[ad_1]
Early january 15 minutes Ričardas Ūselis, the director of the Ambulansas company, which operates a private ambulance station in Šilalė, and three members of his family, who came from Vilnius, announced that the COVID-19 vaccine for doctors in Šilalė was vaccinated in a row.
After a while, it became clear that Juozas Pranckevičius, the head of the Transmeda real estate group, another relative of R. Ūselis and a former Ambulansas shareholder, also received the vaccine.
R.Ūselis 15 minutes argued for this without feeling what he has done wrong, at that time J.Pranckevičius apologized for act and repent.
In the event of a major scandal, it was debated whether or not people who had been vaccinated without a second vaccination were worth it.
People should be vaccinated with the second vaccine at least 21 days later; that’s exactly how many days will pass on Thursday, January 28th.
Deputy Mayor of the Šilal distrito district Tadas Bartkus 15 minutes He assured that vaccination the same day is not necessary, but that it must be decided no later than February 4.
The hospital refuses to vaccinate and the municipality refuses to approve the lists
It turns out that without a specific SAM instruction, the district hospital is afraid to vaccinate entrepreneurs and their children with a second vaccine.
On Wednesday, Member of Parliament Remigijus Žemaitaitis shared letters from the Šilal del district municipal administration addressed to SAM on Facebook.
From them it can be seen that the Šilalė District Hospital refuses to approve the list of people to be vaccinated provided by Ambulance and declares that revaccination will be carried out only if this list is approved by the local municipal administration.
However, the district administration emphasizes that the municipal administrations do not have the power to approve lists, the municipalities only control the vaccination process.
A lawyer asked about the vaccine.
The letter to the Ministry also emphasizes that the hospital received a letter from Jovit Elzberg, a lawyer representing J.Pranckevičius, asking when this person will receive the second mandatory vaccination.
The hospital received a letter from Jovitas Elzberg, a lawyer representing J. Pranckevičius, asking when this person will receive the second mandatory vaccination.
According to the letter, the municipality asked the Ambulance itself to clarify some of the circumstances, but received a response that the Special Investigation Service (STT) was clarifying the circumstances, so the company would not provide information and would only respond after the investigation.
The municipality emphasizes that Ambulancia presented 3 volunteer contracts with the vaccinated people, but did not provide data on whether the volunteering was carried out.
A total of 6 people were thought to have been vaccinated in a row.
Vice Mayor: We don’t know how to behave
T. Bartkus, deputy mayor of Šilalė district, revealed this scandal on Wednesday 15 minutes He said he was concerned that the date for the second vaccination was approaching because no official information had been received from the ministry.
Photo from personal archive / Tadas Bartkus, Deputy Mayor of Šilalė
“We have approached the ministry twice and today we have tried to address ourselves for the third time to answer us what to do. We have received signals from the ministry that “you must follow what the minister said in public to get vaccinated.” So I had a question: in January, the minister said not to be vaccinated, now he says to be vaccinated, the president said not to be vaccinated, the conservative faction in the Seimas also issued a statement that they will not be vaccinated. “If we don’t get an official explanation, we don’t know how to proceed,” he said.
On Monday, Health Minister Arūnas Dulkys stated that the issue of the second vaccination had been discussed with lawyers and Vaccination should be done with a second vaccination.
T. Bartkus 15 minutes He explained that if the ministry has any conclusions on this issue, it is strange that it does not share them with the Šilalė district municipality.
We have our position, but this is not a simple case: vaccines remain the property of the state
“We have our position, but this is not a simple case, the vaccines are still the property of the state, they are bought and distributed by the state, they must tell us how to deal with those vaccines, not cover up what they said in the media,” said the deputy mayor.
It’s no wonder that there are no businessmen in the district who want to take responsibility for the second shot – everyone is afraid of fines.
Health Minister A. Dulkys has previously said that natural persons who violate the vaccination line can be fined between 500 and 1.5 thousand. EUR, legal persons: from 1.5 to 6 thousand. euros.
Sigismund Gedvila / 15min photo / Arūnas Dulkys
Minister’s Representative: Compliance with the law is mandatory
Spokesperson for the Minister of Health A.Šuksta 15 minutes He said Wednesday that there is a procedure to vaccinate the population with state funds.
According to the representative of the Minister, the Šilalė government should be familiar with the description of the vaccination organization procedure, which states that if the manufacturer establishes that a second dose of the vaccine is mandatory, the person vaccinated with the first vaccine must be vaccinated . for the second time.
According to her, vaccination organizations must ensure that each patient is vaccinated with the vaccine from the same manufacturer according to the schedule.
“If you want to be sure that we must comply with the law, I know that our lawyers are preparing a response so that they comply with the law,” he emphasized.
Photo by Saulius Žiūra / Vaccination of doctors from Vilnius City Clinical Hospital against COVID-19
A. Šuksta assured that in terms of responsibility, it must be investigated by the National Center for Public Health (NVSC), the municipal administration or other institutions for laws that violate vaccination, but certainly not for SAM, since they are violations of the legislation administrative.
Under the current procedure, it is the responsibility of the head of the health institution that comprises them to ensure that the priority groups are included in the vaccination list, which must be approved by them.
[ad_2]
