[ad_1]
“It seems to me that the president is transmitting very clearly that he is more inclined to support the traditionalist and very conservative part of society.” 15 minutes Dovilė Jakniūnaitė, a professor at the Institute of International Relations and Political Science at Vilnius University, said on Sunday, evaluating the country’s leader’s performance in the march.
“This must finally be seen as a fact of our political reality,” he added.
If you are addressing an audience whose leaders are spilling hatred, you must in some way be told to read rhetorically.
Donatas Puslys, Director of the Media and Democracy Program at the Vilnius Institute of Political Analysis, claims that even G. Nausėda’s non-living presence at the family defense march shows which side is closest to him in the seething discussion about the guarantee. human. Rights.
According to him, this is not a bad thing in itself, but it may contradict the president’s previously announced ambition to be an independent arbiter of political discussions.
According to the expert witness, this is also demonstrated by the fact that G. Nausėda’s voice was not heard in any protest picket against the family defense march, although several of them were held.
Photo by Sigismund Gedvila / 15min / Donatas Puslys
In addition, the President, while emphasizing the promotion of tolerance towards other opinions, did not pay attention to the lack of respect expressed by the organizers of the family defense marches on the other side of the barricades, said D. Puslys.
“If you are addressing an audience whose leaders are hated, you should somehow tell them to read the rhetoric, not to demonize people with whom you disagree.” 15 minutes said a specialist from the Vilnius Institute for Policy Analysis.
“Now that speech has come from adaptation: he stroked his hair, but did not say that everyone has the right to choose to protest, but they do not have the right to speak on behalf of the entire nation or not incite hatred,” he added. added.
VIDEO: Congratulations from the president on the occasion of International Family Day
“Not criticizing him is also a result of weakness. If you are a referee, and G. Nausėda used to be like that, people expect you to be equally fair to everyone, ”said D.Puslys.
Viscous situations
During the rally, G. Nausėda affirmed that the state must regulate the issues of coexistence of people of one sex, respecting their right to receive information about the health of the couple, the right to inheritance and other things.
Photo by Rokas Lukoševičius / 15min / Gitanas Nausėda
However, he argued that this must be done in accordance with the Constitution, which states that the family is the foundation of society and the state, and that marriage is contracted through the free consent of a man and a woman.
“As president of the Republic of Lithuania, I will use my powers to do so,” the president assured.
Tomas Vytautas Raskevičius, a member of parliament for the Freedom Party, is finalizing a law that would legalize same-sex and mixed-sex couples. His presentation to the Seimas is scheduled for June.
According to D. Jakniūnaitė, although the president speaks about this issue quite abstractly, he probably said that he would not pass the law, and announcing this at the family defense march created the conditions for a conservative group of people to justify their decision.
He seems to be thinking about how to proceed so as not to be criticized. After all, it is important for him to please everyone.
According to the political scientist, although the president supports the conservative part of society, it does not suit him to act differently in the context of the political future.
According to her, rejecting the veto of the head of state in the Seimas on this issue would be extremely difficult and G. Nausėda should avoid a situation in which he personally “weighs the balance to one side or the other”.
“The president has been finding himself in increasingly viscous situations lately. He seems to be thinking about how to proceed so as not to be criticized. After all, it is important for him to please everyone,” said D. Jakniūnaitė.
Photo by Julius Kalinskas / 15min / Dovilė Jakniūnaitė
“The president’s rhetoric is so viscous because it allows you to discover many meanings, but at the same time it allows you to read certain messages,” he added.
D.Puslys stated that it is not clear exactly what G.Nausėda would support the Corporation Law.
“It seems to me that the president is trying to say that society is not only marriage, but also family, that it will be a union in a lower rank,” said the expert.
It raises the question of whether the LGBT rights community will agree to such regulation.
“In this case, the partnership is called an economic union, but we hear from same-sex couples who also seek a different kind of recognition that it is a union born of love and not just a technical community. After all, people get married not just because they want to manage the property or get information about the health status of the other half, ”said D.Puslys.
About 10,000 people gathered in the great family defense march. people.
[ad_2]
