[ad_1]
In 15 minutes applied to the drafting of the apartment building in Kaunas, avda Vytauto. Gintas resident. On March 8, according to him, the patio overflowed with construction.
“Construction started very quickly, without a foundation, without meeting basic safety requirements. I wonder what your security is. Apparently, nobody is interested, it is important to hurry to glue the box to show that the garage is standing ”, Gintas was angry.
Photo by Reader Gintas / Buildings near Vytauto avenue. 71A apartment building
The neighbors, according to him, supposedly learned that the works are organized by the same company that sold the apartments in the apartment building, the UAB Etapas. Company representatives, according to Gintas, explained that according to the old plans there was a garage in the place.
“No garage has ever been there, nor can you see it on Google Maps satellite photos. Since the land belongs to the state, apparently they came up with the idea to build / rebuild the building and then acquire the right to privatize the land.” Gintas said.
By selling the apartments in said apartment building, according to the author of the complaint, the representatives of Etapas introduced that a children’s playground would be installed in that place.
Photo of the municipality of the city of Kano / Construction near Vytauto avenue. 71A apartment building
“It remains to be seen how the apartment building was ‘delivered’ without a mandatory playground. We request this from the State Building and Territorial Planning Inspectorate (Construction Inspectorate) and the National Land Service (NŽT)”, said the resident of Kaunas that he applied to the editorial office.
He also mentioned the adjacent state-owned garages (owned by Turto bankas), one of which is allegedly used by the same apartment building company.
Permission was not requested from the municipality
Kaunas City Municipality 15 minutes reported that state supervision of construction is carried out by the Construction Inspection. This institution also carries out completion procedures for the construction of multi-apartment residential buildings, so questions about the lack of a playground, according to the municipality, should be directed to it.
“We observed that the land close to the outbuildings (buildings intended to serve the main building, such as warehouses, garages, roofs, etc.) are not formed separately. The plot on which the residential building stands is formed. The project solutions that designed the apartment building did not foresee the construction of any other building on the same lot. There were also no garages in the topographic material. You must inform the Building Inspection about possible arbitrary constructions “, 15 minutes the journalist was advised by the municipality of the city of Kaunas.
Marius Švaikauskas, the elder of the Center, who went to the construction site to inspect the site, stated that after inspecting the municipal database, it was found that a permit had not been issued to carry out works on this site.
Therefore, after registering the fact of a possible illegal construction, we request an investigation from the Construction Inspection ”, 15 minutes reported M.Švaikauskas.
Photo by Reader Gintas / Buildings near Vytauto avenue. 71A apartment building
Grupo Etapas does not carry out any construction
15 minutes The journalist contacted Grupo Etapas about the ongoing construction in the courtyard of the apartment building. Its director, Mindaugas Velička, assured that the company he manages would not carry out any construction on the site.
“We had bought several garages on the adjacent lot, which we sold before the end of construction of the apartment building in 2018. We sold them to buyers of our apartments without repairing them. Grupo Etapas has no connections to the adjacent parcel and does not have any assets on it. Only the owners who manage the real estate on the state parcel have the right to redeem the land, ”explained M. Velička regarding the construction and garages on the adjacent parcel.
He said that no one had ever been promised to install a playground near the apartment building under construction. This can be seen from the plot plan, which, as an annex, was attached to the preliminary contracts with the apartment buyers.
“As the parcel is very small, only 7.14 acres, we communicated very clearly up front that we planned to install more parking spaces, which the buyers wanted. After the ‘addition’ of the house, additional parking spaces were installed ( than the standards). They were transferred to apartment buyers. There are at least 3 playgrounds in the park across Vytautas Avenue. If residents now need a playground instead of parking spaces, residents can install it at their expense of a parking lot ”, said the director of Grupo Etapas.
Construction inspection: a garage has been registered
Who is there then and what kind of construction are they doing? Are allowed? Weren’t the residents of the apartment really promised a playground? Is it mandatory? All these questions 15 minutes asked the Building Inspection. The representative reported that, according to an excerpt from the Central Real Estate Database, the land was in 1967. Registered garage.
“According to the plan of the land presented on November 7, 2013, it has been established that the wall of the existing garage coincides with the limit of the land of the land where the apartment building is located. In the topographic photograph of the territory made in 2014, this territory is marked as built (standing building). The territory built with garages is on land adjacent to an apartment building, ”explained the Construction Inspection.
Construction Inspection: Currently no new buildings are being constructed.
The spokesperson for this institution is Rasa Kėkštienė 15 minutes It reported that the representative of the construction company and owner of the garage UAB Sollus (the garage previously belonged to the UAB Mana ranga, which carried out the construction of a residential building with several apartments) explained that the garage was in dangerous conditions, therefore than on April 20, 2020. The Kaunas City Municipality was forced to build in a way that did not endanger the safety of the community.
“So, at the moment, a new building is not being built, capital repairs are being carried out of the existing building (the mentioned garage), during which new ones are being built in place of the old walls,” explained R. Kėkštienė.
Photo of the document presented by “Grupo Etapas” / Parkavimo prie Vytauto ave. Floor plan of an apartment 71A
The site was planned in the plot plan.
According to her, the new construction project of the project “Apartment house, 71A Vytauto ave., Kaunas, prepared in 2017. The plan of the plot A LAIDA foresees a place for a playground (the installation of a playground is not detailed ) in the western part of the plot (50 m2). This is the area between the apartment building and the garage currently under renovation.
According to the Construction Inspection, the construction of a multi-apartment residential building will be completed on August 16, 2018 by drafting a construction completion certificate. During the work of the Construction Completion Commission, the National Public Health Center (NVSC), which verifies the compliance of structures with building design solutions that implement the requirements of public health safety legislation, does not He had no comment on the playground.
“The Building Inspectorate contacted the builder and NVSC to provide clarification on the installation of the playground. After receiving and examining the responses from the aforementioned entities, we will inform you by a separate letter, ”promised R. Kėkštienė.
It ensured that the Construction Inspection, in accordance with article 25 (6) (1) of the Law on Land Management and State Construction Supervision, <...> does not consider if from the act <...> More than 1 year has passed since its adoption, unless the lawfulness of the issuance, census or approval of these documents or the legality of the administrative decision is being investigated by the police authorities or it is suspected that the public interest has been violated.
“Given this, the legality of the work completion law issued on August 16, 2018 will not be examined,” emphasized the representative of the Construction Inspection.
It does not build, but repairs; no permission required
15 minutes The journalist got in touch with Justas Miškinis, director of UAB Sollus. He explained that the company he owned did not carry out the construction of said apartment building, only on June 6, 2019 he bought a garage on a lot adjacent to the apartment building.
“The garage is legal and legal. Its repairs are not sudden or accidental. As it was in a state of emergency, we had planned to repair it last year, but when the cold began, the work had to be postponed. As the weather warmed, the we continue.
As it is a simple building (19 m2 garage), a building permit is not required for the repair, more so, inform the owners of the adjacent plot. All other garage owners made the repairs last year. We just don’t survive the weather.
We had to make repairs because on April 20, 2020 we received a letter from the elders of the Center regarding negligence (for the editorial office, this letter requiring the repair of the emergency garage was sent for information – aut. After sending a Plan of limits with a marked garage owned by the company.
He assured that the company does not currently have the objective of rescuing the parcel from the state, although it should have such a right because it is the owner of the property.
The garage is unoccupied
Tomas Bagdonas, a spokesperson for Turto bankas, also tried to bring some clarity to the adjacent plots and the buildings that rise above them. Address Vytauto ave. 71B Turto bankas, according to him, manages two state-owned garages in the garage pool. They will want to sell in the future. Other garages are owned by individuals and the local government.
“The situation with the plot itself is complicated. A few years ago, Turto Bankas took the initiative and applied to the NJT, trying to form a parcel of land to find out which garage owner owns which part of the parcel. Unfortunately, this could not be done because it turned out that part of the garages are not registered, and until the buildings that are on the ground are registered, part of the plot cannot be assigned to them.
Simply put, until the plot is formed, it is unclear which part is owned by which: which is the state, which is autonomous, and which is the population. We contacted the owners of other garages to complete the registration of the buildings. When it is finished, a part of the land will be assigned to each building ”, explained the representative of Turto bankas.
After receiving information from the local population about the possible use of state property, specialists from Turto bankas inspected the state garages. The facts expressed by resident Gintas about the possible illegal use of state assets have not been confirmed.
[ad_2]
