[ad_1]
The special permits officer said Meghan was “obviously confused” about the marriage. thesun.co.uk.
In a scandalous interview with renowned television host Oprah Winfrey, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex said they tied the knot “in their backyard” three days before an elegant public wedding in 2018 on May 19.
But yesterday, when a copy of the two’s marriage certificates was first made public, Stephen Borton, a former senior official in the Office of Professions, rejected the claim.
Borton told The Sun: “Unfortunately, Meghan is clearly confused and misinformed. They had not married three days before in the presence of the Archbishop of Canterbury. “
“The special permission that I helped draft gave them the right to marry at St. John’s at Windsor Castle. In the Chapel of San Jorge. 2018 May 19 the ceremony was witnessed by millions of people around the world. It was an official wedding celebrated in accordance with the law and recognized by the Anglican Church, “added Borton.
“I think Black just exchanged simple vows, which even he could have written himself. He says the vows by listening to the Archbishop of Canterbury, and that’s it. Or it could have been a wedding rehearsal,” he continued.
Markle, 39, astonished the world by telling Winfrey, “You know, we got married three days before the official ceremony. Nobody knows. We framed the vows we made in the backyard of our home when we listened to the Archbishop of Canterbury. “
He also recounted that Harry had called the Archbishop of Canterbury, the Reverend Justin Welby, and asked him to marry the two in private at Nottingham Cottage at Kensington Palace.
Prince Harry, 36, chimed in: “Yes, there were only three of us.”
However, Borton, now a consultant to the Bureau of Occupations, explained: “They couldn’t get married at Nottingham Cottage because it is not a place for such ceremonies and there were very few witnesses. It is not possible to marry in the presence only of the young and the clergy. Such a ceremony has no legal force. I think the Duchess of Sussex is confused and any affidavit that she allegedly hung on the wall is not an official marriage certificate. The royal wedding took place at St. George’s Chapel, in accordance with the recently amended Royal Marriage Act of 1772. In order to get married, a special permit was issued and Her Majesty the Queen’s verbal consent for the marriage and the wedding venue was recorded. “
Mr Borton also revealed that the official fee of £ 325 normally paid for a special permit does not apply in this case.
The data from the copy of the official marriage certificate confirms that the wedding ceremony actually took place in 2018. May 19 At Windsor Castle. Witnesses to the marriage referred to Prince Charles and M. Markle’s mother, Doria Ragland. The document also states that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex were married “in accordance with the customs and ceremonies of the Anglican Church”, with the special permission of the Archbishop of Canterbury. The date below is 2021. March 16 – is the date of issuance of the copy of the marriage certificate.
The Sun contacted the Windsor Registrar’s Office first, but its staff said they did not have a marriage certificate and suggested that they contact the General Registrar’s Office, where all birth, death and marriage certificates are kept. The Sun paid £ 42 and received a copy of the certificate in the mail.
Before marriage, Harry was described as “single” and his occupation as “Prince of the United Kingdom”; Meghan is described as “divorced” and her occupation is “actress”.
The father of the bride, Thomas Markle, is named “in charge of lighting” and Charles as “prince of the United Kingdom”.
Harry and Meghan’s wedding was attended by 600 guests, and the entire celebration, including the guard, was to unleash some 32 million. pound sterling.
If the information revealed by O. Winfrey is correct, then the leader of the Anglican Church, the Archbishop of Canterbury, not only broke the law, but also conducted the “fake” royal wedding ceremony in front of the monarch, who is the nominal head of the Anglican Church.
A spokesman for the archbishop said he would not comment on personal or church matters.
Mark Edwards, a priest of the Anglican Church in Newcastle, said: “When I called Lambeth Palace and inquired about the wedding, I received the answer that Mr. Welby did not attend private wedding ceremonies. Meghan confused something. On the other hand, it must be taken into account that the archbishop has not yet commented on anything in public ”.
It is strictly forbidden to use the information published by DELFI on other websites, in traditional media or elsewhere, or to distribute our material in any way without consent, and if consent has been obtained, it is necessary to indicate DELFI as the source.
[ad_2]
