[ad_1]
Gediminas Vaitkevičius, who is on trial in the case, is charged under two articles of the Penal Code: defamation and violation of public order.
S. Skvernelis, who was recognized as a victim in Tuesday’s session, did not participate.
“I should have asked to be heard without him, and it is possible that he could not have fallen,” Dominyk Vanhara, Skvernel’s lawyer, told the court.
Guardian: The language has evolved and confirmed that the inscriptions are his.
Edgaras Ugianskas, a VAT official who took over the protection of S. Skvernelis, claimed that he was guarding the prime minister at the time and received information about some notes that appeared on the street.
“That day we worked, there was 24-hour service, the shift manager received a call that there are notes on the protected object and the measures need to be reinforced since it can reappear,” he said.
According to the security guard, it happens with protected persons that people “appear and interfere”.
Upon receiving the information, he said, he was patrolled. Officers drove down the highway around the area and explored the surroundings by turning on their headlights.
According to the official, while he was circulating in this way, he noticed a bicycle parked on the sidewalk, from which a backpack hung with a bottle of paint. But no man was seen.
“While we were looking, a man from the forest appeared, greeted, I think we met him, we greeted him. The man contacted us, he did not resist. That language developed and he confirmed that he wrote it down, ”he said.
According to E.Ugianskas, the man did not have an identity document, so the police were called.
“A thief’s house, Skvernel, looks like this,” he said, asking to recall what was written on the asphalt.
There were more details about E. Ugianskas in the famous testimony that night.
The testimony claims that the notes were noticed as early as the morning of the same day, but initially no one paid attention to them.
When the prime minister was brought home after work, around 8 pm, the guards went to see what notes were left.
Then, according to him, a reflector flash was seen in the forest near the road.
When illuminated with a flashlight, two flasks and a yellow vest were observed inside, according to the testimony.
When he stopped, he saw a bicycle, which was disguised, and a backpack hanging from the steering wheel. When illuminated with a flashlight, two flasks and a yellow vest were observed inside, according to the testimony.
Soon one of the guards noticed the silhouette of a man falling from the forest; the man was walking towards them.
“He waved his hand, supposedly, here’s his bike. He was wearing tight sportswear T-shirt tight shorts and a helmet. He was wearing black rubber gloves “, – it looked like GG Vaitkevičius, taught the security guard in the testimony.
The man, according to him, initially told security guards that he was doing sports: riding a bike. But the guards saw traces of white paint on the gloves.
Noticing that the guards saw paint residue, the man, he said, began to shake.
When it was announced that the police would be called, G.Vaitkevičius admitted that he had arrived on Upės Street last night and left notes.
According to testimony, when asked why he returned to the street after one day, G.Vaitkevičius said he wanted to see if the notes were not washed; if this had happened, he promised to highlight them.
“As for the illegally paved road, it was his protest that was made illegally and he has important facts to confirm it,” recalled E. Ugianskas the conversation with G. Vaitkevičius, who explained why he did it.
When asked on whose initiative Grinda started cleaning the note, E. Ugianskas could not say that. She said she didn’t call her staff herself.
Whoever called the “Grinda” doesn’t know
Another security guard, Raimondas Meilūnas, confirmed the words of a colleague in court.
According to him, although G.Vaitkevičius said that he likes to ride his bike at night, it was suspicious that his rubber gloves were stained with paint.
According to the security guard, the man asked if he could drive and when he heard that he could not, because he was suspected of having carried out “some actions”, the interrogator admitted that the notes were his.
The security guard confirmed that the man was not detained by the police but by VAT.
However, when asked what document was written during the arrest, he said that he made a statement to the police.
“I don’t just remember taking a photo … It was a statement,” he said.
When asked who called Grinda, whose staff scratched the notes as soon as he arrived, he, like his colleague, was unable to respond.
According to the security guard, it is necessary to contact his superiors for this.
“We have a center to which we pass any information, then the information goes to the management chain,” he said, pointing to the head of the board, who, depending on the case, had also reached Upės Street.
Personal file photo / Gediminas Vaitkevičius
S. Skvernel: This is a humiliation for me as a man, as a father.
S. Skvernelis was questioned at the last meeting. He claimed that this act undermined his reputation as a politician.
The parliamentarian stressed that the information provided in the media despised him as a person.
“It is a humiliation for me as a man, as a father. “Nobody wants to experience it, it provokes spiritual experiences,” he said.
According to S. Skvernelis, he had not met G. Vaitkevičius before, this last name did not mean anything to him, the former prime minister said that he had no conflict with him.
[ad_2]
