[ad_1]
The Vilnius City District Court ruled in this way on Tuesday, refusing to comply with the Parole Service’s request to send D. Redikas to serve the three-year prison sentence previously imposed on him.
The basketball player could be in prison due to the fact that he had not fulfilled the obligations specified in the court’s verdict: to compensate victim A. Valentait June before June of last year. The court later extended the deadline until January of this year, but Redik has not yet covered the claim.
According to the court, D. Redik, who currently plays in France’s third basketball league, has paid 4,200 euros, although he has been awarded more than 88,000. Property in euros, 1,5 thousand. Eur – non-pecuniary damage and 871 Eur attorney’s fees.
As noted by Judge Ramūnas Keidūnas, who rejected the provision of the probation service, the court may revoke the stay of execution of the sentence if the conditions of probation are not met without just cause.
“According to the convicted himself, he is currently working, transferring half the amount of his salary to the victim, and now he is trying to get a better contract, his opportunities are limited due to the pandemic,” said the judge in the failure. . – There are no grounds to assert that Mr. Redik breached his obligation to compensate for pecuniary damage without justifiable reasons in the present case. It is also indisputable that the ability of the convicted person to compensate for the damage awarded to the victim is also limited by the extreme situation of the pandemic in the world. If the convicted person fails to compensate for all the pecuniary damage that has been awarded, the mere breach of this obligation, in the judgment of the court, will not constitute grounds for revoking the suspension of the custodial sentence that was imposed on him.
According to the judge, there is no sufficient basis to believe that only by abolishing the suspension of the execution of the sentence and sending it to the effective execution of the sentence will the principle of justice be achieved and duly implemented.
Dovydas redikas
“The execution of probation is based on the principle of balance between re-socialization and public safety; probation must be based on a rational balance between the interests of re-socialization and the needs to guarantee public safety,” the judge emphasized R. Keidūnas. – Probation must also respect the principles of respect for human rights, minimum intervention and proportionality – the parolee must be subject to proportionate and effective measures, without prejudice to their rights and freedoms, unless this is justified and necessary. to achieve the purpose of probation. Furthermore, it should be noted that the abolition of the suspension of the execution of the sentence would further reduce the possibilities of compensating the sentence.
According to the court, it cannot be concluded that D. Redikas deliberately, systematically and maliciously breaches the obligations imposed on him and there are currently no grounds to conclude that he did not justify the trust placed in him by the court, abused his rights and, therefore, Therefore, it would be appropriate to revoke your conviction.
“The essential purpose of probation is to help a person achieve his goals in life by legal means, that is, the prevention of new crimes, therefore, there is no objective legal basis to satisfy the provision of the service of probation for the convicted D. Redik to revoke the suspended sentence, “said Judge R. Keidūnas.
This court decision can still be appealed to the Vilnius Regional Court. The prosecution objected to Mr. Redik being sent to serve a custodial sentence. The custodial sentence imposed on the basketball player will end in June of this year, so even if the convict who has not compensated all damages is unlikely to go to prison, unless the appeals court decides otherwise. . But even if Redigas has not fully complied with the court’s obligations, A. Valentaitė will not escape compensation: the money will have to be paid.
Delphi He recalls that Ms. Redikas stole various jewelry from Ms. Valentaitė, which she had not only bought abroad, but had also received gifts on several occasions. In addition, he also stole the stylist’s money and a personal computer. It is true that the basketball player later bought a new computer for his ex-girlfriend, but probably for the money he received from adding his jewelry to the pawn shop.
A. Valentaitė pointed out that the value of the items stolen from her was 146 thousand. 899 Eur. Another 15 thousand. The euro victim evaluated the spiritual experiences she had experienced, but the court significantly reduced this amount.
“Watches, earrings, necklaces and rings were stolen, up to 35 thousand. euros per game, ”said the prosecutor who supports the Prosecutor’s Office in the criminal case.
The luxury jewelry of A. Valentaitė is found not only in pawnshops, but also in private persons, and D. Redikas, a suspect, spent the money received on gambling.
“He also said it was necessary for certain expenses – the trip,” the prosecutor said.
At that time, A. Valentaitė did not hide that this story was especially painful for her; Even after noticing the first robberies of D. Redikas, he was in no rush to apply to law enforcement and still gave him a chance to make amends. But unnecessarily, D. Redikas, taking advantage of the credibility of the mannequin, was able to commit even more robberies, seizing especially valuable items.
For D. Redik, the inconveniences are daily. In 2013 a man on the basketball court collided with another basketball player, then he was removed from the capital team, and in 2015. In the spring of 2006, all of Lithuania was shocked by the false story created by D. Redikas: the athlete who He was playing in Latvia at the time he told the team leaders that he had a couple of days to go because his father had died. .
The lie was quickly revealed: The basketball team leaders sent their representatives to the funeral with a wreath, but D. Redikas’s father received a healthy greeting at home. And at that time, an advertisement was ordered with regret for the loss in a newspaper. As a result of this story, D. Redik’s father survived and then disappeared; after a search that lasted several months, they found him suicidal in the forest.
The name of D. Redik has also been changed in another story: the administration of the Kempinski luxury hotel in the capital had accused the basketball player of using the accommodation services and not paying more than a thousand euros for them.
Mr. Redik is also known for fast track credit companies, whose services he has used many times but has not been able to get his money back on time.
It is strictly forbidden to use the information published by DELFI on other websites, in the media or elsewhere, or to distribute our material in any way without consent, and if consent has been obtained, it is necessary to cite DELFI as the source. .
[ad_2]
