[ad_1]
– After Joe Biden’s inauguration this week and the inauguration of the new members of the Senate, it was clear that unity had prevailed in the United States, with all the most important instruments of power in the hands of one party, the Democrats. To what extent can this threaten listened-to American democracy?
– I think the situation is even worse than the one-party monopoly, especially as a result of the first job of the new administration to promote migration from Latin American countries. It seems that until Democrats experience a powerful political bankruptcy in the next eight years, we will certainly be watching the uproar of a highly “democratic” democracy in the United States … Of course, Donald Trump might wish him well and consider his election within four years. years, but the image we saw when all the blackest technology that you could only dream of somewhere in Turkmenistan or Tajikistan was thrown into this election campaign against you would make it extremely difficult to hope for your success … I still have a hard time believing that all this happened in the US so I think we will soon see the new administration start to deal with Tramp’s “red collar people” and it will be much more brutal than anyone has ever tried to imagine …
– So, Joe Biden’s first job is to promote migration by repealing all Tramp decrees on this issue. Isn’t that the biggest problem in the United States: how many waves of migrants to the United States have decreased? Why has this occupation, including the cessation of construction of the Mexican border, suddenly become a priority for the new White House administration?
– Everything will be explained by another step that this administration will inevitably take, and it will be the legalization and instillation of all these migrants, that is, the division of their nationalities for them. And the objective is very simple: this is the eternal electorate of the Democratic Party, which will multiply mainly due to migration. This will give Democrats and the business around them a chance to rule America for a long time. These people have never thought, and apparently never will think, in the interests of the United States or through the prism of the interests of the people who created this state. They think in one-day categories and only in the context of their personal gain. Therefore, in the near future, we will observe a new invasion of America from all over the world.
– At that time, D. Tramp spoke about the aspirations to form the Patriots Party, because apparently he was disappointed with the numerous betrayals of the Republicans. Can such a party become the third force that can change the political map of the United States?
– There have been such attempts to create a “third force” in the history of the United States, but they all ended in failure: in the last 250 years, no force equivalent to the Republican-Democratic duo has emerged. Tramp can also try, but since it will be closed to all possible access to funding, it will not have much of a chance to exploit this political platform for its return to mainstream politics, and it remains to be seen if it will form the party. win the election or just cover your back? and strong enough support in the Republican Party and Senate, only a person with a very low profile in politics could lose this election, so I don’t think they should be expected to take very effective Action to form a party or try to do something with him in the political sky of the United States.
– But back to Baiden: what good are all his inaugural speeches on “national unity” when we have witnessed an unprecedented campaign of harassment, persecution and total blockade of Tramp and its supporters for the last 4 years? Can you unite anyone? ?
We need to make it very clear that there is a big difference in politics between words and deeds.
Baiden is not the leader who could lead the United States to new challenges. The stories of corruption with China as his main political supporter, as well as the most corrupt stories of his family with Ukraine, show that this man puts his personal interests before all others and only his own, if they coincide, he adds the interests of States United. State. Therefore, we should not have any illusions on this issue of the “unity of all citizens” either.
– And how, then, will the relations of the new administration with Europe, which would be very important to us, change?
For world leaders to turn a blind eye to the aforementioned nuances of Baiden’s policy, what Tramp saw as his success and victory will be massively destroyed: hence, the failure of European states to fund the NATO bloc. With Iran, eyes are closed to Chinese dominance in the European market and those markets will be even more open to them … All of these things are acceptable to European leaders, who are basically no different from Baiden himself. The kind of oligarch that rules Europe today is at the level of J. Baiden and they will get the best deal.
– And how will J. Baiden agree with Vladimir Putin? Do you have any chance to influence Kremlin politics in any way?
– Putin’s politicians were mostly harmed by Tramp, who in fact stopped the Kremlin’s global plans and invasions. It can even be said that the only positive influence on Russian politics was made by the decisions of the Tramp administration. And it’s not worth waiting for Baiden, who was vice president under the infamous Barack Obama, to do something good for the Western world. He had the opportunity to pursue a fairly effective policy towards Russia at a time when Russia was creating great problems in the world, first of all the occupation of Crimea and the Donbass crisis. But he did nothing. For him to get involved in some other politics now? Let’s not joke like that … I think that agreements will be sought “under the table” with Russia and I imagine that today the people of the Putin administration rub their hands with joy …
– Probably, and we have nothing good about it?
– Absolutely … Tramp’s policy was quite predictable: it was possible to understand the interests of the US, but also understand how it would act in case of one or another challenge. After all, everything will be settled with J. Baiden while he manages to come to terms with the Kremlin audience.
– Well, how will Iran deal with the nuclear deal? Could it be that the Baiden administration will sacrifice Israel’s security interests as a result of its signing?
– I think the victims … If we look at what has happened over a relatively long period of time – the terms of Clinton and Obama – then Israel’s problems have not been solved during those 16 years. It was then that several strange agreements were reached with Iran, which not only did not increase Israel’s security but, on the contrary, allowed Iran to develop its nuclear weapons and made it a very dangerous force in the region. Since these are the wrong people that Israel must be destroyed, the entire Democratic action against Iran was literally anti-Israel. Tramp’s position has brought complete clarity to Middle East politics, and the results he has been able to achieve there are simply phenomenal, given the cuts that have taken place there for decades. But now these achievements are coming to an end.
– Many people now notice that J. Baiden is quite difficult to walk, he has difficulties to read from a paper, he is not very good at speaking coherently without paper, his limbs shake, people even compare him to Brezhnev …
– I think it was precisely because of these incredible qualities that he was chosen. I can remind you of another famous president, Ronald Reagan, who, after being wounded in an attack, unlike the public, was in many cases incapacitated, difficult to make decisions, and the United States was ruled by a group of advisers. It is this period of the Reagan administration that is considered the most effective period during which all the wonders of the economy have been accomplished. I think we will have a similar situation here and everyone will pray that Mr. Baiden doesn’t sigh so much that he doesn’t get out of bed after that …
[ad_2]
