[ad_1]
Delfi wrote this week about the shareholder conflict at Panevėžys Roads. V. Puidokas then asked the small shareholders of the company to concentrate, because the adoption of the new statutes required three-quarters (75%) of the votes.
“It is unfortunate that minority shareholders’ rights are significantly reduced when the bylaws are filed. We ran out of 6.5 percent when we voted on the new bylaws. Some minority shareholders also voted in favor of such a project. Apparently, he received promises, perhaps commitments to exchange shares. I don’t know, I couldn’t say why it happened, “V. Puidokas told Delfi on Friday.
A little over 4 percent. The former director of the company, who held more than 5% of the supervisory board and the board, had previously had access to all the minutes of the supervisory board and the board. Share.
“The new wording provides for more than 20 percent. The cartel has quadrupled. Another circumstance is that the access rights of large shareholders have been expanded. If the Public Limited Companies Law provides for 50 percent. And more, the shareholder with the right to access all company documents, the new draft of the new statutes lowered the cartel to 25 percent. Furthermore, not a group of shareholders, but a shareholder, “said the interlocutor.
13.85 percent also voted against the new statutes. ruler of the Balčėčiai family. This was confirmed by Audrius Balčetis from Delfi, but did not comment on the situation in more detail.
At that time, 28.63 percent. Mr Drobužas, who governed, said that the bylaws had been changed because the shareholders had confidence in what was being done.
“The future of the company is to move, work, do, think about the future. Today it is not an easy road area, turnover is doubling, so there are challenges. We hope that the responsible authorities will implement the projects that have been talked about for many years.
The company is running steadily today. There are no big questions. There is no panic, ”he commented.
Panevėžio keliai has a total of 80 shareholders. The largest are the Drobuži family, including shares in the Ioco company, which they own, with 28.63 percent. Share. In second place is Juodviršiai, who controls almost as much (28.54%). In the third, Balčėčiai with 13.85 percent. Share. Other families own about 5 percent each. “Panevėžio kelias” means Gražiai, Butkūnai, Šimoliūnai and Blažiai.
Piper JetPROP
© Wikimedia Commons
I told him about the plane
On Friday, V. Puidokas responded to some of the previous statements by G. Drobužas. For example, the former manager was accused of buying a plane on behalf of the company.
Mr. Puidokas confirmed that Piper JetPROP had in fact been purchased, but said it had been done in a responsible and transparent manner.
“Realizing that using that plane is a great responsibility, I paid special attention to the issue of transparency. Everything was paid for in full, the burden of cost was shared.
This is practiced all over the world. There is corporate property in which both natural and legal persons own the aircraft. Its cost is not small, so it is expensive for a company to have an airplane. In this case, we had three companies (Panevėžio statybos trestas, Panevėžio keliai, Keltecha) and four natural persons operating this aircraft.
Every month we share the fixed costs related to maintenance, insurance, etc. This is an exceptional example of transparency, “said V. Puidokas.
In addition, he clarified that the plane was normally at the Kaunas Aleksotas airport.
“From there we mainly fly on business trips. The advantage is that we reached our destination very quickly. For example, on the same day we flew to Sweden, did the necessary work and returned in the evening, without spending the night.
We actually got to the place really fast. The flight from Kaunas to Malmö took just over an hour. Then after 20 or 30 minutes, we could be on the premises. We really save our working time. In principle, communication hampered as much as it took to get from Panevėžys to Vilnius, ”said the interlocutor.
V. Puidokas also said that by not allowing G. Drobužas to make copies of documents, he complied with the court decision.
“I complied with a court order that ordered the company to give him access without making copies. If the execution of a sentence is a mockery of a shareholder, I have nothing to comment on. If I had let it go freely, then another shareholder would have appeared and accused me, ”he said.
V. Puidokas also responded about the other crushed stone sold by his company Panevėžio keliams: “Our company obtained resources from various suppliers. The claim that the sales were made at uncompetitive prices is completely unfounded. “
It is strictly forbidden to use the information published by DELFI on other websites, in the media or elsewhere, or to distribute our material in any way without consent, and if consent has been obtained, it is necessary to cite DELFI as the source. .
[ad_2]
