[ad_1]
The crime was committed in the period of 2017. from the beginning of January to 2018. at the end of December at the SK farmers pig farm in the district of Radviliškis. V. Lapeškina, working as a foreman on said farm, being responsible for the foreign property entrusted to her – pigs raised on the farm, their receipt and issuance, at her workplace – on the farm, without drawing up any accounting document confirming the sale of pigs, falsifying real documents, deeds and consignment notes drawn up in accordance with them, consignment notes – and after using them, they sold pigs belonging to the farm – a total of 718 units.
V. Lapeškina did not transfer the more than 93 thousand euros received by the pigs sold to the farm, but took it to herself, thus appropriating the high-value stranger entrusted to her.
V. Lapeškina falsified the documents to hide that farmers sell pigs without accounting documents. In these falsified documents, V. Lapeškina recorded 389 more pigs downed than those that actually fell during 2017 and 2018.
V. Lapeškina used these forged documents by presenting them to an accountant who manages the accounts of the farm and has no knowledge of the criminal activity committed by her.
The defendant admitted that he had forged documents and embezzled money, she said that he had worked as a foreman for six years in the farm complex, he was responsible for everything in the complex: ventilation, flour and pigs brought from Latvia.
When the pigs were brought in from Latvia, she was responsible for raising them on 90 kilograms of bacon in 90 days. About 50 pigs brought in were said to be weak, they could no longer turn into bacon due to the delay, they were weak.
As a result, those pigs were separated into a room called a hospital. Pig buyers said they could take 5 pigs of this type each but asked not to write them down, she did.
V. Lapeškina stated that the man who came to the pigs offered to do so. V. Lapeškina admitted that, in fact, he sold more pigs and recorded less in the documents.
That difference in the number of pigs was recorded as dead. All the documents on the fallen pigs were signed by her and the veterinarian. The defendant said the doctor did not see the downed pigs, he trusted her.
The driver gave her money for those pigs, and she didn’t give that money, she took it from him. One company and V. Lapeškina paid for the allegedly fallen pigs with sausages, which they sold to their employees, because they had to give them to that company for work, for the production of sausages.
The defendant stated that some of these undocumented pigs were included in the drafts she took during a search at her home. He used the money he received for the pigs sold without accounting documents, bought a Mercedes Benz car for them, bought car tires, bought a garden house, fenced off a garden plot, dug a well, built and erected a greenhouse, bought something for your son and your grandchildren.
The woman opened with the intention of saving 100,000 euros and building a house for them. During the search, € 60,000 in cash was found in V. Lapeškina’s house, which was soon returned to the farmer.
The court that examined the case declared that, in addition to V. Lapeškina’s confession, his guilt was also proven by the testimony of witnesses, search protocols and the conclusion of a specialist. The defendant admitted his guilt, I’m sorry. The case was examined in an abbreviated examination of the evidence, so the sentence imposed must be reduced by one third.
When imposing the sentence, the court also took into account the fact that the defendant V. Lapeškina is already of retirement age, lives on an old-age pension, is in poor health and has taken all measures to compensate the damage caused.
The V. Lapeškinas court for the criminal acts committed. pleaded guilty and sentenced her to a final sentence of 2 years in prison.
A court requires a woman to work 200 hours without pay during the period of deprivation of liberty in health care, social service institutions or non-governmental organizations that care for the elderly, the disabled or other needy people.
This ruling has not entered into force and can be appealed to the Lithuanian Court of Appeal within 20 days, reports the Šiauliai Regional Court.
[ad_2]
