[ad_1]
He took one more step
Alvydas Medalinskas, a political scientist at Mykolas Romeris University (MRU), said on Info Day that Putin had gone one step further and was waiting for a reaction from the West.
“As always, we have to look at what has been said to be the most disgusting, further indicating Russia’s aggressive policy under Putin. One such statement is that Russia can now decide for itself whether the NATO countries they can react if, for example, Russia sinks a warship from Great Britain or another NATO country – perhaps there would even be casualties or a military object attacked.
Until now, there have been no such thoughts, because we thought NATO was strong. But Putin goes one step further by testing the waters: will there be any reaction to the words that he may have sunk that ship, but there will be no world war, because Russia will not be that powerful to attack? Show.
“I’m talking about considering for the NATO countries whether they will answer whether Russia, even so far hypothetically raised the question, even sinks a warship,” the political scientist said on the show.
He recalled that such statements did not exist even during the Cold War.
The political scientist said on the show that he was waiting for the West’s reaction to the statements about Ukraine.
“I would like to see a reaction from the West and another statement: that there is no such thing as a Ukrainian nation. And that Putin will write some kind of book explaining this. This is the best historical analog of Adolf Hitler, who explained in 1937-1938 that there is no Austrian nation except the Germans. (…) In my opinion, some of the signs are increasingly worrying in Putin’s lexicon.
And I really try very hard for the reaction of some influential Western countries, which, even in such an atmosphere of rhetoric, speak of the need for a dialogue with Putin, “Medalinskas said on Info Day and recalled the initiative taken by Germany and France the last week.
A political scientist at the MRU said that the West’s failure to respond to Putin’s rhetoric encourages it to increase it.
“And the fact that the rhetoric does not end only showed the events in Crimea, in the Sea of Azov and later in Donbass. And the fourth step, which coincided with Putin’s speech: Sergei Lavrov’s visit to Turkey and a attempt to subordinate it to the will of Russia in the Black Sea, “said MRU political scientist A. Medalinskas.
The propaganda machine is working
Mantas Martišius, a professor at the Vilnius University (VU) Faculty of Communication, stated that this format is durable and designed to show two things that are most important to the nation.
“The first is that he keeps his hand on the pulse, he knows what is going on, he gets into the situation, he can answer questions. And the other thing is that it helps to show that the president is human, that he is not very close somewhere, even ordinary people can ask questions. But when you control all the media, the issues are coordinated, the image is chosen, it is very good for an authoritarian leader to get angry and convince his people, ”said M. Martišius, professor at the VU Faculty of Communication. .
He said that practically the entire event is organized.
According to M. Martišius, all questions could be divided into three parts: foreign policy, domestic policy and soft questions, which show that the head of the country is human.
„V. Putin knows that this is a good place for him. And even if it is blocked, it will be minimized ”, explained the expert.
M. Martišius assured that this teletbridge still functions as a “propaganda machine”.
[ad_2]
