[ad_1]
– Right now, as we speak, Russian President Vladimir Putin’s annual press conference “from the bunker” is still taking place, although the most anticipated questions have already been answered. So what could you expect from this event?
– Probably everyone expected him to admit clearly that he had poisoned Alexei Navalna …
– Unfortunately, these expectations did not come true. He said he hadn’t poisoned him; if he had wanted, he would have silently poisoned him, and A. Navalnas supposedly works with foreign special services, so the FSB gently supervised him …
– Well, of course, this response was prompted by Russian propagandists … And seriously, Putin and Russia, as well as the United States, are going through a very difficult period, both of political and economic crisis. Therefore, all of Putin’s speeches and his “answers” to alleged “questions” from journalists are aimed at stabilizing public sentiment. Could we have expected to hear something new and important from such an event? Of course not, because the arsenal of various jokes (like the ones to catch in squats) has been exhausted, there are also no failures in the economy, and it is impossible to explain why you are once again on the throne, even if you have promised don’t do it so many times. Therefore, old formulas and old incantations are repeated.
– Let’s go back to the case of A. Navaln, which was very encouraged this week by the material published by the Bellingcat research group, Der Spiegel and CNN: specific poisoners – Russian FSB officials – were published in detail with their names, documents real and counterfeit, even photos. All the circumstances and even the entire history of 4 years of follow-up of A. Navaln are exposed … In this context, V. Putin’s answer sounds very unconvincing and abstract. Or maybe that was the goal? After all, Russian society does not seem to be hampered in any way by the fact that the government of your country is poisoning its citizens … Perhaps this even increases the popularity of the government?
– Without a doubt, Putin took a defensive position. If you have been following a person for 4 years and they haven’t done anything, you need to know exactly and say who did it. If A. Navaln works for foreign special services and has committed criminal acts against the Russian Federation, why has he not been arrested so far? If you have not worked for foreign special services, for what reasons are you prosecuted? And why not be sued for poisoning? So there is a lot of circumstantial evidence here that the smell of the famous medieval poisoner Giulia Tofana, who drowned about 600 men, emanates from the Putin government. The situation is aggravated by the fact that there were many poisonings, from Litvinenko, Politkovskaya, Skripaliai to Kara-Murza and other opposition figures. It all falls too clearly in one place to say it was all about coincidences or unfortunate coincidences. And if the Putin administration really doesn’t do that, it must find those who poison and kill Russian citizens. Well, in Russian society after the poisoning V. Putin really has more support than before the poisoning … For Russian society it is more of an attraction, as evidence of the crime of the already entrenched and self-committed government, but not as a sympathy for A. Navalns himself or the preparation. to support him in his political ambitions and actions … It must be said that A. Navalnas is not the new Russian leader expected of us – he is a man who has appeared many times in various actions of the Russians “Djerimord-Black Hundreds “, repeatedly positioned as a strong anti-Semite, supported The Occupation of Crimea, etc. All this shows that his coming to power would likely mean even more complicated relations with Russia than under the current Putin government, because the common “Krymnashist”, who came to power, would like to repeat the Crimean scenario elsewhere.
– Let’s take a look at the latest news from America: there the Electoral College confirmed this week that the election was won by Joe Biden. Have Donald Trump’s last hopes really been dashed?
– Tramp has publicly stated that it does not recognize J. Baiden as a winner. And that means he remains on track to fight for the presidency. Several US states have already declared that they are introducing alternative voters due to previous electoral fraud. Tramp continues to gather evidence that the election was rigged and that high-ranking officials of former President Barack Obama are now being questioned on criminal charges. The Tramp administration expects very important evidence to emerge here, claiming that Baiden and the Democrats have falsified the election results. So, as the old adage goes, nothing is finished until everything is finished. Trump, who knows the Jewish Torah well, probably remembers Jehovah’s words: “Fight to the end without sparing the claws, and I will help you …” So Tramp does not forgive the claws he has taken on his opponent, and we we stay to watch what happens next.
Let us recall once again the suffering of Brexit, especially since the recent meeting between British Prime Minister Boris Johnson and the President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, which was followed by many optimistic predictions. stated that it is unlikely that there will be any agreement. Why?
– I would suggest readers to read our 4-year conversation in the “Republic” on this very topic – we predicted this situation very precisely … The result cannot be simply because there is no concept. There is no situation in which Britain can fully engage with the EU. and knocking on the door without backing down, but there is no situation in the European Union to rule Great Britain without any demands on it. A good theory is said to provide 80 percent of the practical realization. But there is no good theory in this case. resemble a world in which the European Union, Great Britain, China, the United States, Russia or the smaller players are integrated with their own interests and policies. I think it’s time to say that on one side of this struggle we have the ideas of the new socialism proposed by the host of the Davos Forum and the various hairless attempts by Maoists, socialists and other unfinished communists to turn our world into something of a Chinese concentration camp. the other side of the fight is an attempt to preserve what Napoleon dictated in his statutes, protecting private property and the human right to property. And until there is clarity on this first line, no one can agree.
– The Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) has ruled that Hungary has violated EU law by not accepting illegal immigrants during the previous crisis. But the paradox is that all the laws governing illegal migration were passed much later, when the crisis subsided, and at that time each country escaped that influx as it knew. And, in general, under what law and on what basis should Hungarians go around the world? Perhaps it was simply decided to punish the Hungarians on this basis “for disobedience” to the knights in Brussels?
– During that crisis, I was just traveling through Hungary and giving the Republic an interview about hundreds and thousands of the so-called “refugees” who were lying in their garbage on the Hungarian lawn near the gas stations … They all went to Germany, because Angela was standing there with her spike in hand. Merkel also invited everyone to come, and naive young Germans, showing off their beauties, shouted: “We love refugees.” So to say that the Hungarians did not accept anything is funny. Only the Hungarians here did not invite to that mass, it is not clear for what purpose the young men who run without documents who lost their families and were invited by their mother, Germany … The Greeks, Italians or Spanish could say the same when the desolate people who heard Angela Merkel screamed invading the shores of Europe, so it is a crime to blame the Hungarians of today. refugees “lovers of angels and Syria, sadly, Hungary intervened … Recently, there have been false accusations from Brussels they see grames with the Poles who are blocking the EU budget, although they did not interfere, but simply did not agree with demands that they disagreed when they joined the organization. These are what Brussels calls the “principles of the rule of law”: accepting transitions around the world, granting exclusive rights to all fictitious homosexuals, mentioning the rights of all other people, legalize the extradition of young children to those who cannot identify their gender, etc. be punished and all sane people must begin to fight against this biological nihilism, which is being sponsored by the leaders of Brussels.
[ad_2]
