Karbauskis: The restrictions are so drastic that they actually correspond to a state of emergency.



[ad_1]

“Everything is very reminiscent of entering the curfew 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, you just won’t find this name in the document. It has not been explained to the people how immobility between municipalities will be ensured, who will control it and how. There are also many questions about business. There were no other measures that would help guarantee the security of the provision of the service than the easiest way chosen: close, prohibit ”, writes R. Karbauskis on his Facebook account.

Although the politician emphasizes that the Government is not talking about the imposition of a state of emergency, he points out that the restrictions on circulation imposed are even more drastic than after the introduction of the curfew.

“Keep in mind that the government is not talking about a state of emergency, although the same people who are now in power dreamed of it in the spring, but the restrictions are so drastic that they would not be more severe even in an emergency.” The rights of healthy people are completely restricted. For example, young people who have not yet started a family and live in different municipalities cannot see.

Why, if they are healthy? “Said the leader of the” peasants. “

R. Karbauskis also raises the question of what measures the patrol police will take to bring together only people from one family.

“How will it be determined if these people are family members? After all, those who live together may have different surnames, they are not required to marry … Will it now be necessary to carry personal and other documents, which They must prove their place of residence, etc.? ”He is surprised.

The situation would have been better if the conservatives and liberals had cooperated with the former rulers.

The politician is also convinced that if the current government, he said, had not spent the entire year intimidating the decisions of the previous government in the fight against COVID-19, how many different decisions on compliance would the public have made.

After all, the situation would be much better now if, in the spring, with the onset of the COVID-19 crisis, conservatives and liberals had worked with authorities to work together to raise public awareness of the threat and comply with security requirements. How much dirt was spilled on the Minister of Health, Aurelijus Veryga, who communicated with the citizens on a daily basis, trying to explain the importance of the quarantine measures and their objectives ”, writes R. Karbauskis on his Facebook account.

“Unfortunately, all of this has been circumvented, as it has now been decided to mock the entire nation, without ever trying again to demand consistent compliance with all quarantine requirements that are already in place. What will an even stricter quarantine bring when part of society does not meet those requirements, as it has not done so far? Will you use force or huge fines? “, Question.

The leader of the “peasants” also points out that I. Šimonytė, commenting on the decisions taken by the government under her leadership regarding the tightening of the quarantine, repeated many times that the decisions were taken as they were made in the spring. R. Karbauskis is convinced that this rhetoric of the new Prime Minister is misleading.

“It is a deliberate omission that the decisions are fundamentally different, a different situation in the spring and now. Then we were in ignorance, missing tools, tests, masks and gloves, lack of disinfectant. But for the moment, everything is there. The tests they are also offered by private medical institutions. Doctors are incomparably better prepared. “People have every opportunity to be safe if they use all means correctly and meet the distance requirements,” he said.

No part of this publication may be reproduced without the written permission of ELTA.



[ad_2]