[ad_1]
In a statement to the media, the LV®S assumed that such transaction was illegal.
“Since the transaction has the characteristics of a simulated transaction and may not correspond to its market value, the STI is requested to carry out a tax investigation, evaluating whether the price of one euro of the transaction was not chosen to avoid paying taxes to the state. “
Meanwhile, the FNTT is asked to respond if the execution of said transaction does not involve possible criminal acts.
In the event that UAB Krajama is found to have debts that reduced the value of your transfer transaction, you are requested to assess whether the loan transactions were not made for unknown reasons only to transfer funds from a company managed by A. Landsbergienė. , to another company it owns, artificially reducing the value of UAB Krajama shares before the sale of its shares, “the ruling party said in a statement.
It also mentions G. Landsbergis, whose family business, according to the LV®S, was “protected from the tax investigation.”
“The Seimas members’ petition was inspired by A. Landsbergien’s desire for answers to A. Landsbergien’s one-euro transaction questions after the Constitutional Court recognized Seimas’s resolution that appealed to STIs as unconstitutional, thereby protecting the Gabriel Landsbergis family from the tax investigation, but at the same time depriving the public to dispel doubts and discover the real circumstances of the transaction related to the Conservative Landsbergis family, “says LVŽS.
The Temporary Seimas Commission of Inquiry (headed by the Constitutional Court) headed by Agnė Širinskienė, a representative of LVŽS, invited G.Landsbergis and A.Landsbergienė to testify about the one-euro transaction, but did not attend.
G.Landsbergis at the time stated that he was unable to participate and also announced that he had addressed the President of Seimas Viktoras Pranckietis, explaining that “by using undemocratic parliamentary commissions, his activities against opposition party politicians are directed during the municipal councils , the presidential and European Parliament electoral campaigns “.
Rita Meilūnaitė, communications manager for the Queen Martha School, founded by A. Landsbergienė, previously stated that the Seimas commission seeks to navigate and politicize the details of the transaction between private commercial entities. He mentioned that the project acquired during the transaction is being developed by the BaltCap Infrastructure Fund.
BaltCap Infrastructure Fund partner Šarūnas Stepulonis previously said that managers, when talking about the one-euro transaction, were spreading only part of the truth.
After the transaction, the BaltCap Infrastructure Fund received a parcel of land and 1.4 million. debt in euros.
“It’s a shame, but a member of the commission (A.Širinskienė – 15min) publicly speaking again only half the truth, omitting essential information. BaltCap Infrastructure Fund acquired a company for € 1.25 million for the euro. (plus VAT) and has financial liabilities of the same value. After the transaction, the BaltCap Infrastructure Fund received a parcel of land and 1.4 million. debt in euros.
It would seem that even for a non-financial, such an arithmetic action should be overcome. And if the Commission requested the same Registry center to balance the company, it would ensure that its assets are negative, “he said in his response.
[ad_2]
