[ad_1]
1 photoSigismund Pavilionis. Photo of Elta
“We have already registered that we will express our support (to Ž. Pavilionis – ELTA) without participating in the vote and we will not give in to the provocateurs who seek to confuse the life of the state,” Elvila Radvilė Morkūnaitė-Mikulėnienė, the largest of the conservative faction in the Seimas. According to her, probably the entire majority cleaning in Tuesday’s procedure in Ž. The fate of the pavilion will not participate.
Meanwhile, the opposition not only does not express the fears of the ruling leaders who raise Ž. At the pavilion post office, the question is simply handed over to the provocateurs, but there are also suspicions about the intentions not to participate in the secret ballot. In this way, says Aušrinė Norkienė, the largest of the “peasant” faction in the Seimas, the rulers are trying to hide the fact that they are not satisfied with the road Ž. Pavilion.
“Surprisingly, the Conservatives and the current ruling majority are defending the chairman of the committee by not allowing him to go to the polls. I think we shouldn’t be afraid if everyone is convinced that this is the right chair for such a commission. We offer a procedure: come and show that you will. I understand the easiest way is to ban it. But is it democracy? “A. Norkienė told Eltai, suspecting that there were opinions about Ž among the ruling ranks. The pavilion is diverse.
“The opinions of the ruling majority are different, so the decision not to participate in the vote shows that not all representatives of the majority would support Sigismund Pavilionis to remain in this position,” said the farmer.
Finally, he argued that it was not just history when Ž. The flag fell into the traps of the Russian provocateurs, it is a pretext to declare mistrust in the president of the CEC.
“We asked questions after Sigismund Pavilionis’ trip to Sakartvela. But, you know, he had recently assumed the chairmanship of the committee at the time, perhaps underestimating his powers. But when we heard the content of that conversation, without even considering the circumstances themselves, he spoke there quite frankly. And that disparagement of the president as an institution … We emphasize the content of his speech rather than the provocation itself, “he said.
ELTA remembers that Ž. The pavilion has come under fire after Russian provocateurs, known by the nicknames Vovan and Lexus, posted a video in which the Kremlin’s opposition leader, Leonid Volkov, spoke on foreign policy issues. Pavilion. At the end of the edited record, Ž. Pavilionis urges the interlocutor not to pay attention to President Gitan Nausėda on foreign policy issues, which is only “symbolic”. It is Ž. Pavilionis’ statements received the most attention in the Lithuanian public space.
“You don’t pay attention (…). The prime minister thinks like me. The Foreign Minister thinks like me, we are the largest party, we have a parliamentary republic and the president is only symbolic ”Ž. Pavilion.
Although the opposition demands his resignation, the ruler Ž. Defend the flag
Representatives of the opposition factions of the Seimas last week registered a draft of censorship of the president of the CEC. According to them, trust Ž. The flag is no longer allowed due to its behavior, which, convinced by the opposition, is detrimental to parliamentary diplomacy on the part of the Seimas. The opposition claims that Ž. The pavilion was misbehaving when he went on a business trip to Sakartvele in February. According to her, the president of the URK not only thwarted the mediation mission, but also caused an international scandal through his non-diplomatic actions.
However, probably the main pretext for declaring distrust in the conservative was made public by Ž. Pavilion conversation with Russian provocateurs.
However, the ruling Ž. The pavilion is blocked on the grounds that it is not possible to enjoy a game imposed on the Kremlin by provocateurs working for the Kremlin. Skeptical leaders of the ruler also appreciate the ultimatum posed by the opposition that if Ž. The pavilion will continue to preside over the Seimas committee, with the departure of two members of the opposition: Giedrius Surplys and Antanas Vinkus, who belong to the “peasant” faction. According to Gabriel Landsberg, such actions only show that politicians “do not like to work.”
Seimas spokesman Viktorija Čmilytė-Nielsen states that in the procedure initiated by the opposition representatives in order to dismiss Ž. The pavilion is not to be visited at all. According to her, opposition politicians in their actions can set a dangerous precedent, since the procedure itself was initiated due to the provocation to which the conservative simply fell.
Ž. The flag admitted its mistake
Ž. The pavilion addressed the deputies a few weeks ago, regretting and partially acknowledging the mistakes made. The conservative, who has fallen for the traps of Russian provocateurs, admitted that he was not very careful when speaking with opposition Kremlin activist L. Volkov about what he had ambiguously agreed to in public on foreign policy and bragged about his connections. in the country Congress or German and Swedish politicians.
Although Ž. The pavilion has repeatedly pointed out that the search in public space should not be taken seriously, that it is just an informational provocation initiated by the Kremlin’s special services, but the conservative, who often does not skimp on harsh criticism of Gitan Nausėda, expressed his regret for his words.
“I am sorry if my words, even if they are false, offended someone,” the URK president told Seimas members.
[ad_2]
