[ad_1]
15 minutes He wrote on Monday that the Ethics Commission of the Vilnius Municipal Council announced that council member G.Jaunius had violated the principles of conduct of state politicians and thus allowed people to form a misleading opinion about his education..
While G. Jaunius participated in the Seimas elections, a questionnaire about his education was posted and is still on the CEC website. He claims that G. Jaunius has three institutions of higher education, although this is not the case. You can familiarize yourself with the questionnaire, here.
According to the Ethics Commission, a board member violated several points of the Code of Ethics – “that is, respect for the individual and the state; honesty; transparency and openness; decency; principles of excellence and responsibility ”.
G. Jaunius does not agree with this conclusion and claims that he did not take any intentional action.
“Having discussed the nature of the alleged crime with my attorneys, I would like to assure you that I did not commit any willful and deliberate action to violate the principles enshrined in the Code of Conduct.
I see procedural errors and biased politicization in the activities of the Ethics Commission, so I will try to challenge the Commission’s decision, which I consider incorrect and illegal, ”he says.
According to him, the conclusions of the decision, which indicate that he personally provided false information, are unfounded.
Photo by Vidmantas Balkūnas / 15min / Gediminas Jaunius
“I have not indicated in the CEC or in the public sphere that I have higher education and have obtained a degree. As I have already mentioned, I consider the fact of studies important. The correlation between my studies and my professional activity is significant in the definition of my skills.
Therefore, I provided the CEC with information on which higher education institutions, in which study program and during which period I studied and in what year I finished studying by terminating or suspending studies. This information does not mean that I have confirmed that I have a specific scientific title, which would allow me to say that I have provided misleading information on education, ”says G. Jaunius.
CEC photo / G. Youth youth education, indicated by CEC
According to the Council member, the CEC website or any other place in the public space does not indicate that he has a higher education and a scientific degree (bachelor, master or doctorate). On the contrary, according to him, the official part of the CEC website, where it is necessary to indicate the degree, which would mean providing information on higher education, says: Not specific. “This means that I did not provide false information about my higher education,” emphasizes G. Jaunius.
The Ethics Commission made a decision that was clearly too strict and disproportionate.
“The fact that he did not intend to deliberately and intentionally mislead voters by providing information about his education also confirms that, as a candidate in the 2020 Seimas elections, I placed information about myself, as well as my education, on the Public sphere on my own initiative. This personally published information, the content of which I may be responsible, does not indicate that I have a degree or higher education. Here is information about undergraduate studies, which was also specified in the CEC, “he says.
Photo by Rokas Lukoševičius / 15 min photo / Dawn Armonaitė
G. Jaunius believes that formal violations were also committed during the investigation. For example, an infringement investigation was launched and a decision was made based on an anonymous report. Considering that, in the meantime, Clause 29 of the Regulations for Activities of the Ethics Committee establishes a categorical rule that anonymous complaints are not considered.
“They informed me of the opening of the investigation for failing to comply with the legal term of three business days. In this case, the study was launched in 2020. on October 22, and I was only informed of this in 2020. October 30 It is also questionable that the Commission made a decision on Friday and the information was only sent to me on Monday by the late, while the information was delivered to the media earlier, creating a paradoxical situation in the rule of law where I had to comment on the Commission’s decisions without access. .
That fact suggests that the Decision was directed more to the media than to me; adopted for political or other purposes, not legal purposes, ”said my board member.
He hopes that the legal measures will succeed in stopping the smear campaign that, by not following established procedures, by committing violations, the Ethics Commission and its president, Tomas Seikalis, may have sought to cause serious damage to my personal and commercial reputation.
I am willing to defend my reputation by all legal means.
“I am willing to defend my reputation by all legal means. I hope that a proper investigation of this case will not only solve my problem, but will also prevent future opportunities to manipulate the Ethics Commission in an attempt to deal with political opponents.
I have entrusted the additional attention of this matter to the Glimstedt Bernotas ir partneriai law firm, my interests will be represented by the lawyers Linas Sesickas and Dovilė Murauskienė ”, emphasizes G. Jaunius.
[ad_2]
