[ad_1]
A. Družininas tried to convict 100,000 for the time he spent in Lukiškės pre-trial detention at that time. moral damage. Both the Vilnius Regional Administrative Court and the Lithuanian Supreme Administrative Court, which examined the appeal, recognized that the killer’s rights had been violated.
True, the appetite of A. Druzhin to get 100 thousand. it was very squashed. The court of first instance awarded him 2,000. Non-pecuniary damage, which was reduced to 800 euros on appeal.
Experienced spiritual experiences
A. Družininas noted that he had been serving his sentence in Lukiškės Prison since 1997. July 17 to February 13, 2019. He was usually kept alone in the cell and, more recently, with another prisoner.
Complained that at first there was no call button on the camera, then the button was installed, but it did not work. As a result, he was unable to call an officer or medical assistance. As a result, he suffered pain, spiritual experiences, and felt inferior.
The killer complained that he was not guaranteed privacy when using the bathroom. While he was using the bathroom, officers often watched him. Incarcerated from 2016 September 15 to 2016 October 21 there was no ventilation in one cell with another, shelves for toiletries.
According to A. Družininas, the use of the shower also did not guarantee privacy, screens were not installed, the water taps were often turned off and the officers monitored them while they washed.
The applicant stated that in 2008 in September, the administration did not provide an opportunity to attend the mother’s funeral. This caused great spiritual experiences and a feeling of inferiority.
In their response to the life sentence of the convicted person, the representatives of the Vilnius Correctional Institution requested to reject it and apply the limitation period of three years. The claims are claimed to be unfounded. It was emphasized that the officers were monitoring the inmate according to the established procedure.
A decision in favor of the murderer
The Vilnius Regional Administrative Court was the first to lodge this complaint. April 1 decision partially confirmed the applicant’s complaint. A. Družininas was sentenced to 2 thousand. for moral damage.
After examining the written evidence examined, the court concluded that the prison had endeavored, to the extent possible, to improve the plaintiff’s living conditions and health. However, it was emphasized that A. Družininas’ privacy had been violated when using the sanitary facilities.
The court determined that the plaintiff had spent 822 days in a cell where privacy had been violated through the use of a sanitary facility. In determining the amount of non-pecuniary damage to be awarded, the court took into account the nature and duration of the violation, the fact that the plaintiff had not presented evidence that this had caused irreparable long-term consequences.
However, this decision was appealed by representatives of the Vilnius Correctional Center. And his complaint was confirmed in part. The amount of non-pecuniary damage awarded is 2,000. it was reduced to 800 euros. This order is not subject to appeal.
Head shot
All the victims of A. Družininas were killed outside the territory of Lithuania. A. Druzinin worked together with his accomplice, a Belarusian citizen Vasily Vasilyev.
They committed the first crime in Russia in 1995. A. Družininas, who came from Lithuania, had a firearm with him.
His victim became a Lithuanian in the city of Voronezh, in central Russia. They met in the car market. At that time, A. Družininas sold his car to VAZ.
A. Družininas offered to walk his compatriot who visited the market. The aforementioned accomplice of A. Družininas V. Vasiljevas was sitting behind the wheel of the car.
A. Družininas deliberately sat in the back seat and left the potential buyer in the front passenger seat. Then A. Družininas asked the accomplice to stop and, as if he were nowhere, killed the Lithuanian with three shots to the head.
After appropriating his belongings, the assassins buried his body in the forest. After a while, another crime was committed. This time, A. Družininas with a Lithuanian and his friend from Belarus came to V. Vasiljev to Russia to inspect the VAZ car for sale.
A. Družininas had already heard that the Lithuanian had recently sold an apartment in Kaunas, so he could have 8 thousand with him. AMERICAN DOLLAR. A. Družininas and his accomplice agreed to kill the victims and seized the money. The plan was fulfilled along the way.
A. Družininas asked the Lithuanian sitting behind the wheel to stop because he needed to go to the bathroom. As soon as this stopped the car, A. Druzinin started shooting. Soon, both victims were pulled from the car.
To ensure this, A. Družininas also fired control shots at the victims’ heads. However, the amount of money found among those killed was significantly less than what the killers expected.
On November 10, 1998, the Vilnius Regional Court sentenced A. Družininas to death for these crimes. She was immediately commuted to life in prison.
V. Vasiljev was not extradited to Lithuania for these crimes. Although A. Družininas claimed to have been charged and did not commit any crime, his guilt was confirmed by both the Lithuanian Court of Appeal and the Lithuanian Supreme Court.
[ad_2]
