Slush: Easter will not necessarily be remote, certainly not necessarily

“The limits of probability theory are always very wide. There may be limits to what will and will not be the case. Either way it may be correct and, in reality, there will not necessarily be an Easter remote. I have not heard such a speech from the Government to do something, to limit or release something, just to follow the daily situation, to see how the situation changes every two weeks.

If the situation improves so much that it is possible to start moving, vaccines will move well enough, we will have less chance that older people at risk will experience some serious health problems, Easter will not necessarily be remote, certainly not necessarily, “he says. L. Slušnys.

Different solutions may be needed in a couple of weeks.

According to him, the situation continues to improve after all.

“It just came to our attention then. If we take the period before Christmas and then what happened in January, think about the dramatically good changes that have taken place in that month. I boldly say that the month is a lot, the results can be a surprise, nor do I doubt it.

The situation is improving a little, the number of infections, which ranges between four and six hundred, is a bit worrying.

It’s worrying, but nobody really gets up so brutally here, people adhere to quarantine, certain requirements and it may be that in a couple of weeks other decisions will have to be made, ”says L. Slušnys.

Shadow: we have to avoid threats.

Asked if it is possible that before Easter we will see many people who will try to violate the quarantine restrictions, L. Slušnys considered that everything could be in the future, because people feel tired.

“Assessing the situation where people feel very tired from the quarantine during this period, not even the Easter issue here, is a good observation that psychological fatigue, when people who are active, who want to do something, they have activity, suddenly they sit in front of the screens long, fatigued. But I would still say that there is a risk and it will be necessary to assess whether we want to be angry, fight or let go.

You see, the situation is simple: the experts, when assessing the situation, usually assess the maximum threats, it is their job. I think it is being done quite correctly and logically, because while we can, we must try to avoid maximum threats. When we see that the situation is changing, we will also have to think about the need to weigh in the balance. “On the one hand, the desire of the laity to violate, on the other side of the balance to help the maximum possible risks expressed by the experts,” said the interlocutor.

On Wednesday, the government decided to ease outdoor restrictions: allow open cultural spaces, meet five people, allow practical driving training.

As of March 6, it was decided to allow contacts between the two homes in the open air and allow them to hold celebrations in open spaces.

Sports, leisure and outdoor entertainment services will be available for a maximum of five people. It also promotes child care centers.

It is also allowed to provide vehicle training and examination services as of March 10.

Interior Minister Agnė Bilotaitė said at the meeting that the institutions that provide these services are prepared to provide safe driving training services.