[ad_1]
Let that be true. But only answer the question: “And why not?”
And if we ask the question, “What does the legalization of the hunting arc have to do with the regulation of animal populations and the guarantee of their welfare (which hunters constantly emphasize as their main function)?
Then we will have a hard time finding a logical answer. Has Lithuania run out of lead that we can no longer guarantee these functions with now legalized weapons?
So the goal is probably different: entertainment, tourism, business. This would also be justified and logical, if not a “but”: who will ensure security, hunters’ qualifications, the use of weapons in the home, etc.?
In the United States, in some states you can hunt spears, hatchets, and other sharp weapons. So why are you just bowing? Let’s add spears, tomahaukas, knives, after all, getting closer to our ancestors.
Of course, there was irony here. After all, even under current conditions, hunters cannot guarantee safety: an Anykščiai shot a cow, a seimun shot a bison, a seimun’s brother shot a border guard dog, a drunken hunter he injured a colleague, and so on.
And how many cases do we still not know? How many hunters go out into the woods with a “flash” in their pocket?
So, dear hunters, I have no doubts about your benefits and your need to regulate the Lithuanian animal population and ensure its welfare, and I consider you to be a very important part of protecting the environment. Unfortunately, if you want to expand your hunting goals to include recreational hunting, your community is not ready for that step yet.
[ad_2]
