G.Landsberg explained how the value of his family’s property increased up to 8 times during the year. Deal



[ad_1]

TS-LKD communications manager Vytautė Šmaižytė posted a comment explaining that G.Landsbergis and his family do not have the actual amount of ownership indicated in the statements in millions of reais, and that the ownership of a politician is publicly wrong.

After all, last year the business of G. Landsbergis’ wife, Austėja Landsbergienė, obtained a loan for the construction of a new school, and therefore it was necessary to assess the value of the shares.

“Before applying for a loan to build a new school in 2019, there was a mandatory requirement to assess the value of companies’ shares. What has been done: This value of the shares is reflected in the declaration of assets of A.Landsbergien financieros, but the financial liabilities of the business are even higher, currently reaching 20 million. euros

As previously announced, in August 2019, A. Landsbergienė increased the authorized capital of parent company Kibirkštis to LTL 12.6 million. EUR. The authorized capital was not increased by a monetary contribution, but by adding the shares of Vaikystės sodo and Karalienė Morta school to the market value of the shares determined by business appraisers ”, explains V.Šmaižytė.

According to her, “Kibirkštis” has taken over 20 million. Value commitments in euros: Leasing a new school building in the Kalnėnai district of Vilnius for 20 years, where the Vilnius Queen Martha School and one of the kindergartens in the Kindergarten network have been established since January 2020.

In fact, the assets indicated in the ITS data by individual lines remained almost unchanged: during the year, the value of the real estate managed by Gabrielius and the Austėja Landsbergis family did not change, the available funds decreased by 75 percent , at 116 thousand. EUR, the family returned 51.3 thousand. loans in euros

The biggest change is that the value of A. Landsbergienė shares increased from 8,592 euros to 12.85 million. This led to a sharp increase in the value of family assets. The nominal value of the shares does not reflect the real value of the business, it can be both lower and higher.



[ad_2]