Meghan Markle, 38, and Prince Harry, 35, announced their plans to leave the Royal Family in January through an Instagram post. But biographer Nigel Cawthorne has said in unsubstantiated claims that Prince Charles and Prince William leaked details of their departure plans after Prince Andrew’s appearance on BBC Newsnight. Royal commentators Rachel Bowie and Roberta Fiorito refused to believe the outrageous claims as they discussed the relationship between royalty.
Speaking on the Royally Obsessed podcast, Fiorito said: “There is a rumor that Prince Charles and / or Prince William were the ones who arranged the timing of Harry and Meghan’s departure.
“Why the hell would Harry’s father want him to leave the family?
“I don’t think it’s possible.
“The background to this is biographer Nigel Cawthorne’s new book ‘Prince Andrew, Epstein and the Palace’, there are some rather explosive claims to say that Charles and William’s teams at the Palace decided to use the timing of the Prince’s disastrous interview Andrew BBC Newsnight for begin to leak stories that Harry and Meghan were about to leave their roles.
READ MORE: Prince Philip was caught driving while Duke gets behind the wheel during the blockade
“I suppose those leaks eventually sparked crisis talks organized by the Queen.
“I don’t see why this is a rumor and I think Harry and Meghan made it clear that it was their choice.”
Co-host Bowie added: “Prince Charles and Prince William love Harry and Meghan.”
Ms. Fiorito also noted: “Any bridge that has been burned appears to have been repaired, at least in public view.”
It occurs when leaked court documents say Meghan was “unprotected by the Institution” when she was attacked by the media and “prohibited from defending herself,” according to leaked court documents.
The documents are part of Meghan’s legal action against the editor of the Mail on Sunday and MailOnline over articles featuring parts of a “private and confidential” letter from the Duchess to her father Thomas Markle.
Meghan seeks damages for alleged misuse of private information, copyright infringement, and breach of the Data Protection Act.
The Associated Newspapers totally denies the allegations and says it will dispute the case.
In the documents, seen by the AP news agency, the duchess’s five friends who spoke in an American publication criticizing her father, are not named but referred to as AE, although they are identified in an undisclosed confidential schedule.
And the newspapers claim that the duchess’s royal wedding generated tourism revenue of more than a billion pounds for the public pocket.
DO NOT MISS
Meghan Markle and Prince Harry STILL receive money from Charles [INSIGHT]
Kate sends real fans into a frenzy when they notice a surprising change [ANALYSIS]
Prince Harry’s royal quarrel with ‘callous’ brother William will erupt [INTERVIEW]
The court documents read: “The Claimant had become the subject of a large number of false and damaging articles in the UK tabloid media, specifically the Defendant, which caused her great emotional distress and damage to her mental health.
“Since her friends had never seen her in this state before, they were justly concerned about her well-being, specifically because she was pregnant, unprotected by the institution, and prohibited from defending herself.”
Meghan’s five close friends, with her friend A personally known to Markle for more than 20 years, were interviewed but not named in a People magazine article, something Meghan was not involved in, according to the newspapers.
In the article, published in February last year, they spoke out against the intimidation they said royalty has faced.
