Russian msling apparatus increases sum in space and in ems

The United States, Russia, China and since 2019. and India have the means to attack satellites in launch projectiles. The possibility of using only one satellite to attack another was more theoretical. Exploding satellites orbit a lot of debris, so powerful countries avoid such an attempt.

This week’s incident could be seen as the decision of the President of the United States, Donald Trump, to establish a new space force in Washington. Space Force Commander General Jay Raymond reiterated Friday that space is a war area, as is air, land and sea.

Object E

2019 In November, Russia launched the Space 2542 satellite. A week later, the machine surprised observers by launching a Space 2543 satellite to maneuver in orbit and observe, verify, or detect other satellites.

the smaller satellite approached the US food satellite USA-245 and then another Russian satellite. The maneuvers in orbit were observed by EMS astronomers and American soldiers.

launch on July 15 at approximately 7 p.m. 50 min. Earth’s Green Day satellite, Space 2543, has an area of ​​less than 1 square meter. m, another object was launched at a fairly high speed of about 200 m per second, says astronomer Jonathan McDowell.

The derivative, nicknamed E in the US, is still in orbit and does not appear to interfere. Its size, shape, and purpose remain variable, but it does not change the potential threats from this device.

Pakriktijo’s cosmic bullet

In orbit, satellites orbit at a speed of thousands of kilometers per hour. The slightest contact with another object could break the solar cells of the satellite, damage or destroy the apparatus itself, depending on the nature of the collision.

According to the United States, the difference between the trajectory of a satellite and a weapon in space is theoretical, whatever the actual purpose of Object E is, in fact, a projectile and therefore a weapon.

Christopher Fordassak, undersecretary of state for international security and nonproliferation, said the object was equivalent to a space bullet.

There is no such thing as a curved wing, duty is emphasized, considering what the satellite can do.

Moscow implicitly blamed him, accusing Washington and London that their satellite inspectors and satellite repair programs could be used as satellite weapons.

The United States depends on its trajectory to change military satellites and launch smaller machines.

However, it is not yet clear whether the US aircraft will be able to fire high-speed projectiles, as a Russian satellite has, said Brian Weeden, a space security expert at the Washington-based Secure World Foundation.

But they probably could, if they’re a snapshot, AFP news agents say.

American dependency on space technology.

Russia may be trying to get a strategic approach to the American system, Weeden emphasized.

American food satellites often use state-of-the-art technology and we don’t develop it much, making these devices very expensive.

Russia is much less dependent on satellites than the United States, and its satellites are much cheaper, the expert said.

Raymond, the commander of the Space Forces, reiterated the position on Friday, saying that since the Persian War in the 1990s, the entire U.S. military, from military aircraft to infantry units, has relied on technology. space for navigation, communications and food.

There is nothing we can do … that is not related to space in every witty, general admired.

The United States and Russia will have the opportunity next week to discuss these issues through direct talks in Vienna, which will be the first since 2013. Both meetings on space security.

Reproduction of BNS news in the media and on websites without the consent of UAB “BNS” is prohibited.

Rayti commented