[ad_1]
Three times in a row, the world high jump champion triumphed at the Gender Battle competition in Moscow over the weekend, where he crossed the 2-meter limit and achieved the best result of the season.
Still, after a brief glee at the victory, the athlete put a finger on the country’s sports suit.
Ms Lasickienė stated that if the current president of the Russian Athletics Federation (RLAF) Peter Ivanov left office, it would be another betrayal and that in that case he would not understand the Ministry of Sports, the Russian Olympic Committee (ROK), the Government or Mr. P. Ivanovo.
Mary emphasized that she would be glad if she made a mistake with her prediction, but if RLAF really loses another of its presidents, it will be a very sad situation and complete nonsense.
The athlete’s fears about such a possible scenario were triggered by the fact that Mr. Ivanov was appointed vice president of the Federal Competition Service (FAS) and, according to a presidential decree of 2009, public officials could not direct the sports federations of the country.
Furthermore, the ruling of the Court of Arbitration for Sport prohibits Mr. Ivanov, who has become an official, as well as all other Russian officials, from attending international sports competitions, including the World Championships and the Olympic Games.
It is true that M. Lasickienė, who has been criticized, received reprisals from the Russian Sports Minister Oleg Matycin.
“Mary is an incredible athlete and is entitled to a personal opinion. But in recent years, the Ministry of Sports, the Republic of Korea and the federation have done everything possible to protect the interests of athletes like M. Lasickienė. And everyone, including Mr. Ivanov, is doing everything possible to restore the rights of neutral athletes.
Athletes should feel more responsible before making such comments to government agencies, community organizations, and specific individuals. Even more so because he does not know exactly all the legal aspects of one or another matter. Our federation consults with the International Athletics Federation and will make appropriate decisions as soon as it receives clarification from it. “The president will do it himself, at that time athletes must do their job and respect the efforts of the organization defending their interests,” said O. Matycin.
M. Lasickienė also reacted negatively to the idea of changing the Russian anthem with the song “Katiuša” during the most important international competitions.
“I have a negative opinion on the use of Katiuša.” Katiuša “is a great song about the heroism of the Soviet nation, but it has nothing to do with sport, which is basically a show. Therefore, I think it is not appropriate Katiuša has its own purpose, thought and meaning that every Russian knows. And it would be wrong to use this song instead of the hymn, “said Maria.
We recall that the Russian anthem, like the flag, will be banned from the Tokyo and Beijing Olympics due to the country’s doping scandals. However, Russians no longer want to hear the Olympic anthem during the award ceremony, as it already happened in Pyongyang in 2018.
The athletes’ commission of the Russian Olympic Committee has proposed changing the national anthem “Katiusa”, a popular song about a woman waiting for a loved one who went to war.
Although the song itself is lyrical, it became popular during World War II and became a Soviet march. The BM-13 rescue jet mortar, nicknamed Katiuša and used by the Red Army.
Due to international sanctions, Russia did not formally participate in the 2018 Winter Olympics for the first time, when Russian Olympians were officially treated as “Russian Olympians.”
Last year, the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) issued Russia a new four-year disqualification for manipulating data from the Moscow Anti-Doping Laboratory, which is at the epicenter of the scandal.
Although the International Court of Arbitration for Sport has cut the penalty in half, Russian symbols should not appear in either this year’s Tokyo Summer Games or the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympics.
It is strictly forbidden to use the information published by DELFI on other websites, in the media or elsewhere, or to distribute our material in any way without consent, and if consent has been obtained, it is necessary to cite DELFI as the source.
[ad_2]
