[ad_1]
The conflict erupted over a photo of the 17-year-old with his classmate, Gulin’s girlfriend. Carol and the girl attended an 11th grade graduation party on the farm, showered there, and then stripped naked in bed to warm up. Someone took a photo of them and made it public on a social network.
Feeling that Gulin might not understand everything, the 17-year-old had the idea to explain to him that the situation was completely innocent. Therefore, he wrote to D. Gulin himself, sent him the same photo and offered to meet him and find out everything. Unfortunately, the meeting was very short, because when Gulin arrived, he immediately resorted to violence, after which the 17-year-old did not get up.
Relieved prayer
However, injured and it is unclear whether the parents of a teenager who will ever wake up from a coma are forced to see the triumph of Gulin today, who injured his son. The case was initially heard in the Vilnius City District Court.
This court in 2018. June 8 announced a shocking decision to the family of the injured teenager. Mr. Gulin was found guilty of serious health problems. He was even sentenced to 4 years in prison, but the court ruled that his execution should be suspended for 3 years.
It is true that D. Gulin, who avoided a real prison sentence, was forced to pay 175 thousand to his 17-year-old parents and several relatives. for non-pecuniary damages.
Both D. Gulinas and the parents of his seriously injured teenager filed appeals with the Vilnius Regional Court. D. Gulin, who pleaded guilty to the coup, asked that the probation be reduced and that non-pecuniary damage be awarded multiple times. The 17-year-old’s parents have asked Mr. Gulin to face a real prison sentence.
Vilnius Regional Court in 2019 November 25 decided to lift Mr. Gulin’s probation. He was sentenced to 2 years and 6 months in prison while serving in a correctional facility. It is true that the total non-material damage to the victims was reduced almost 3 times, to 100,000. euros
However, the decisive word in this story was spoken by the Lithuanian Supreme Court (LAT) this week. The issue of non-pecuniary damage remained unchanged, but it was decided that the punishment objectives for D. Gulin could be achieved while he was at large. Thus, in a final and unappealable order, it was decided that D. Gulin was sentenced to 2 years and 6 months, postponing the execution of the sentence for the same period.
You are also obligated not to leave the house after 10 p.m. until 6 o’clock, except in the case of work, also to not leave the city (district) of the place of residence without the permission of the institution that supervises the convict and participate in behavior correction programs during the first six months.
Infinite parental pain
The SCL’s decision was commented by Mindaugas Bliuvas, the lawyer representing the victims: “The point is that the SCL changed the parts of the court verdict precisely because of the punishment. Therefore, the actual prison sentence was abolished.
In our appeal, we ask the defendant to impose an actual prison sentence. But the SCL’s decision is final. It must be respected and applied. “
Bliuv revealed that medical experts had concluded at the hearing that the victim had very little chance of recovery:
“It just came to our attention then. The parents’ situation is extremely difficult. They have a human body, but they don’t have a human body. Experts also said that even if the victim woke up from a coma, the chances of it coming back to a full life is practically impossible. “
Although the young man’s life has been supported by the device for 3 years, D. Gulin has been tried for a serious health disorder. He could have been convicted of murder only if the biological death of the victim had been established.
“The point in such cases is the consequences, whether death or not. The man is dead, he does not breathe and his blood circulation does not work. But in this case, his life is supported by an apparatus, so there was no basis legal to condemn the author of the murder ”, emphasized M. Bliuvas.
When asked if it would still be possible to change something in a judicial sense in the event of the victim’s death, Mr. Bliuv replied: “There is a possibility of reopening the case if new circumstances become apparent. But then the death should be If there was ever a decision to disconnect the life support device, no one would update the case. “
[ad_2]
