Lithuanian police news hit migrants well: it will take us a long time to recover

“But at one point I lost everything,” admits Victoria, who lived near Klaipeda but who did not emigrate to the good life to Britain today with minor children: she decided to leave her homeland after the tragic death of her husband in an accident , when he could no longer pay his bank contributions from his salary. mortgage taken out.

This young woman, like many other emigrants, fell into the trap of a criminal convicted fifteen times without suspicion: Andrius Raziūnas (born 1985), who was incarcerated at Prisoniškės Prison Hospital at the time, was the unofficial head of the services Legal officers based in Kaunas and the debt collection company Turtuvos grupė promised Victoria to settle all of her real estate matters. However, this not only got stuck in even higher debts, it also lost all the real estate. Its value is almost 140 thousand euros.

The emigrants were a delightful bite to A. Raziūnas, a Pravieniškė “student” who pretended to be a lawyer and sometimes a lawyer, Eimantas: they not only blindly believed in the stories he created, but also agreed to pay money for the supposed work without any dispute.

A. Raziūnas, who had accumulated huge profits from trusted people, only his wife Agnė Raziūnė (born in 1981), who headed the documents of the “Turtuvos grupė”, and Antanina Stafeckienė (born in 1932), a pensioner from Šiauliai who played a very important role as a wealthy businessman in your affairs. they are being tried for fraud; his case is being heard by the Kaunas Regional Court. A. Raziūnas is also accused of murdering a former Vilnius doctor.

In this case, up to 36 victims have reported more than 600 thousand. Eur claims for damages, the court has temporarily confiscated the property belonging to the “Property Group”. Admittedly, the company’s director repeatedly sought to have this arrest lifted, as prosecutors had not filed charges against the Turtuvos Group, but the judges failed to comply with their requests and emphasized that both company shareholders, Raziūnas spouses, were accused of criminal acts.

The scandalously well-known Turtuvos group continues its activities: it publicly announces on the Internet that it successfully collects debts, continues to cooperate with various state and police institutions, and is even pleased that more and more clients appear.

The people who were dealing with this company at the time offer to go as far as possible and admit that they even cursed the day they went to the “Turtuvos grupė” for help. Read more about this in the first, second and third. Delphi article cycle “Debt Master Charm“

After the death of a man: the burden of debt

Viktorija Galdikienė, a resident of the Klaip whoda district who emigrated to the United Kingdom almost five years ago, was one of those who suffered the most damage after the collision with the Turtuvos Group. Her mother, who read the ad in the “Savaitė” newspaper, offered to contact the company, which was very popular at the time.

The widow was in dire need of qualified legal assistance at the time: her husband, who had just died in an accident in the United Kingdom, from whose money the family covered the mortgage, had died.

“In 2006, together with my husband, we took 800 thousand. Litas loan, for which we bought a house and partially installed it, the woman told the sad story of her life to the police officers. – As guarantee of this loan, We have mortgaged the husband’s parents’ department. We periodically pay money to the bank under a loan agreement for approximately 9 years, but in June 2015, my husband in England died in an accident, so I was unable to pay the fees Loan to bank only. Expecting nothing in September, I went to live and work in the UK with the kids, and the bank loan was only growing, I just didn’t have enough money to pay it back. “

According to the woman, after the death of her husband, she and her children inherited the plots in the Klaipeda district. They thought that Victoria could have become the family’s salvation.

“My mother found an ad in the” Turtuvos grupė “newspaper about real estate inquiries and loans, so I decided to call. I didn’t know how to deal with inherited real estate, I didn’t want an apartment built by my husband’s parents to be sold to bank at auction, Victoria said. – When I called, a man spoke to me and said he understood my situation perfectly and could help me. Of course, it immediately seemed strange to me, not everything is so simple, I even asked. And he assured me that If I wanted to save my father-in-law’s apartment and pay off the loan, he would take care of all the legal matters. “

Victoria did not have the opportunity to be permanently in Lithuania, so she went to the notary with her mother and empowered her to handle all the legal and non-legal affairs of her daughter, and sent documents related to land and a bank loan to the Turtuvos Group office in Kaunas.

“Since then, my mother has taken care of all matters with this company. She said that she communicates with attorney Eimantas, who constantly calls and reports what she has already done and what she intends to do,” he said.

You will have to donate land

According to Victoria, after a while, the mother announced that a woman who wanted to buy land and a residential house had appeared, saw photos online, that she really liked and wanted to buy for her son.

“Eimantas emphasized that the buyer is a very promising entrepreneur,” said the woman.

2016 In early February, Victoria again received a call from her mother: She said she had to come to Lithuania to sign the documents. The woman immediately immediately bought tickets for the flight.

“A girl came to Kaunas to meet me in a luxurious black car, where an old woman was sitting; she took us to a notary,” said Victoria. – On the way, the girl said that she would have to certify with a notary that she had received the money, that she would have to donate my land to an old woman who would take care of my loan to the bank. It is said that to pay the entire unsecured loan with interest, my mother-in-law will not lose the apartment and I will run out of debt. As this girl said, so it was with the notary later: he asked me if I got the money, I confirmed it, then he asked me if I really wanted to donate my property, I confirmed it again. In this way, a donation agreement was concluded and an older woman paid for the services of a notary. ”

According to Victoria, after the transaction, the girl took her to the airport and the old woman got off at the bus station on the way.

“A few months later, my mother called me and said that I had to sign the donation documents for the younger children, so I flew to Lithuania again; the same girl met me at the Kaunas airport and took me to the same notary” recalled the emigrant. – On the way we went to pick up the same old woman. And I signed the documents for my minor children at the notary. “

The woman who donated the property was waiting for the day to come when she would finally receive a message from the bank that she no longer owed a penny. Before contacting her, she asked to contact attorney Eimantas, but he assured me that the documents are still being processed and that legal proceedings are under way.

“He kept saying that it could take time, you don’t have to survive, everything will be fine, you just have to wait,” the victim recalled the words her mother transmitted to her. But Victoria did not receive that day in 2017. In February, the mother who called her reported that she had been contacted by a police officer, who reported that they had been deceived by representatives of the Turtuvos Group.

“I lost everything, I lost my inherited land, I owed the bank the same outstanding amount with even higher interest, and my father-in-law’s apartment is now being auctioned off,” Victoria said. The police officers showed him several photos and asked him to identify the girl and the woman with whom he went to the notary. Victoria pointed out that the girl was A. Raziūnė and that the old woman was an intelligent and wealthy woman like A. Stafeckienė.

Everything changed after a call from the police.

At the time, Victoria’s mother Dalia Gedvilienė says that she did not want her widowed daughter to go to Britain with her grandchildren, but that there was nothing she could do.

“After the tragic death of the son-in-law, we went to the SEB bank, we tried to find solutions, but here they told us that the bank would not donate a single penny and would still have to pay the full loan,” said the woman, who was in a situation difficult, looking for ways to sell faster. They inherited parcels of land and to cover a huge loan to the bank, otherwise the property could have been seized by bailiffs and probably would have been sold at a much lower price than the market price.

“When her daughter contacted Grupo Turtura, she told me about her husband’s sudden death,” so she was very stressed, she did not know what to do after the funeral, so she believed everything that lawyer Eimantas said, “said the mother of Victory.

According to her, the lawyer gave the impression of being a reliable and qualified lawyer, he always spoke specifically and promised to solve the problems as soon as possible. “He had found a woman who would take over the land, and her son, who works abroad and earns well, had obligations to the bank,” Victoria’s mother recalled.

She believes that the criminal, who posed as a lawyer for the “Turtuvos group”, tried to include her in his affairs. When his daughter handed him all the property that belonged to him, the lawyer Eimantas said that “almost everything is arranged, but the notary needs to see the files on the land.”

The woman decided to go to Kaunas herself: she was received at the bus station, as A. Raziūnė, Managing Director of the Turtuvos group later discovered.

“We went to the notary in a black SUV that belonged to her, she looked at the files of the land and said that she could not make any transaction related to the real estate registered in the daughter’s name,” he said, taking her back to the station. buses immediately after the failure at the notary’s office. , but did not return the documents.

She later received a representation agreement by email, stating that she would be represented by attorney Snežana Raižienė regarding obtaining legal permission to sell the parcels on behalf of minors.

“Eimantas said that I would need my daughter’s signatures on the contracts, because I cannot sign for her,” according to D. Gedvilienė, soon the daughter flew to Kaunas, where she went to a notary office with two women and signed donation contracts for land.

“The daughter thought that the old woman could be very rich, because the € 500 bills were scattered in the notary’s office,” recalled the witness. Turtuvos grupė soon sent him an invoice stating that 882 euros were to be paid. As attorney Eimantas told you, court costs.

“After that, I kept calling Eimantas, but he said he was still processing the documents, and once he called and said he needed 2,000. Victoria’s mother told the police about Eur’s bribery, which in that case the court would happen earlier. “I said that not only do I have money, but I have no acquaintances to work as judges.”

The woman called Eimantas, a lawyer, several times, but he kept wasting his promises and sometimes he justified himself as very busy: that he was out or represented the interests of other clients in court.

“This continued until the police called me and told me that the donation had been made illegally and that the bank had notified the daughter that the credit agreement had ended, the debt would be transferred to the bailiffs for her recovery: my daughter she was deceived, she lost her property and she also turned herself in to the judicial agents to recover the loan taken from the bank, “said the witness.

It was enough to threaten the STT

The sculptor Jonas Raiskas de Birštonas, who lives in Northern Ireland, also fell into the traps of the Turtuvos group. He applied to a debt collection company located in downtown Kaunas in 2014. October: The artist wanted to recover more than 1.3 thousand from an acquaintance. British Pounds.

“Known to the activities of Turtuvos grupė by acquaintances, he said that the company can help to recover my borrowed and unpaid money,” he said since 2006. Š constantly. A sculptor who lives in Ireland. – I found the company contacts in the newspaper and called the woman surveyed to explain my whole situation. He then said he would pass the information on to an attorney who would contact me. That’s right: a few minutes later, a man called and introduced himself as a lawyer, Eimantas. He promised to clarify the whole situation and requested documents. “

The artist was in Lithuania at the time, so he decided to bring important documents to the Turtuvos group office; He thought he would speak face-to-face with attorney Eimantas about the prospects of recovering the borrowed money. But there was no lawyer in the office: the employees asked them to leave the original documents. Eimantas was unable to be in the office at the time: A. Raziūnas, who pretended to be with him, was imprisoned in Pravieniškės and handled all matters with the clients of Turtuvos grupė by phone from his cell at the Prison Hospital.

“Approximately a couple of days later, the lawyer Eimantas called me again and said that he would seek the debtor’s property both in Lithuania and abroad, and also hinted that he would take him to the courts in Lithuania to recover the debt,” said the emigrant. 871 euros, which he would have recovered along with the borrowed money.

Although he promised to find a debtor as soon as possible and recover his debt, J. Raiskas did not obtain any results: “He kept calling periodically and they told me he was working, looking for my money.”

Finally, after a good half year, the artist received a call from A. Raziūnas, who claimed to be an Eimantas lawyer, with good knowledge.

“He said he had found my debtor’s property in Lithuania, he allegedly had a plot between Vilna and Trakai,” recalled the victim. – And he stated that if I want to claim a debt, I have to buy that parcel of land, because, as the lawyer Eimantas pointed out, the debt with me is less than the price of the parcel. Attorney Eimantas emphasized that the land is very expensive. I was very surprised by such an offer. I said I don’t need a stranger, that I want to pay my debt. So Eimantas said he would have to pay 5,000. 900 Eur. I asked for copies of the parcels, but the lawyer said he did not have them at the moment, because he is in Vilnius in court, where he has cases. “

The sculptor did not hide the fact that the lawyer Eimantas spoke casually, so this proposed transaction did not cause him any suspicion.

“A few days later, on the Kaunas Acropolis, I exchanged pounds for euros and 5.9 thousand. I took the Eur to the Turtuvos group office. Here I transferred the money to A. Raziūne, said J. Raiskas.” I demanded to give a document to transfer such an amount of money, but A. Raziūnė said that the lawyer Eimantas had coordinated everything. “

The influential lawyer Eimantas had to be guarantor of the clients in all situations, but the artist had not even seen him, he only spoke on the phone, so he requested a copy of the documents related to the land. And when A. Raziūnė handed them over, the artist was surprised: the land was no longer near Vilnius or Trakai, but in the Kėdainiai district, in addition, Aidas Ražanauskas was named its owner. He is the brother of A. Raziūnas.

“The lawyer knows everything,” only A. Raziūnė heard that response when the man began to ask about the changed situation.

“I thought maybe something had changed, but I didn’t care exactly where that terrain was,” the man admitted. Lawyer Eimantas, who soon contacted him, said that the parcel in the Kėdainiai district actually belongs to the elderly A. Stafeckienė.

“He said that the contract must be certified by a notary, so he will contract it, which will cost me an additional 500 euros, but I did not agree and said that I would bring the notary to that old woman myself,” continued J. Raiskas. “But Eimantas did not agree, so the contract was not certified by a notary.”

But soon the man received another invoice for the services rendered: he paid more than 400 euros. He kept waiting until he finally recovered not only his debt but also the money invested in his recovery.

“I constantly wrote several questions to the company, but did not receive an answer, then I called A. Raziūne, director of the Turtuvos group, but she did not know anything and referred me to the lawyer Eimantas,” said the sculptor. – Losing my patience, I wrote a registered letter to transmit information about the company to the Special Investigation Service (STT). After receiving this letter, attorney Eimantas fearfully called and said that he could pass the information on not only to STT, but to everyone else as well. After thinking, I decided to contact the director A. Raziūne, because I had concluded a contract with her for the provision of services, so I started to call her and write letters. Finally, I was invited to the “Turtuvos grupė” office, where the lawyer Eimantas gave me a thousand euros, and later A. Raziūnė, another 4.9 thousand. Eur “.

He offered a sandwich instead of money.

Another migrant entered into a similar fraud scheme, but she was not as successful as Š. For the sculptor living in Ireland, Valentina Bindokienė, who emigrated to Great Britain a few years ago, lost almost 9,000. Eur. Also, only at the beginning of the police investigation, the woman knew that 100 thousand. LTL (almost 30 thousand euros) has been transferred to the Turtuvos Group for only 100 euros.

The woman, who turned out to be the victim, told officials that she had also signed a service contract with a debt collection company and had paid the agreed salary. The woman also signed another contract, but did not even elaborate on the words written on it, where she stated clearly and unequivocally that she was transferring her debt to the “Asset Group”.

“Lawyer Eimantas, who called me once, said that my debtor owned real estate, which he sold to a woman, but he arranged for the court to confiscate that property and now I would recover my debt,” recalled the emigrant. – Eimantas said that my debtor had sold his real estate for a higher price, so I will have to pay the difference. I transferred around 9 thousand to the “Turtuvos grupė” account several times. Eur “.

When in 2016 In October V. Bindokienė returned from vacation to Lithuania, A. Raziūnas, who was pretending to be an Eimantas lawyer, had already been released from Pravieniškės, so she offered to meet the woman who had to pay her money back. debtor for the land they sold him.

The meeting took place in Vilnius: the lawyer Eimantas, who trusted the client of the Press House “Turtuvos grupė”, warned that the woman is older, therefore, only they will be able to go to their house together, and the acquaintance who took her to the capital will have to wait in the car.

“Eimantas assured that now is the night and that the retiree is afraid of letting me enter the department, but that everything must be resolved as soon as possible so that he does not change his mind to give me my money,” said the victim. – Then Eimantas me jeep He took her to that woman, when we went to her house, she immediately introduced herself as Antanina Stafeckienė. Antanina covered the table with a bottle of wine, sandwiches, and coffee. Antanina began to justify that she does not have money at the moment, but she is selling her parcel, but she will not sell it until spring, because some European money is used there. She emphasized that she would definitely sell the land in the spring and settle accounts with me. “

During this meeting, Antanina also admitted that 100,000. The husband who did not return to the migrant is his relative.

“She asked me not to pressure her now, she promised to give me my money for her relative later,” he said.

According to her, the lawyer Eimantas, who left A. Stafeckienė’s apartment, asked to meet again in two days, promised to deliver important documents. They said nothing, but when they met, they handed 14 tickets to V. Bindokienė.

“They were all signed by Antanina,” said Eimantas, who wrote specifically in small amounts because he wanted the fees not “strangled”, said the victim, attorney Eimantas said the money would have to wait until 2017. April

The woman agreed, but soon returned to Britain and received a call from Eimantas again: “She said I still have to pay around 2,000. Eur because my debt is still lower than the price of the land. I transferred this money, and after a while Eimantas assured me that everything would be fine, and that if Antanina did not sell the land and did not return the money, I would start to press it. “

The emigrant no longer contacted lawyer Eimantas or the alleged family member of the debtor A. Stafeckiene – before April, V. Bindokienė received a call from the police. “Only then did I discover that I was deceived,” the woman, trapped in anger, did not hide her anger.

Derived the best scammer

In the fraud case, pre-trial investigation officials discovered that Eimantas, a Turtuvos Grupa attorney, offered plans to people who wanted to recover debts for land allegedly of greater value than the debt itself only to those whose debtors did not find or they saw that the client was rich and can be deceived. At that time, the debtors from whom the debt collection company had to recover debts were experiencing real hell. Delphi Jūratė Birutė Arbačiauskė from Vilnius, from whom an attempt was made to recover the debt, has already said how much horror, persecution and terror he experienced. The woman was in financial trouble at the time, so she was unable to return the money to her acquaintance.

“A man who introduced himself as a representative of the Lithuanian Criminal Police called me and said that he represented the Turuvos Group in legal matters,” the woman said. – The man declared that he is obliged to confiscate my property for debts, he boasted that he works with all Lithuanian law enforcement: courts, prosecutors, bailiffs, notaries. He mentioned that in every city there is a complete structure to catch and track people, supposedly they do it themselves and still hire other superficial ones, and he also said that all telephone conversations are heard and recorded. To be more convincing, he also said that his own people work in banks, which makes it very easy for him to verify my accounts. “

The woman, who had been persecuted for a long time, did not survive and otherwise raised less money to pay the debt, but so far she is afraid to think of A. Raziūnas, she even changed her place of residence out of fear. The woman came into sight of Turtuvos grupė and the victim did not become a coincidence: A. Raziūnas, who advertised the services of the Turtuvos grupė company on various channels, caught many victims who voluntarily contacted the man who had appeared on screens. giants.

The same happened to Algirdas Stundžiai, who was a victim of fraud, and who, when falling into the hands of a criminal convicted many times, brought the latter to J. B. Arbačiauskė.

During the Vilna police interrogation, the man told officers that in 2014, in the spring of this loan to said woman 38 thousand. Eur. The debt notes indicated that the money was loaned for one year.

Throughout the year, the borrower promised to repay the money, but did not.

Realizing that he would not get his money back, A. Stundžia heard from an acquaintance about the “Asset Group,” which is supposed to help him get his debt back quickly.

The woman answered the company’s phone call. She did not show up. The man, who wants to recover the debt, told him about his situation and told him that he would go to the company office. The interlocutors agreed on a moment.

At the scheduled time, A. Stundžia went to Kaunas and brought his debt documents to the “Turtuvos grupė” office in Laisvės alley. All the original debit notes were collected by the employee.

“On the night of the same day, a man who presented himself as a lawyer, Eimantas, called me and told me that he had found the biggest scammer, who already has many recovery cases,” recalled the victim.

The man who presented himself to Eimantas assured that Turtuvos grupė would represent his interests in court and asked to pay 1.4 thousand for the seizure of the debtor’s assets. Eur.

“I went to Kaunas again and was able to sign a legal services contract. At the same time I received an invoice in the amount of 1 740 Eur. I transferred the money to the Turtuvos Group through the bank ”, continued A. Stundžia.

Less than a week later, a man who visited the company’s Kaunas office again signed a lawsuit to award the debtor a debt. A warning to the debtor was also signed.

„Tiek įmonės direktorė A. Raziūnė, tiek Eimantas telefonu man paaiškino, kad tie dokumentai bus reikalingi, kad jie galėtų išsiųsti skolininkei po teismo sprendimo“, – prisiminė A. Stundžia.

Agnė kartu informavo, kad teismo žyminis mokestis – 2,8 tūkst. Eur, tačiau vyras jokios sąskaitos ar kvito dėl šios sumos sumokėjimo negavo. Moteris pažadėjo, kad mokestis bus grąžintas po teismo sprendimo, or visus dokumentus ir sąskaitą už šią sumą jis gaus paštu. Tą pačią dieną A. Stundžia vėl sulaukė skambučio iš Eimanto, kuris informavo, kad dokumentai perduoti į teismą.

Po kelių dienų vyras sulaukė skambučio iš skolininkės J. B. Arbačiauskės.

„Ji norėjo su manimi susitikti, bet pasakiau, kad išvažiuoju į kaimą. Eimantas man buvo kategoriškai uždraudęs bendrauti su skolininke “, – liudijo pareigūnams vyras.

Pareikalavo 1.8 tūkst. Eur skolininkei surasti

Po kurio laiko jis sulaukė ir registruotu paštu siųsto laiško his theism sprendimu. Apie laišką A. Stundžia informavo A. Raziūną, kuris pažadėjo apsilankyti su Agne Vilniuje ir kartu nuvykti pas antstolę.

„Tačiau sutartą dieną Agnė atvažiavo viena, nuvežė mane pas antstolę, sumokėjo už antstolės paslaugas“, – prisiminė nukentėjusysis.

Vėliau vyras vėl sulaukė Eimanto skambučio. „Turtuvos grupės“ atstovu prisistatantis vyras teigė, kad A. Stundžios skolininkė yra deklaravusi gyvenamąją vietą Kaune, o turto neturi, nors anksčiau buvo minėjęs, kad ji turi labai daug nekilnojamojo turto.

„Niekaip nesulaukiau vykdomojo rašto iš teismo, todėl pats paskambinau į teismą, paklausiau apie tai. Sekretorė paaiškino, kad turiu parašyti prašymą. Apie tai pasakiau Eimantu – jis labai supyko, sakė, kad „ką ten teisme miegančios darbuotojos nesąmones šneka“ ir patarė klausyti tik jo“, – prisiminė vyras.

Vis dėlto, po kurio laiko A. Stundžia sulaukė laiško dėl kreipimosi į teismą vykdomajam raštui išduoti. Laiškas atkeliavo iš „Turtuvos grupės“.

Pagaliau gavęs vykdomąjį raštą iš teismo nukentėjusysis paskambino Eimantui pasiteirauti, kodėl nevyksta skolos išieškojimas.

„Eimantas man pasakė, kad yra išvykęs į mokymus ir perskambins, tačiau taip ir neperskambino“, – tęsė vyras.

Skambučio iš A. Raziūno jis sulaukė tik dar po penkių dienų. Vyrui buvo liepta šiek tiek palaukti, nes skolininkė „yra dingusi ir ją reikia surasti kitais kanalais“.

Po tris mėnesius trūkusios tylos vėl suskambo A. Stundžios telefonas. Kitame ragelio gale kalbėjęs Eimantas pasakė, kad reikia sumokėti 1,8 tūkst. Eur dėl neva tolimesnių skolininkės paieškų. A. Stundžia paminėjo, kad savaitei išvyksta į kaimą.

Lygiai po tiek laiko vėl skambino nerimstantis Eimantas ir vėl reikalavo pinigų už neva teikiamas paslaugas. A. Stundžia patikino, kad pinigų neturi ir pats yra skolose, ieško pirkėjo savo žemės sklypui parduoti. Taip ir baigėsi vyro bendravimas su A. Raziūnu. Nuo paskutinio pokalbio jam nebepavyko susisiekti su save Eimantu vadinusiu vyru ir pabendrauti.

Tačiau 2016 m. gruodį su A. Stundžia susisiekė pati skolininkė J. B. Arbačiauskė.

„Ji pasakė, kad yra labai supykusi ant manęs, nes turėjo labai daug problemų, kad jai grasino Eimantas, kad jis liepė nebendrauti su manimi, jog ją kiekvienu metu seka, apie ją viską žino, kad, jei nevykdys Eimanto nurodymų, ją pakas“, – tikino nukentėjusysis.

Pats A. Raziūnas nepripažįsta, kad sukčiavo prieš A. Stundžią. Eimantu prisistatinėjęs šiuo metu Kaune teisiamas vyras tikino, kad iš vyro pinigus ėmė tik todėl, kad pastarasis nežinojo, kaip mokėti žyminius mokesčius, todėl esą kaip geras žmogus padėjo sutvarkyti šiuos reikalus.

Vietoje 12 tūkst. Lt liko su 100

Iki gyvenimo pabaigos akistatą su A. Raziūnu prisimins ir Dalija Vasiliauskienė. Ją taip pat savo kerais apžavėjo neva įtakingu ir profesionaliu teisininku prisistatęs vyras. Pamatęs, kad moteris iš paskutinių išgalių traukia ir jam duoda pinigus, vyras ją spaudė tol, kol vieną akimirką moteris suprato, kad yra žiauriai apgauta.

Moters liūdnai pasibaigusi istorija prasidėjo prieš keturiolika metų, kai ji pažįstamai paskolino 12 tūkst. Lt. Supratusi, kad skolos gražiuoju neatgaus, D. Vasiliauskienė žurnale „Savaitė“ aptiko bendrovės „Turtuvos grupė“ skelbimą. Pagalvojo, kad su profesionalų pagalba jai pavyks atgauti skolą iki senaties termino.

Moteris nuvyko į Kaune esančias bendrovės patalpas. Ten buvusiai darbuotojai pateikė visą informaciją, parodė skolos raštelį. Darbuotoja visus dokumentus atsišvietė ir iškart pakišo pasirašyti teisinių paslaugų sutartį. Jokių klastų neįtarusi D. Vasiliauskienė ją pasirašė ir išgirdo, kad informacija bus perduota įmonės teisininkui.

„Po kelių dienų man paskambino vyras, prisistatęs „Turtuvos grupės“ teisininku, vardo neminėjo. Pasakė, kad išanalizavo mano skolos raštelį ir jau rado skolininkę, kad su ja kalbėjo, kad ji gyvena Marijampolėje, pakeitusi pavardę, labai prasiskolinusi įvairiems žmonėms, minėjo, kad neturi jokio turto, tačiau turi žemės sklypą“, – prisiminė moteris.

Teisininku prisistatęs vyras užklausė, ar jos nedomintų žemės sklypas, bet pastaroji atsakė, kad „tokiame amžiuje jau tikrai nerūpi jokie žemės sklypai“.

Kitą dieną D. Vasiliauskienė sulaukė to paties vyro skambučio – jis pasakė, kad reikia apmokėti kreipimosi į teismą išlaidas. Nuvykusi į skolų išieškojimo įmonės patalpas ji gavo 500 Eur be PVM sąskaitą. Nieko nelaukdama skolą norėjusi atgauti moteris per banką sumokėjo daugiau nei 700 Eur.

Pinigų kaulijimas už neva teikiamas paslaugas tuo nesibaigė. Po kurio laiko sukčius vėl paskambino, sakydamas, kad reikia sumokėti žyminį mokestį.

„Paklausiau, kodėl man reikia tiek daug mokėti, o jis atsakė, jog viskas sugrįš, kai priteisiu pinigus iš skolininkės“, – prisiminė nukentėjusi.

Praėjo kelios savaitės. Dar vienas teisininko skambutis. Šįkart moteris išgirdo, kad teisininkas jai perves 100 Eur į sąskaitą, o jai reikės „Turtuvos grupei“ sumokėti 97 Eur.

„Dabar suprantu, kad taip perleidau savo skolą“, – konstatavo moteris.

D. Vasiliauskienė pasakojo, kad vyras nuolat pabrėždavo, jog dirba pagal kodeksus, juos žino mintinai, griežtai vadovaujasi tik įstatymais, turi priėjimą prie visų slaptų dokumentų. Kadangi jis nuolat tai kartodavo, rodydavo kodeksus, moteris pradėjo aklai juo pasitikėti.

„Jis man liepė niekam nepasakoti apie mano skolos išieškojimą. Net nežinau, kodėl juo taip tikėjau. Niekam iš namiškių nepasakojau“, – prisipažino ji.

Svečiuose pas turtingą ponią

Į A. Raziūno spąstus, kai už 100 Eur perleido didžiulę skolą „Turtuvos grupei“, D. Vasiliauskienė buvo įviliota šiam pasitelkus savo kerus. Jis patikino moteriškę, kad skolininkė apsimeta kvaila ir bus lengviau iš jos išieškoti pinigus, jei nukentėjusioji parduos savo skolą bendrovei. Neva perpirkus iš jos skolą, pačiai D. Vasiliauskienei nereikės vaikščioti po teismus. Iš teisininko pasakojimo ji suprato, kad bendrovė jai perves skolos sumą, o patys vėliau ją išieškos iš skolininkės.

Tačiau tik vėliau moteris suprato, kad iš tiesų pasirašinėdama „Turtuvos grupės“ pateiktus dokumentus ji savo didžiulę skolą bendrovei perleido vos už 100 Eur. Deja, šios sutarties nuorašo moteris negavo iki šios dienos.

Vieną 2016 m. spalio pradžios dieną, po ilgos tylos D. Vasiliauskienė vėl sulaukė skambučio iš teisininko. Šis informavo, kad reikia susitikti. Paminėjo, kad yra mieste, kur ji gyvena, ir užvažiuos pas ją į namus.

„Maždaug po dviejų valandų jis atvažiavo į namus, atsinešė diplomatą ir ištraukęs kažkokius popierius pasakė, kad mano skolininkė dar yra skolinga kitai moteriškei. Teisininkas pasakė, kad yra galimybė atgauti skolą, bet su viena sąlyga – aš turiu padengti savo skolininkės skolą tai moteriškei ir turiu sumokėti 3,66 tūkst. Eur“, – prisiminė apgautoji.

Nieko neįtardama D. Vasiliauskienė nudžiugo, kad atsirado galimybė atgauti savo skolą, tačiau neturėjo su savimi grynųjų pinigų. Pažadėjo jau kitą dieną nuvykti į bankomatą ir išimti pinigų.

Taip ir padarė – jau kitą rytą nuvykusi į banką išsigrynino 5 tūkst. Eur.

„Paskambinau teisininkui ir jis netrukus prie manęs priėjo. Greičiausiai buvo netoliese. Su jo automobiliu mes nuvykome į Vilnių pas moteriškę. Važiuojant teisininkas sakė, kad Antanina – labai įžymi, užsiima labdara, turi daug žemių, labai turtinga“, – liudijo pareigūnams D. Vasiliauskienė.

Įžengus į ponios butą Vilniuje savininkė prisistatė Antanina, pasigyrė, kad savo lėšomis pastatė bažnyčią Šiauliuose ir net popiežius atsiuntė padėkos raštą. Dar pridėjo, kad planuose ir senelių namų statyba.

Teisininku apsimetęs vyras pristatė, kad D. Vasiliauskienė – taip pat nukentėjusi nuo savo skolininkės. Viešnia perdavė vyrui 3,66 tūkst. Eur, o šis – iškart Antaninai. Neskaičiavusi pinigų ponia juos pasidėjo ant šalia buvusios spintelės. Teisininkas padiktavo tekstą skolos lapukui, tačiau pridėjo, kad reikia užrašyti didesnę sumą. Jie pradėjo tartis, kad Antaninai užteks 20 tūkst. Eur žemės sklypo pardavimui sutvarkyti.

„Kai išėjome iš buto, teisininkas pasakė, kad pamiršo raktelius ir grįžo pas Antaniną į butą. Turėjo dar tą dieną nuvežti pas notarą, bet esą tądien buvo penktadienis, jie dirba trumpiau, todėl paklausė, ar galėtų jis atsiųsti pinigus pavedimu. Veždamas mane namo jis pasakė, kad reikia sumokėti dar 480 Eur notarei. Paklausiau, kodėl taip brangiai. Ką jis man susakė atgal, nieko nesupratau. Padaviau dar 480 Eur“, – prisipažino apgauta moteriškė.

Nenustojo prašyti vis daugiau

Pamatęs, kad moteriškė laisva ranka dalina eurus, kelionės metu A. Raziūnas toliau bandė aiškintis, kiek būtų galima išpešti iš naivios D. Vasiliauskienės.

„Nei iš šio, nei iš to pasakė, kad reikia sumokėti žemės savininkui 40 tūkst. Eur. Atkirtau, kad tokių pinigų neturiu. Jis pradėjo mane psichologiškai spausti: klausė, kiek aš jų turiu, gal turiu kokio nekilnojamojo turto, kurį galėčiau parduoti. Spaudė mane tol, kol pasakiau, kad galiu duoti apie 20 tūkst. Eur, kuriuos kažkaip iš visur surinkčiau“, – tęsė nukentėjusioji.

Per savaitgalio dienas moteris suprato, kad pateko į spąstus – ją jau ne tik apgavo, bet ir toliau bando išvilioti pinigus. Ji nutarė rimtai pasikalbėti su „Turtuvos grupės“ teisininku – paaiškinti, kad nėra tokia kvaila ir naivi, kaip gali atrodyti. Ir kai pirmadienį D. Vasiliauskienė vėl susitiko su teisininku, iš karto šiam į akis rėžė, kad yra apgauta ir viskas įvyko neteisėtai. Pasak jos, A. Raziūnas pasimetė, tačiau greitai atsigavo ir pradėjo jai mosikuoti kodeksais. Jų pokalbis tęsėsi tol, kol moteriai vėl susisuko galva – D. Vasiliauskienė vėl sutiko atverti savo piniginę.

Jie tą pačią dieną nuvažiavo į banką, kartu nuėjo prie langelio, kur pasimetusi moteris pasiėmė dar 6 tūkst. Eur. Teisininku apsimetęs vyras paėmė banko darbuotojos išduotą lapelį dėl pinigų išgryninimo.

Sugrįžusi į namus moteris rado dar 900 Eur ir kartu su prieš tai nuimtais tūkstančiais, viską atidavė A. Raziūnui.

„Jis paskambino Antaninai ir paklausė, ar jai pradžiai užteks 8 tūkst. Eur. Ji atsakė, kad užteks. Teisininkas pažadėjo man paskolinti 1,1 tūkst. Eur, kad būtų reikiama suma. Pasakė, kad jo neapgaučiau ir grąžinčiau paskolintus pinigus“, – prisiminė nukentėjusioji.

Kitą dieną D. Vasiliauskienė teisininkui Eimantui atidavė iš vyro paimtus 1,1 tūkst. Eur. Už visą sumą ji gavo Antaninos skolos raštelį 8 tūkst. Eur skolai.

A. Raziūnui to neužteko. Jis ir toliau visais būdais norėjo iš patiklios moters ištraukti ką tik galima. Atiduodamas skolos raštelį jis pridėjo, kad kitą savaitę reikės važiuoti pas notarą, kur reikės dar 2 tūkst. Eur. Čia buvo paskutinis lašas D. Vasiliauskienės istorijoje, kai moteris pagaliau suprato, kad tikrai yra apgauta. Apie tai, kad ją kaip reikiant apšvarinęs vyras tikrai nėra nekaltas avinėlis, ji sužinojo tik iš žiniasklaidos, kuri pranešė apie sukčiaus machinacijas.

Sukčiavimu kaltinami sutuoktiniai dėl pinigų buvo pasiryžę bet kam. Taip teigė ne tik nuo Raziūnų nukentėję „Turtuvos grupės“ klientai, bet ir į didžiules aferas įveltas A. Raziūno brolis, kuris šiandien net vengia su juo bendrauti. Į spąstus pateko ir A. Raziūnės draugė, kai ši netikėtai nutarė iš jos išsireikalauti skolą. Kodėl šiandien ašaras lieja iš Amerikoje gyvenančios tetos JAV dolerių negavusi, bet išskirtinėmis „Turtuvos grupės“ teisininko galiomis tikėjusi kaunietė, o turtingą ponią vaizdavusi Antanina buvo iškeliavusi anapilin, bet netikėtai prisikėlė iš numirusiųjų?

Apie tai skaitykite kitoje „Skolų valdovo užburti“ dalyje.