Ball court: victims and witnesses, still under fear?



[ad_1]

“Release me on bail, I will find him!” Replied Giedrius Janonis, the leader of the ball group, who was being tried together with his accomplices from the court cage, when the judge who heard the case declared that it was not possible to summon one of the victims to the hearing.

Shooting in the Netherlands

Before today’s hearing in this case, which caused considerable repercussions, which the Kaunas Regional Court finally managed to open, an ordinary deputy with the status of victim was received. ask to hear the case without him. “I live abroad and I can’t come,” said M.P.

“And our laws do not provide for the search for a victim,” admitted defenseless judge Algirdas Jaliniauskas. After that, G. Janonis simply introduced himself: “When the police needed his testimony, he was found. And although he said he did not want to be recognized as a victim, he was recognized. Only now it is not found. Although the episode related to him decides our fate, because he is at greater risk!

The seven people, who were ordered to take revenge on M.P.

According to the indictment in this case, which became famous only at the last hearing, although it has been in court for more than half a year, M.P. Life was attempted in the summer of 2011 in The Hague, a city in the Kingdom of the Netherlands. And such instruction was given to seven accused by the group leader G. Janonis. Due to the fact that M.P. he defeated his relative and did not consider the positions of him and other leaders of the group. The seven people, who were ordered to take revenge on M.P. Additionally, he was ordered to be injured along with M.P. at R.M.

After receiving 4 thousand. At a travel cost of € 1 million, the task force took the Netherlands in two cars to collect the firearms belonging to the group. However, there the task was not completed, as only M.P. launched into the streets in an ambush. They shot him four times, causing serious health problems. This was done by Artūras Osmankinas and Regimantas Jonušas, who are awaiting sentencing, and are currently being sentenced to a more lenient arrest warrant. The firearms used in the crime were thrown into a nearby water channel.

Giedrius Janonis

Ambush at the apartment building

The other victim in this case is A.P. – also asks the court to question him remotely. And the judge agreed to his request, although neither the most active defendants nor their lawyers wanted to accept it.

According to the indictment, A.P. He was beaten and robbed in November 2011 on the instructions of G. Janonis and another ball leader, Tomas Gaidanka. This task was carried out by four of the defendants, who received a car with foreign license plates.

In it in A.P. The apartment building, waiting for a comfortable moment, wearing masks and picking up a radio station, was on duty for a long time. A.P. always appeared not with one, but with a friend. At least the accomplices in the car were informed by one of the future members of A.P. four of the attackers, on duty across the street with another radio station.

Finally, after arriving at a convenient time and attacking A.P., it became clear that the task could not be completed to the end because the victim lacked a chain and watch, which they had ordered removed. As a result, after A.P.’s beating, a sports bag and purse appropriated this. A.P. he was also evicted. wallet, where you can find 3100 litas to share on the spot.

New threats

As already written, the prosecution in this case is also based on the testimony of those who agreed to cooperate with the police.

One of them, according to the accused, who has the nickname of Bebro, also asks to be interrogated using videoconferencing equipment.

“Due to the tension and stress of attending the court hearing, it would be problematic: in late April, a pre-trial investigation into threats against me and my family members was launched. I am exonerated from criminal liability in the main proceedings, whose separate part is pending before the Kaunas Regional Court. And all these defendants, whom I have known for more than 30 years, are also present in that case, “said the witness mentioned in his application.

Janonis replied again that he had no idea how to make an impact in the courtroom.

The judge ruled that he would make a decision on this witness’s request only after the prosecutor provided details of the pre-trial investigation into the threats to which he referred.

Forced confrontation

At today’s first hearing in the case, only two witnesses were interviewed after the indictment was made public. The other five, who were also invited, did not arrive.

One of the witnesses interviewed was a resident of Petrašiūnai, who in the late afternoon of September 21, 2010 saw a white bus arrive from the Kaunas lagoon to the trolley stop, from where the young man took another guy out and dropped him off. on the sidewalk and left the scene.

The person who repaired the bus, who also has the status of a suspect in the large case mentioned above, was interviewed. He apparently excused the defendants by presenting evidence to law enforcement officers only because a person, nicknamed Arbuziuk, had already been released. When asked by the judge what he knew of the defendants in this case, the witness replied that all of his former clients were in the court cage.

However, the said bus with a hole of four to five centimeters in the side was presented by A. Osmankin, who has the nickname of Osama. And took after this father’s repair.

Incidentally, in addition to the defendants, their lawyers and the journalists of the portal kauno.diena.lt, a person who introduced himself as the grandfather of A. Osmankinas, who said that he missed his grandson, who had been detained for more than two years and is not allowed to visit it, participated in today’s hearing.

No one admits guilt

As already written, only a part of the crimes charged against him, that is, – six episodes of his crime.

Three completed in 2010-2011. The same is true for 2017-2018. The latter are mainly related to the results of the searches that accompanied the balloon arrests.

T. Gaidanka, Deividas Čereška, Andrius Juodis, Genadijus Ževžikovas, A.Osmankinas and Genadijus and Rolandas Borisovas are also awaiting the sentence of G. Janonis, 44, who has already been sentenced twice (first in 1992 – as a minor). .

The remaining nine defendants in this case: Tauras Grinius, Andrius Guoga, Justinas Jašinskas, R. Jonušas, Mindaugas Lukauskas, Eligijus Maželis, Edgaras Meizeraitis, Marius Navickas and Nerijus Venslavičius.

The charges against him range from unlawful deprivation of liberty to organized grouping and physical violence, attempting serious damage to health in a universally dangerous manner and serious damage to circumstances, theft, use of firearms or the seizure of high-value assets, serious damage from torture or other ill-treatment. , illegal possession and smuggling of firearms abroad for the purpose of committing a crime there, falsification of documents and their kidnapping or use for criminal purposes.

Neither of them admits their guilt.



[ad_2]