[ad_1]
Recently, A. Dulkys and the entire Ministry of Health (SAM) have found themselves in a number of unpleasant situations. SAM has been criticized for signing a contract with the producer of the program “Other conversations”, which includes the participation of the minister’s public advisor, surgeon Edgar Kulikauskas, nickname of a well-known cynical surgeon. The program filmed in September was not marked as ordered. Due to this story, Aistė Šuksta, Advisor to the Minister of Communication, resigned.
The Health Ministry announced Tuesday that it has spent nearly 940,000 on coronavirus communication services. euros. The delfi.lt portal drew attention to 5.2 thousand. purchases of photographic services for the photo session of the Ministry’s leadership. In total, about 100 photos were purchased, about 30 people were photographed.
There were rumors that it would be worth it for A. Dulkis to leave SAM. Former prime minister, currently elder of the Seimas Democratic Group “On behalf of Lithuania” Saulius Skvernelis.
„<...> This is another fact that confirms that the Minister of Health has not become a politician aware of his political responsibilities and that, in the end, neither he nor his ministry have an effective pandemic management plan.
<...> It seems that Minister A. Dulkys does not realize that his direct responsibility is to find a way into the hearts of the people. Instead, they popularize public and political figures close to themselves to raise public money, thus only showing that all the talk of a pandemic management plan and strategy is still just a political mirage.
The public advisor continues to be a great expression of political trust, there is a strong bond between him and the official, in this case the minister being advised. Therefore, the responsibility for such financial decisions rests directly with the Minister of Health. You need to know what and to what extent acquisitions are being made, especially when it comes to people working or helping on the basis of political trust. ” Facebook wrote S. Skvernelis.
Paluck: I don’t see the point in faking the interpellation and interrupting the work
“Mr. Dulkis does not need my trust first, first the Prime Minister’s trust. As long as the Prime Minister trusts him, I don’t think we can raise any question of interpellations”, said Gintautas Paluckas, Member of the Seimas and Social Democrat, in the program ” Dienas pjūvis ”from the news portal tv3.lt.
The politician said that being in the parliamentary opposition means having a minority of votes, so the interpellation, especially at the moment, does not make much sense.
“I do not see sense in simulating interpellations and thus disrupting the already complex work of the ministries and the government,” said the Social Democrat.
However, due to recent events, G. Paluckas has reproaches against A. Dulkis’ team.
“I really can’t imagine a situation where the minister himself decides how many photos are needed or what report to ask for. But I really see his responsibility for the actions of his team,” said the Seimas member.
According to G. Paluck, for the moment it makes sense not to talk about the minister’s withdrawal, but about the measures proposed by him and the Government in the fight against the pandemic.
“I really see a lot of criticism. I see an honest effort. But I also see that the proposed solutions will not solve the situation. We will have seasonality, we will have ups and downs, but those suggestions are an experimentation of a certain kind,” said the Social Democrat in the program “Section of the working day “.
Another Social Democrat, O. Leiputė, of whom the tv3.lt news portal spoke a little earlier, also doubts A. Dulkis about the interpellation.
Saudargas: I have not heard that Dulk’s decisions have had a negative impact on the handling of the pandemic
The vice president of Seimas, the conservative Paulius Saudargas, is convinced that A. Dulkys is in control of the pandemic process.
“I have not heard of any personal decision that I have made about the pandemic that has in any way responded wrongly to the handling of the pandemic, any mistakes made or the like. As I mentioned, the government does not work with an ax, but with a scalpel, to not turn off the economy, those decisions are reconsidered every time “, said the Conservative in the program” Section of the Day “.
According to Saudargas, the fact that the government is adjusting its decisions in search of the best option is becoming a breeding ground for the opposition.
“But that’s the way it is, considering three key parameters of the pandemic: the number of infections, the number of beds available in the hospital and the vaccination rate. Those three dynamics are observed, evaluated and returned. [prie tų sprendimų]”Said the vice president of Seimas.
They compared the situations of Dulkis and Veryga.
Mr. Saudargas also commented on the increasingly loud speeches about raising the appeal to the Minister of Health.
“I have not heard the ruling majority question their ministers, it is usually the duty and right of the opposition. Of course, I do not want that, because it seems to me that Minister Dulkys is an experienced civil servant, a dependent man and it is not easy for anyone to deal with a crisis like this.
Aurelijus Veryga himself, who was an experienced politician, received tremendous criticism, evaluation of various decisions, but he worked throughout the period, ”said P. Saudargas.
The peasants also have plans for Šimonytė
However, the Lithuanian Union of Greens and Peasants (LVŽS) is making interpellation plans not only for A. Dulkis or another member of the current Cabinet of Ministers, but also for Prime Minister I. Šimonyte.
“We are talking about the fact that, apparently, it is no longer about individual ministers, but about the Prime Minister’s interpellation. Because there are actually too many ministers who are shockingly unlucky. “Mr. Dulkis is out of luck, there is a difficult situation and Bilotaitė is having a hard time with those” golden “houses, where the Public Procurement Office has detected a series of infractions, and Armonaite is not lucky enough to make excursions in the basement of the ministry, “said A. Širinskienė on the delfi.lt portal.
According to A. Širinskienė, the objective of the interpellation is not so much to translate the prime minister in office as to obtain answers to the questions that the peasants want to ask.
No point in waving in vain with swords
“How to say directly here …” asked Paluck about the possibility that the Social Democrats supported the interpellation initiated by the peasants to I. Šimonyte.
According to the Social Democrat, the peasant leader Ramūnas Karbauskis and A. Širinskienė have recently dominated a strange political genre, when first something is said and then asked what other opposition colleagues think about it.
The politician stressed that the Social Democrats have many criticisms of the rulers, they register proposals, most of which are rejected by the rulers. However, according to Paluck, it must be recognized that there is no alternative ruling majority.
“It just came to our notice then. Raising the interpellation at a really difficult time, just because I need extra points at the PR table, I really don’t see it. The time will come, we will present our proposals to the voters and the voters will evaluate who committed. what mistakes.
And here, waving in vain not even with axes but with swords, I really don’t see the point. The peasant comrades have their own challenges, let them solve them now. As the faction contracts, the party structure contracts, ”said G. Paluckas.
You can see the full program “Section of the Day”, in which G. Paluck and P. Saudargas also commented on the latest decisions of the Government in the fight against the pandemic, in the video, which you will find at the beginning of the article. .
[ad_2]
