The Germans reacted to the “incredible things” of the immigrants in Lithuania: we too are to blame!



[ad_1]

“Incredible things are happening at the outer border of Europe: the Belarusian dictator transports migrants from the Middle East to his country and sends them across the border to the European Union. Full travel packages can be booked in Baghdad and Istanbul,” he said Philipp Writz, a reporter for Die Welt, who visited Kapčiamiestis and interacted with the Lithuanian border guards. The same on July 26. The newspaper also published an interview with Lithuanian Foreign Minister Gabriel Landsbergis.

From these texts welt.de readers learned that “the refugee crisis is affecting little Lithuania with its 2.8 million. and that “the government predicts that up to 6,000 immigrants will soon arrive in Lithuania in a week. This is just the beginning of the migration from the East. And if the predictions come true, Lithuania will accept more immigrants per capita in the coming weeks than Italy, which has a particularly large number of people landing on its shores. “

Lithuanians themselves are well informed about what is happening in Lithuania. And here the reaction of the German readers is really remarkable. Incidentally, Die Welt editor Stefan Aust has repeatedly praised the portal’s readers for their accurate insights. They express their views much more openly than a frequent politician suffering from political correctness or a spokesperson who resonates with the “spirit of the time.”

The Germans reacted to the

The European Union has put on the chains

Evaluating the Belarusian President’s “attack on migrants”, reader Thobias S. notes: “Lukashenko is a farmer, so he is doing rudely and openly what Putin has been doing for years. It just works just fine. in a more subtle way, without attracting attention and without applying specific measures to trigger the flow of refugees from Syria and elsewhere. “

“But the ‘farmer’ is cunning. He plays by his own rules, and the EU can’t do anything because, stunned by his humanity, he has put his own chains on him,” says Andre S.

July 28 resonates with the latest events in Lithuania. An article entitled “How Europe lost its borders” was published in a newspaper dedicated to the 70th anniversary of the Geneva Convention on Refugees. 1951 The convention, which was originally limited to post-WWII refugees and will run until 1953, gradually spread until it finally “made an unforeseen career” thanks to European law (the European Court of Human Rights ruled in Italy in 2012 to compensate migrants, returned to Libya by the Mediterranean Coast Guard), writes Klaus Geiger, head of Die Welt’s foreign affairs department.

Parallels in 2007 The European Commission has made the Convention so universal that “the EU now has the worst protected borders in the world compared to other industrialized countries and, at the same time, the most comprehensive asylum law. And national governments, wrapped in a corset of European law, can hardly maneuver ”, sums up the author of the article, while indirectly revealing the unenviable situation in which the Lithuanian government now finds itself.

Ready to sacrifice the holidays to build a fence in Lithuania

It is clear to real-minded welt.de readers that just by protecting the Community’s borders, we will not be the victims of dictators, the fate of our neighbors, blackmail or a “hybrid war”. “And if the law does not allow it, fundamental reforms are needed,” said Olaf B.

“As a member of the EU, Lithuania must fulfill its obligations. One of them is to protect the EU’s external border. Let responsible politicians come to Hungary for advice,” replies Günter O. with a scathing hint.

At the same time, readers understand that it is impossible to suddenly protect the 680 km stretch of the border with Belarus, which so far has not caused any problems. “Should Lithuania now build a border guard every 5 meters? That would require about half of the Lithuanian population,” says Volker H.

The rest of the EU would have to help Lithuania, because a small country does not have the capacity to do so, readers are convinced.

One of them, nicknamed Meinungshaber, wrote a particularly emotional comment: “When will the EU finally react to help our Lithuanian brothers and sisters? Or when 6,000 cross the border in a week, how do you fear that? The EU, especially Germany, should offer Lithuania assistance to soldiers and border guards, workers and materials to establish the border along the entire border section. And myself, instead of going on vacation for three weeks, I would help build a fence for a week. Furthermore, the EU should try to reach an agreement with Turkey and Iraq so that these countries will no longer accept any aircraft from Belarus. “

Going on a journey tempted by social temptations in Germany

“And who is to blame for this situation? We and only us with our own laws!” H. Schmidt is convinced. What does it mean for those 7,000 or 8,000 euros that you have to pay to go on a trip, if you know how much you will get for them when you arrive at your final destination in Germany?

After all, Germany guarantees a good life, even without much effort, without persistent and tireless work, readers comment. In mid-July, information released by Statistics Germany revealed that six years after the refugee crisis, up to 65 percent Syrians of working age still live on social benefits.

It is clear that the increase in migratory flows also places an increasing social burden on the taxpayers of the host country. According to sarcastic commentator Nordlicht, “everyone wants good old germany. To be able to finance all of this in the future, it’s time to raise taxes significantly, preferably for those with lower incomes, who are already forced to work so much overtime that they no longer have time to spend money. Unlike fellow newcomers. “

For Germans it is clear that Lithuania is not the target of those seeking a better life, but Germany, where they receive a full supply and an apartment. As a result, “Julius Verne’s novel” Journey to the Center of the Earth “has now taken on a completely different meaning,” says reader Nord P.

“Just turn off the MAGNET!” Urges commenter Armin X, not only. However, as long as the Danish Social Democratic government takes all possible measures to reduce economic migration, the vast majority of German politicians continue to repeat as a mantra the claim that no one leaves their homeland voluntarily.

The reluctance of intellectuals and politicians to speak openly about migration

The reader Dirk A. does not understand how the pull factor of a good life can be denied. Paul Collier, a world-renowned migration researcher and professor at the University of Oxford, has put this pull mechanism very briefly and visually: “If I moved to Norway, I could double my income. Most of the world’s population would more than double their income this way. But there is no such right (to move wherever you want – ed.) ”, Said the scientist in an interview with the Swiss newspaper Neue Züricher Zeitung exactly three years ago.

Migration is not only gathering momentum, it will accelerate in the future, Collier warns. One of the reasons for this is the diaspora, which encourages chain migration. Each newly admitted migrant attracts new compatriots.

“Migration and the refugee crisis are problems so serious that our sympathy alone will not solve them,” he said, urging politicians to think seriously “not only about the short-term economic consequences but also the long-term social consequences. term of migration “.

Intellectuals also avoid speaking openly about the sensitive issues of migration, rather than simply “repeating mantras to the population” and trying to “present migration as fundamentally positive.” The subject of migration, according to P. Collier, author of several books on the subject of migration, is so morally tense that the same intellectuals who agree with their theses in a personal conversation do not dare to do so in public.

The Rhine will freeze in July instead of the EU reacting

The desire expressed by Lithuanian Vice Chancellor Arnoldas Pranckevičius to receive a clear signal from the EU, “that we Europeans will not tolerate the instrumentalization of immigrants in the future”, says the author of the article Ph. Fritz accompanied him with the phrase: “But there is still no clear signal. “

In response, reader NoName continues: “Such a clear signal ‘would have been necessary after 2015 at the latest. And what do we get? Any! Everyone heads to the country as soon as the question of a specific answer or vote comes up. “

“When will the EU react? Rather, the Rhine will freeze already in July …” – Reader Torsten K. resigns.

As German polls, including those published in May this year, show, the majority of Germans are skeptical of migration and regard the integration of migrants as a failure. As can be seen, not all persuasion efforts on the broad media front and the desirable concept of migration “communicated” by the government are helping.

Politicians who consider how to “communicate” the problem of migration to the population of the country must remember: “communicate” means to communicate, exchange experiences and thoughts. And seriously, and not for the sake of sight, as the European Commission did exactly a year ago, it launched a survey of EU citizens on migration, but did not take the opportunity to make it public. You probably don’t even want to advertise, – said the majority of Germans who found out about the initiative in the last days of the poll and expressed bitterness at such an “alibi poll”. Lithuanians had never heard of this survey, it is possible. Because there were no reviews of Lithuania on the survey page.

The old Latin saying “Vox populi vox Dei” (literally: the voice of the people is the voice of God, which means “public opinion is the supreme will”) is probably an empty phrase for most political elites.

Finally, journalist Thomas Dudek called on European Union leaders to conclude an article on Lukashenko’s war on the EU, published in Cicero magazine on Friday: “A decisive EU-wide response is now urgently needed. Yes Due to Lithuania’s exceptional role in the Belarusian opposition, relations between Vilnius and Minsk were tense even before the refugee crisis. However, anyone who tries to explain the current refugee crisis in the Baltic States in this way alone is in the easy way. “

A similar situation may soon arise on the Polish border, warns Th. Dudekas. The author, like most welt.de readers, is well aware that, for these immigrants, “Lithuania and Poland are first and foremost transit countries on the way to the West.”

It is strictly forbidden to use the information published by DELFI on other websites, in the media or elsewhere, or to distribute our material in any way without consent, and if consent has been obtained, it is necessary to indicate DELFI as the source.



[ad_2]