[ad_1]
The upcoming elections are forcing politicians to resort to ingenuity to get the attention of voters, and in 15 minutes they are checking the scope of truth in political advertisements and election speeches. Do you suspect that the facts expressed by the politician are false? Send your comments by email [email protected] or fill out the form below this news.
Speaking at the LRT Forum dedicated to the electoral debate on Monday on preparing the state for COVID-19 and providing protective equipment to medical institutions, I. Šimonytė stated that she was convinced that the state should take responsibility for providing equipment of personal protection to medical institutions, but did not.
“This process is left to the health authorities themselves. If you ask the ministry if it at least has the standards when it says an institution is self-sufficient, of course, all those internal mystical reserves. When you say that the institution is already self-sufficient, we don’t even have it.
We do not have a standard, we do not have the requirements that the institution must meet so that we can say yes, it is ready ”, said I. Šimonytė at the LRT Forum.
Since half a year has been in preparation for COVID-19 and the Chief of Operations, the Minister of Health has established a series of procedures and recommendations, a statement that sounded dubious and 15 minutes decided to verify if there really are any criteria for the amount of personal protective equipment that health institutions must have to be considered ready to fight COVID-19.
Take the word of the executives, bathrobes and overalls were missing
When asked on what basis he claimed that such criteria did not exist, I. Šimonytė, through party spokesman Vytautė Šmaižytė, reported that he had been allowed to confirm in this way. 2020 June 29 Information heard at the Seimas Audit Committee meeting held in preparation for the second wave of coronavirus.
At this meeting, Raimonda Janonienė, Head of SAM’s Strategic Planning and Management Department, noted that the situation in medical institutions is better than in February.
“SAM had a kind of tool installed and there were not a number of medical institutions bought completely blind. We receive weekly information from healthcare providers on the need for personal protective equipment that they believe they should have within a month. Also, how many tools do they have and what tools may be missing. “… To this day, we see that there are actually two positions in which the institutions feel a certain deficiency: gowns and disposable overalls, but all other positions practically show zeroes,” he said.
At the meeting, I. Šimonytė asked if he trusted only the words of the heads of the institutions, or if the real situation was being observed, because it was also said in April that everything was there, but the doctors complained about the lack of protection measures.
Yes, we still do not have a tool that allows us to see the amount or need for personal protective equipment consumed in real time by each treatment facility.
R. Janonienė stated that employers are responsible for the safety of employees and, according to the law, the institutions themselves must have additional protective measures.
“Yes, we still do not have a tool that allows us to see the amount or need for personal protective equipment consumed in real time by each medical institution. At this point, we had to trust the managers of the medical institutions, believing that it was their responsibility to ensure the safety of their employees. (…) We will improve it so that it can be evaluated more rigorously. To be able to compare how many tools each institution should have, a more detailed analysis is needed, we had not done it at this stage, ”said R. Janonienė.
The law has not yet been approved, it will offer to accumulate stocks for a month
Still, two months have passed since the end of June. Maybe something has changed during that time?
Julian Gališanskis, Chief Specialist of the SAM Press Service, in response to 15 minutes the question whether it is true that there are no criteria to assess the readiness of medical institutions for COVID-19 and, if so, answered that the employer is responsible for the safety of workers and that as a result modifications have been made to the law.
“Recommendations are made to medical and social service institutions on the use of personal protective equipment in accordance with safety levels. Institutions must follow these recommendations, established in Decisions No. 1 of the Operations Manual, when planning their needs and storing. V-754 and V-917, “he said.
These decisions will specify the personal protective equipment physicians will use based on their potential contact with coronavirus-infected patients. And the head of the operations center of the accumulation of a certain amount of security measures has not provided written recommendations.
SAM will propose the introduction of mandatory storage for a period of 30 days.
The SAM also reported that amendments to the law have been submitted to the Seimas, which would oblige medical institutions, other institutions and municipal administrations to provide personal protective equipment accumulating their reserves for a period of time to be determined by the Government or another institution. authorized.
“The Seimas is expected to adopt these legal acts as early as September. SAM will propose the introduction of mandatory storage for a period of 30 days. In preparation for these changes, medical institutions have been instructed to deal with the accumulation of personal protective equipment. independently since June ”, says J. Gališanskis in his answer.
Said draft amendment to the law was registered on September 4.
Thus, in the 15-minute evaluation, I. Šimonytė, stating that Lithuania does not have a standard and requirements that the institution must meet to say that it is ready to fight COVID-19, spoke the truth. In fact, the SAM has so far not established criteria on how many and what safeguards the medical institution should have accumulated for how long. The legislation that establishes the obligation of the institutions to accumulate reserves in general has been prepared and registered in the Seimas, but so far it has not been adopted.
[ad_2]
