Sweden, which has chosen a different path in the “travel bubbles”, is undesirable



[ad_1]

However, in Scandinavia, some of Sweden’s neighbors are reluctant to include the country in any travel ban exemptions. This is due to intensification of the coronavirus in Sweden, reports thelocal.se.

Some Danish opposition parties have called for the opening of borders with Germany and Norway, but not with Sweden. It is likely that when June 15. The Norwegian borders will open, they will remain closed for those coming from Sweden.

Denmark and Norway are currently relaxing the restrictions, so the situation in them is becoming similar to that of Sweden: schools, shops and restaurants are opening. However, the big difference between them is that the Danish and Norwegian governments introduced quarantine restrictions early on to curb the spread of the coronavirus, as well as expanded testing and contact tracking capabilities.

“We hope that now we only have small waves of disease, which we can overcome again through very intense testing, pinpointing and applying isolation. We hope this will be the case until a drug or vaccine can be developed,” he told The Local Norway. Frode Forland, Chief Epidemiologist of Norway.

Forland told Radio Sweden that the intense spread of the infection in Sweden now that the country is planning when and how to open its borders is worrying.

Similar fears are heard in Finland. Interior Minister Maria Ohisalo said at the Nordic meeting that the emergence of a “travel bubble” between countries could be difficult.

“Norway, Denmark and Iceland have managed to stabilize the situation. The situation in Sweden is much more worrying,” said the Minister, also suggesting that Finland may have different border opening policies for Estonia and Sweden, depending on the situation in each country. .

Mika Salminen, director of the Finnish health department, said admitting that tourists from Denmark and Norway would pose less risk than travelers from Sweden.

“It’s sad. [Sienų atvėrimo niuansai] It is a political decision, but the differences in the spread of the infection are a fact. I think the government is taking this into account, of course, “said Salminen.

In Sweden, the number of deaths from coronavirus is much higher than in neighboring countries. May 21 More deaths were recorded in Sweden than in the other Nordic countries combined.

Anders Tegnell, a Swedish colleague from Salminen and Forland, argued that the fact that the Swedish infection curve was steeper could guarantee the safety of the population. TT said: “There may be so many in Sweden for the summer [koronavirusui] people with immunity that it will be safer for Swedes to go somewhere than to others. “

This idea is based on the assumption that the coronavirus develops immunity and is not reinfected, but the World Health Organization warned that it is not clear if this is the case.

Several studies have shown that infected people develop antibodies that, according to the World Health Organization, are likely to “provide some protection” against reinfection. However, there is still no evidence that people get full immunity and how long it lasts.

The first antibody tests in Sweden showed that by the end of April, about 7.3 percent. Antibodies to the coronavirus have been detected in the blood of the Stockholm population, suggesting that this section of the population became infected in early April, as the antibodies take several weeks to form.

A similar study in the Danish population showed that the antibodies were formed in about one percent of the population. However, it can be estimated that in Stockholm, Sweden, the city most severely affected by the coronavirus in Sweden, it is forecast to reach 26% in early May. Immunity was wrong.

Mr. Tegnell also stated that foreign arrivals in the Nordic countries were not the main vectors of the infection. The virus was not brought to Scandinavia by immigrants from Italy, France or China, but by the residents themselves, who went abroad and brought the infection from there.

“So if you want to decide on the basis of this experience, countries should not allow their own people to travel to Sweden,” the epidemiologist explained.

However, not only is the infection rate higher in Sweden, but contacts are less tested and tracked than in other Nordic countries.

People with mild symptoms are not currently being evaluated unless they fall into certain priority categories, such as being a doctor or working in a nursing home. Sweden, unlike Norway, does not have an official contact tracking app.

This means that even if a larger proportion of the Swedish population becomes resistant to the virus in the summer, it can be difficult to determine for whom immunity has or has not developed, unless screening and contact testing are intensified considerably.

It is strictly prohibited to use the information published by DELFI on other websites, in the media or elsewhere, or to distribute our material in any way without consent, and if consent has been obtained, DELFI must be cited as the source.



[ad_2]