your policy – you say adult children. It’s up to your policy – they won’t be there anymore, and in times of epidemics, “he said.

On Saturday, Trump nominated Amy Connie Barrett for the next Supreme Court justice. Which may come next. High court. If confirmed, Barrett will help strengthen an at-3 majority in court.

Trump said in a tweet on Sunday that it would be a “big win” for the country if the court struck down the ACA.

“Obamacare will be better replaced, and cheaper, alternative if he is eliminated in the Supreme Court. There will be a big win for the USA!” He wrote without giving details.

Tapper was asked if she was also a potential -3–3 convincing majority court. May overturn Wade’s decision, Pelosi said his current concern is related to the fate of the healthcare law he helped pass 10 years ago.

“What’s on the table right now is a court case that has advocated overthrowing Republicans – the Affordable Care Act. It’s the same case on the table in the Supreme Court. So our concern is that,” said the California Democrat.

The Senate will be put on track for a quick confirmation of modern history under pressure to uphold the Supreme Court’s justice before the November 3 election.

Barrett, who is currently in the U.S. Circuit Court App is a judge of appeals, giving an insight into his views on the ACA in his preliminary law review essay on the ACA, in which he reviewed a book on the Supreme Court’s judgment on the law, in which he criticized the Chief Justice. The logic of John Roberts who defended the law in 2012.

“Chief Justice Roberts pushed the Affordable Care Act beyond the meaning of sustainable law to protect the law,” Barrett wrote. “He described the fines imposed on people without health insurance as a tax, which allowed them to uphold the law as a valid exercise of tax-paying power.”

In the second stage, Barrett refers to “Roberts’ devotion to constitutional disregard.”

The personal order of the case law that is to be heard by the Republican state attorney general and the judges who are to be heard after the election is brought by a coalition by the Trump administration is unconstitutional, and the whole law must fall.

This story has been updated with more details.

Claire Four of CNN contributed to this report.

.