Police investigation after Maybach and her friend Rita got upset about “Only Tok” and YouTube

At that time, the Vilnius Regional Court declared that Maybach’s behavior in public space exceeded permissible limits, violated the rights and interests of other people, because he not only used uncensored words, cursed, but also showed disrespectful gestures.

“The crime scene is a public area to which other people have the right to enter without the consent of the perpetrator (in this case the public areas of the Tok Only program and Google’s You Tube social network), where the person is subject to certain behavioral requirements, namely, respect and not violate the rights and seriousness of other people ”, according to the court, Maybach disturbed the seriousness or public order with his illegal conduct.

A pre-trial investigation was launched against the Trakai police for posts posted on social media, but officials later terminated it, but charged Burov with administrative misconduct. For them, a 30-year-old man, who became famous for his insulting actions on social networks, was fined 300 euros. This was the second time Maybach was punished for publicly published records.

Shocking videos

Officials began the investigation after receiving a complaint, with one person claiming that Burov “speaks and portrays unacceptable content to minors and minors on social media, talking about sex, humiliating women, justifying oral sex as an element of liberation. feminine “.

“The content of the images is shocking,” said the man who complained to police.

These records have already been removed, but according to officials, this does not in any way reduce L. Burov’s liability.

Maybach, who was fined, was reluctant to put money into the state budget, not to mention that law enforcement officials were unaware of the details from social media and punished him unreasonably. Ms. Burov appealed the police fine to the courts, but they ruled against her husband.

At the time, Burov told the court that the videos for which he was being punished had not been made public and that all of his “official social media accounts” were marked with badges (S and N-18) warning that advertising could have a negative impact on minors and is intended and appropriately strictly for adults and adults only.

“Before any live broadcast, I always verbally advise that the content may have a negative impact on minors and is intended and is strictly appropriate for adults and adults only,” he explained.

Maybach stated that the videos for which he was prosecuted were not made public by him but by others.

Maybach: I deserve compensation

“I cannot pay fines for anything, I cannot be held responsible for material uploaded by others,” explained the man to the court who lives with his parents, has money, so he was able to pay the fines because he “won.” Don’t pay without evidence. ”He also added that he once paid a fine when he was punished by police for posting the video, but only later did he realize it was unnecessary because officials did not have a copy of the video.

“Police officers are biased, unfair, unprofessional, completely unaware and incomprehensible about social media issues,” Burov said, referring to himself as a social media star. “All they want is for me to pay cosmic fines for nothing without any proof. And that’s why I feel moral exhaustion, stress and psychological consequences ”.

“I am being punished for the second time just because the officials do not know anything about social networks, they are inexperienced and unprofessional, they do not understand that anyone can create a social network account, it costs nothing, you only need an Internet connection and email” he explained outrageously. Famous man.

Maybach added that as a result of the lawsuit, he “lost a lot of valuable time, energy, health”: “I think I am worthy of compensation for improper work from certain law enforcement agencies and obvious violations.”

The man also pointed out that the videos for which he had been fined were “clearly altered, edited, falsified and illegally distributed”: “This violates both my rights and my privacy, as well as the strict rules of YouTube.”

Furthermore, in response to his accusations of uncensored words used by the public, he claimed that Bibi candies were produced in Poland and sold in hundreds of stores in Lithuania and throughout the European Union.

“I demand the conclusions of the State Lithuanian Language Commission that Bibi candies are called an uncensored word and there are severe administrative penalties for sucking them, and I also demand the conclusions of the Consumer Protection Service that there are no warning signs that Bibi candies are sold. It carries strict administrative responsibilities, “he explained.

Furthermore, he noted that during one of the most popular talk shows in Lithuania, “Other Conversations”, even vulgar words or gestures are used, which is not prohibited.

Oaths, uncensored words, insults

According to the case, two videos in which Maybach filmed with her then friend Rita were published on the Tok Only and YouTube networks in April of last year.

In one post, Maybach asks his girlfriend if she wants a pinch, and when she says she doesn’t want to, the man asks what she wants. And Rita responds: “I love myself (…) by the mouth.” In another recording, Maybach, upon hearing that his girlfriend “wants ice cream, molluscs, raffel, shrimp caviar, whipped cream”, declares that “with such the subsidy he can less (…) it stinks me.”

Uncensored, offensive curse words that are not acceptable for use in public are also heard on other records recorded and publicly distributed by law enforcement officials.

At the time, the post posted on YouTube contains a live stream that not only uses obscene words, swear words, but also insults and humiliates women. In this video, there was also an obstacle for people watching the live broadcast: Maybach presented them with various offensive words, in addition to pointing the middle finger.

“The district court ruled that Mr. Burov not only sought to offend those who had made unfavorable comments in public, but also insulted, intolerant and cynical attitudes towards a particular social group (such as the rural population) or other sexual orientations (for example , against a gay group, threatened revenge, “said Judge Aiva Survilienė, who examined the case against Maybach.

According to her, the Strasbourg court has emphasized that discrimination based on sexual orientation is as serious (serious, dangerous) as discrimination based on race, origin or skin color.

“The freedom to express beliefs and disseminate information is incompatible with the dangerous and illegal actions of L. Burov”, according to the court, when exercising their rights and freedoms, a person must abide by the Constitution and the laws and not restrict the rights of other people and freedoms.

According to the court, L. Burov, using offensive and uncensored words that are contrary to good morals, realized the danger of his actions and wanted to do so. The court also noted that one of the recordings was distributed on the fastest growing and most popular social entertainment network, TikTok, to minors.

“Although, according to Burov, its public accounts on TikTok, the most popular social entertainment network for minors, use warning signs that the content is for adults only, the additional safeguards ensure that the videos it creates and transmits do not accessible to “None,” according to Judge A. Survilienė, Maybach’s recordings were accessible to all, regardless of age, and he used uncensored words and phrases in these videos, the use of which in public space violates good customs and public order.

Maybach’s friend, Rita, was also administratively sanctioned for the violation of public order, but accepted the sanction and did not appeal the police sentence in court.