[ad_1]
The politician wrote that a doctor, his student, prof. Andrius Mac’s thoughts on his social media profile.
“He shared his thoughts on manipulative political correctness. Andrius writes in a confused way, but rightly I agree with his thoughts. I especially liked the metaphor of ‘frozen hake eyes’. …
I must admit that I have had to face political correctness many times. Politics is generally considered an art of compromise.
I agree that compromises must be sought to achieve political goals. But always? And today, I see some politicians trying to please as many people or colleagues as possible, so clearly and without expressing a position or avoiding it. I admit that the temptation is very great. You don’t want a “radical” or inflexible politician label. They don’t want anyone. Because in the long run, even those who support it will start to be afraid to back up your opinion. I have heard it many times before in my direction. Nobody wants to become an outcrop of “hills” or other “influencers” who share “jams”, which leaves all the content of the last lunch, “wrote A.
In his essay, the politician considered whether to get it right.
“Now we will live on those who have more followers on facebook or instagram? Will we live up to those who, if necessary, can scoff with hundreds of thousands of signatures? All for the sake of peace and fear of damnation?
If our parents or grandparents had feared condemnation for their faith and views, Lithuania would probably never have been a free country. Therefore, do not be afraid of pronounced “celebrities”, because on behalf of the followers they would change their minds, even several times a day. They have done it more than once, ”said A. Veryga.
The politician said that Lithuania is at the crossroads of very serious decisions.
“It will depend on these choices how we live in the coming decades and whether our society will face intense social engineering. And I don’t mean a pandemic at all.
I’m talking about decisions that are more important to people than pandemics, because pandemics come and go. However, changes in people’s value systems are factors with much greater creative or destructive power.
Nowadays, various formats speak of changes in the concepts of family, language, gender or, more precisely, of the attempts to apply aggressive measures of social engineering to change these concepts ”, wrote A. Veryga.
He spoke in favor of gender reassignment.
According to him, all these areas affect our constitutional provisions or the provisions of the United Nations conventions, or they are simply trying to deny natural biology.
“Schools already say that it is not normal to decide one’s gender. I think it’s normal to have a variety of questions, but for most, that question didn’t even come up before ultraliberalism. The absolute majority knew what gender they were. The ultra-liberals think that this is not enough. They believe that opportunities for gender reassignment should be provided even before the age of majority. Just great.
Gender change is impossible because it is encoded in our genes, if we are already talking about biological sex. To change it, it means seriously damaging the body through surgery or extremely aggressive doses of hormones. It is often mentioned in this context that it is not a disease or disorder. In that case, the dear ones want to ask, what are we going to do there with the surgery and the hormones if it is not a disorder? And if we talk about social gender, when a person imagines himself as something, then at different stages of life we have different imaginations and they change rapidly. There are even very exotic imaginations. Will we complete them too? And another very modest question. And how many times is it planned to allow a gender change? If it is already possible once, why not two, four or even every year? ”Wrote A. Veryga.
Positions expressed on the concept of family
The politician also expressed his views on the concept of family.
“Family. Another bastion of fundamental value. Family is work. First with yourself. Hard work, sometimes disappointing, but ultimately rewarding. Life is born in the family. However, it is believed that it is no longer necessary.
Now the family can be called by any name. If you already want it to be a marriage between a man and a woman, here is the marriage of a woman and a woman who considers herself a man and will be a family. If it is a “family” of two men, their surrogate mothers will give birth to them, “wrote A. Veryga.
A member of LVŽS is convinced that same-sex marriage is not an end in itself.
“After the legalization of a family of people of the same sex, without a doubt the possibility of adopting children will be sought. This is already the case in politics. You can rarely achieve what you want. Therefore, to pursue what can be achieved, leaving new steps for the future when the political context is more favorable.
Changing the concept of family is only the beginning. Sometimes asking about the concept of family brings you full circle. In this context, I have had to ask myself what I consider a disjointed question of whether I do not consider grandparents as families if I am only in favor of marriage between a man and a woman. I really don’t understand the logic of such questions. And what are those grandparents going to marry and have children with? Anyway, they are already a family and do not need to be artificially renamed in some way.
I have more than one gay acquaintance or friend. They are great people. None of them participate in this show of Marxist ultraliberalism, ”wrote A. Veryga.
Opposes drug-related liberalizations
The former Minister of Health is adamant about drugs. According to him, it is a force that destroys the body, the personality and the integrity of society.
“The power of which the intelligent are billions, and those who believe in them steal the dose, deny the future or even begin to kill. It is an addiction that we now want to call freedom. I miss a ship like that. After all, in theory, the prison is freely selectable.
The willingness to steal or commit violence is also gratuitous. Should we decriminalize them too? What are reckless decriminalization advocates, whose supporters draw pictures of marijuana on posters, really looking for? Definitely not decriminalization. I am in favor of criminalizing minor offenses, and this needs to be addressed, but don’t be fooled. There will be no stopping here. Even the conferences of defenders of decriminalization speak of decriminalization (when there is no longer responsibility for consumption) and legalization, as some other countries have already done ”, said A. Veryga.
The politician wrote that he has more than one addicted friend.
“They are also great people. Damaged and often suffering, but wonderful. Help others to get up. They do not believe that drug addiction should become the norm of society, because they know what it can end in, ”wrote A. Veryga.
He bit Matula
In this recording, the politician also acquired his political opponent from the Conservative Party Antanas Matulas.
“Here is a colleague A. Matulas, who previously had tried to hit the ‘mainstream’ and it was convenient to criticize the measures of control of the alcohol of the farmers, and when he saw the results he wanted it to be recognized as his merit. public support, you’ll want to contribute to it, but it still pays for you to seek political correctness and say you hear that liberals have a right to review everything, and maybe something is really wrong.
This is a position that is not a position, but as my colleague Andrius Macas says, it is a demonstration of the ‘frozen hake eye’, still trying to maneuver in a way that is good for everyone. And good is never good for everyone. It will be good for the millions that are carrying or for the people and their children. You still have to decide. There are far fewer buttons to vote in the Seimas than social genres, only three, and actual positions, only two, ”wrote A. Veryga.
The politician understands that their positions can receive ambiguous evaluations.
“Apparently, with this speech, I will finally be classified as obscure and backward by” mainstream “writers. According to recent polls, the rural population supports me more as a politician. Understand that these dark people receive more support from the village and less educated people.
Most of Vilnius are the same third-generation newcomers from the “people” who look on with such derision. And aren’t those “villagers” the most sincere? They rarely think of political correctness. The people have always been a support for the country, whether it was necessary to eat or soldiers to defend the country. I am happy to be of rural origin and I believe that political correctness will be put in the country at least for some time. You can hate me for my opinion, but at least you will know what it is, “said A. Veryga.
It is strictly forbidden to use the information published by DELFI on other websites, in the media or elsewhere, or to distribute our material in any way without consent, and if consent has been obtained, it is necessary to cite DELFI as the source. .
[ad_2]
