[ad_1]
According to the statement of the former member of the Seimas Naglis Puteikis, the expanded panel of judges of the court evaluated the legality of three decisions of the Minister of Health, which he adopted as head of state operations in a state of emergency.
The SACL stated that the Minister of Health had not been duly authorized since May 1 of last year, when the reforms to the Civil Protection Law came into force, because the Chief of Operations had been appointed in accordance with the wording of the Law previously in force. . It provided that such appointment could be made by decree of the Prime Minister, while, under the new procedure, the chief of operations had to be appointed by decree of the Government.
Therefore, the court found that the Minister had exceeded his authority by making three decisions in his capacity as Head of State Operations for Emergency Operations on the conditions of international flights and patient registration, which were contrary to the law.
The expanded panel of judges of the SACL, taking into account that the acts declared illegal regulate issues of public importance and in order to allow an adequate regulation of said legal relationships, decided to postpone the official publication of the decision and publish it in the Registry of Legal Acts as of June 1 of this year.
The panel evaluated the legality of only three decisions, and concluded that only a part of the decisions requested for review were valid at the time of the procedure and had not been modified by the recast.
[ad_2]