[ad_1]
As the portal “15min.lt” first announced, there will be no rush to return the Association Law to the Seimas.
“It is difficult to say about the specific date. There really was no such conversation, whether it was November 11 or December 23. Just reacting to certain tensions in society and to allow room for discussion, I think it would be more prudent to make it a little later, ”said Tomas Vytautas Raskevičius, a member of the Freedom Faction in the Seimas.
However, the parliamentarian welcomed the prevailing perception in the ruling coalition that “one cannot afford to put this issue in a drawer for another four years.”
“There was also an informal coalition meeting today, this issue obviously remains on the political agenda,” TV Raskevičius said on Monday.
See the assumptions that tensions in society will begin to subside.
“And I see that in today’s meeting with the representatives of the Family Movement. Obviously, there are already different requirements, they are modified according to realities. The more people make the responsible decision to get vaccinated, the lower the tensions in society. And after knowing certain decisions of the Government after September 13, I believe that the situation will gradually return to normal and return to the normal course of life, “said VT Raskevičius.
He also plans a discussion with the hierarchs of the Church.
Having previously stated that he is planning a debate on the issue of association with Church leaders, the MP does not reject such an idea and believes that a “mini-conference” on this issue could be held at the Seimas in October. .
“In May, allegations were heard from the respected Agnė Širinskienė that the project was registered under the table, it was not discussed. Now we will really create platforms for discussion. I just hope that the opponents, who constantly blame us for the lack of discussion, actively participate in that discussion.
A debate in which one party says “no, there is no need for such regulation” and the other party says “we have been prepared for a long time” is not a debate. We all need to find a common platform; it means (agreeing) that relationships in which people live together without marrying should be regulated, and then we can start discussing the details, ”said VT Raskevičius.
There are four aspects of the discussion.
According to the MP, four current aspects of the discussion have emerged in discussions with representatives of the opposition and other interested parties.
“One of the aspects is the definition of association itself, which is why the president of our state has expressed criticism of the Companies Act,” said VT Raskevičius.
You have said before that you see no problem in clarifying the definition of association itself.
Other aspects, according to the parliamentarian, are more practical.
“One of them is related to the possibility that the partners have a common last name. (…) Of the four (discussion questions), this would be the last thing I would like to give, ”said VT Raskevičius.
Another debatable issue, according to a member of the Seimas, is related to the registration of a company in the civil registry. It is proposed that the company be registered with a notary public.
“If we could secure additional support for this project, I think the middle option could be considered, showing the public that life does not stand still and that the end of the world did not come due to registration of partnerships,” said VT Raskevičius. .
The fourth proposal concerns the termination of a couple before a heterosexual couple registers a marriage.
“In an older project, if a heterosexual couple decides to get married, they just go ahead and get married. The association is automatically canceled. Now there are proposals from the opposition that they still need to artificially end the partnership, divide the property and only then go to marry. This proposal should be discussed, because I think it is very impractical in legal terms, “said VT Raskevičius.
It is strictly forbidden to use the information published by DELFI on other websites, in the media or elsewhere, or to distribute our material in any way without consent, and if consent has been obtained, it is necessary to indicate DELFI as the source .
[ad_2]
