Recommendations to institutions on the work and service of people at risk have been repealed.



[ad_1]

“These decisions no longer distinguish risk groups, there are no recommendations to post information at the entrance with a recommendation and a warning not to visit people at risk,” said Health Minister Aurelijus Veryga at the conference of press.

“This was done deliberately in response to the stormy debate in the public sphere, as there have been cases in which the recommendations have been understood as obligations or prohibitions of access to certain groups of people,” he added.

In addition, the recommendation to educate a child at home when he has a chronic illness or when the child lives with people at risk becomes invalid. Furthermore, the recommendation to exclude a child from non-formal education if he has a chronic illness is no longer valid.

Until now, there have been recommendations for shops, cafes, or other institutions to recommend that people at risk work remotely or not work at all if this is not possible.

The instructions of the Minister of Health on the conditions for the provision of public services also required that these establishments receive information in a visible place where visitors at risk are not recommended for people over 60 or with chronic diseases.

However, Veryga emphasizes that the general guidelines for people at risk remain.

“I would like to remind you of a few. In particular, elderly or chronically ill people, particularly cancer patients, should consider working remotely or organizing work with their employer in a way that minimizes contact with other people, avoid or minimize attendance at events and other meetings. It does not matter if it is a pharmacy, supermarkets, houses of prayer, “said the minister.

“Also, don’t avoid asking family, friends, neighbors for help with food and other essentials to stay in touch with other people you don’t interact with every day,” he said.

Prime Minister Saulius Skvernelis said last week that the recommendations made by the authorities “can (…) be evaluated, understood or interpreted in different ways” should be reviewed after information on cases in which older people are given Denies the service or claims that they are not allowed to visit institutions. .



[ad_2]