[ad_1]
The list of crimes of Jevgenijus Vorobjovas and Vaidas Vitkus imprisoned in the Kybartai Correctional Home is extremely long and nature is vast.
V. Vitkus, who has 32 convictions, is famous as a thief and swindler. You are convicted of fraud, theft, breach of public order, misappropriation of the name of a public official and a person who performs functions of public administration, production of a counterfeit electronic payment instrument, forgery or illegal possession of an electronic payment instrument, illegal access to information systems, extortion, stamp, kidnapping or use of a hijacker of a stamp or document, etc.
Erik Ovcharenko / 15min photo / Kybartai Correctional Center
J.Vorobjov was sentenced 13 times. In the past, it has been obstructed by a violation of public order, fraud, drugs, destruction and damage to property, theft, robbery, weapons, minor damage to health, false reports of a danger to society or a disaster, and so on.
Even the dungeon could not prevent crime. It is true that this time more dangerous measures were taken: another convict was attacked. The attacker did not survive the outbreak of violence.
Beat both or one?
According to the case file, both defendants in this case were accused of having in the Kybartai Correctional Center in September 2018, acting in a group of accomplices, and they got up with the victim DP, who was also sitting after the jail. conflict, together deliberately hitting at least one with their hands and feet, in total at least five blows to the head and various parts of the body. D.P. He suffered multiple bone fractures and serious head injuries. After being in a medical nursing hospital, the victim survived for half a year; On March 25, 2019, his life died out. Both assailants were then charged with murder.
While testifying in court, J. Vorobjov pleaded guilty to the murder entirely, denying the fact that he had killed in association with V. Vitkus, claiming that a person with more experience in the crime world only participated in the conversation. with the victim, she did not hit him.
Erik Ovcharenko / 15min photo / Kybartai Correctional Center
The conflict between the prisoners flared after agents searched the living room of the accused and other convicts and found a cell phone. J.Vorobjov immediately admitted that he thought D.P. he gave them to the officers. The victim was suspected because the agents removed him immediately after the search, and the “plaintiff” returned, allegedly with cigarettes, which he had not been able to buy before.
The defendant stated that he was only threatening D.P. hit, it won’t kill. And he wouldn’t have been hit so hard if he hadn’t resisted. After the first threats, the victim allegedly admitted this himself after receiving cigarettes from officials.
In court, J. Vorobjov admitted that he had been violent against convicts 5 times prior to this incident. He regretted the murder, assured the judges that he was thinking daily about what he had done. The only thing that disappoints the accused is that his friend V. Vitkus was innocently involved in this event.
The beaten man did not even remember that there were repairs to the home.
V. Vitkus did not plead guilty in court. Referring to the circumstances of the incident, he said that said phone, which the officers found in his room, was worth 500 euros at the correctional facility. V.Vitkus testified that he did not participate in the act of violence and did not kill anything, he did not even see how J.Vorobjov did it, otherwise he would have arrested his friend in time. Supposedly, this whole case against him is created by the administration and the intelligence because it causes many problems in the correctional facility. Although there are witnesses who say that he hit the victim, all, according to the accused, lie. He did not make those shots, he is captured in the footage.
D.P. himself, questioned during the pre-trial investigation on February 21, 2019, showed that he did not recall that there were repairs to the home. Who hurt his head does not know.
One of the correctional institution officials testified in court, listening to other convicts that the victim was initially beaten by V. Vitkus, and J. Vorobjov ended the action. Most of the witnesses in this case are prisoners, and some of their testimonies are inconsistent.
After listening to the testimony of the witnesses and reviewing the video recorded by the cells of the correctional facility, the Kaunas Regional Court decided on June 8 to acquit V. Vitka, without proving that he had participated in the commission of a criminal offense. According to the panel of judges, there is no evidence to suggest that V. Vitkus, acting in a group of accomplices with J.Vorobjov, simultaneously beat D.P. and committed the injuries specified in the specialist’s findings that resulted in the victim’s death are not in the case.
And here J.Vorobjov was found guilty of killing D.P. He was sentenced to 13 years in prison, serving the first 5 years in prison and the rest in a correctional facility.
Vorobyov was also recognized as a dangerous recidivist. As you can see from the history of the convictions, he has also been convicted in the past for aggravated homicide, for crimes committed while he was still a minor.
During his sentence, J. Vorobjov was repeatedly punished with disciplinary sanctions, including for using violence against other convicts. It is negatively characterized. The condemned is left with more than 10 years in prison.
The killer’s sister – 3 thousand. euros
In the case, the murderer D.P. sister’s civil action, seeking the prize of € 100,000. EUR damage. A civil action was initiated against D.P. while I’m still alive.
The victim’s sister, according to J. Vorobjov, should be compensated by the correctional center, as they had to ensure that this did not happen. D.P., according to the defendant, was in captivity for the murder of his mother, so his sister, even in the presence of his brother in a coma, did not want to take him, angry at the murder. According to J. Vorobjov, the claim for damages is only his desire to make a profit.
From the data on the convict D.P. quotes, emails received, and others show that there is no information that the killer’s sister has visited or contacted him at the correctional facility. Therefore, taking into account the fact that there is no data on the close and permanent connection between her and the murderer in the case, the non-pecuniary damage suffered by the victim was estimated at 3 thousand. euros
The sentence can be appealed to the Lithuanian Court of Appeals within 20 days from the date of its publication (this term is calculated for the detainee from the date of notification of the copy of the sentence) by filing an appeal before the Kaunas Regional Court.
[ad_2]
