[ad_1]
How justified is some teachers’ dissatisfaction with the AstraZeneca vaccine? Are there better and worse vaccines? Tum Beinort, a physician at Cambridge University Hospital in the UK, emphasized on the radio news program “Question of the Day” that the AstraZeneca vaccine is no worse than others.
Mr. Beinort said that since AstraZeneca was the first to initiate clinical trials, some questions were left unanswered.
AstraZeneca was the first company to start clinical trials with vaccines, there were some problems. Because the research design that was initially published has some unanswered questions, not enough older people were included in the research, ”Beinort said on the news radio show.
It considered that this could also be a partial error of the investigation.
“This was the first study of a coronavirus vaccine in the world. Obviously, other companies may have learned from this mistake. And they immediately simplified the study design a lot and perhaps avoided these difficulties,” said the doctor.
AstraZeneca, Biotech / Pfizer and Moderna coronavirus vaccines
Beinort said the vaccine was effective.
“In general, this vaccine is really effective. We must bear in mind that when we look at the research results, all the research that has come to us comes from a small enough number of people who have experienced the infection factor. The Moderna, Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines show an efficacy of around 94 percent, but we have around 100 to 150 infections in these vaccine trials. And AstraZeneca has been in vaccine trials a bit longer, with more than 300 infections now, “he explained.
T. Beinort, a physician at Cambridge University Hospital, recalled that the vaccine was more effective at maintaining longer intervals between doses.
“Recent data shows that after the first dose of AstraZeneca, the vaccine is 76 percent effective, and after 2 doses, it is 81 percent effective if there is a 12-week interval. The main finding of this vaccine is that if the interval between two doses is not long, for example, only 4 weeks, the effectiveness is low enough, “Beinort said on the radio news program” Question of the Day. “
He said the Moderna, Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines were very excellent, but he did not agree that the AstraZeneca vaccines were inferior.
© Zuma Press / Scanpix
“Obviously, it is also very effective,” said the doctor.
When asked about the side effects of the vaccines, Beinort said the side effects were greater after the second Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.
“We see that after the first dose of AstraZeneca, there is a much greater stimulation of the immune response. It is so much muscle pain, headache, fever with bath at the injection site that is seen frequently. More than 1 in 10 people. There is a much lower incidence of side effects after the second dose of the vaccine. And after the RNA vaccine, the effect is greater after the second dose of the vaccine, ”said the interviewee.
“People are more afraid of that fever after the first dose. And we didn’t find out about the second dose, but all these side effects are anticipated, “he explained.
According to him, the long-term side effects after the fixation of the vaccine take a long time.
Beinort said he considers the most popular coronavirus vaccines today to be “really effective.”
“I would definitely not rate them. It will be possible to comment more on this topic when we look at real world data,” said Dr. T. Beinort on the radio news show “Question of the Day.”
[ad_2]
