[ad_1]
The Vilnius City Municipality announced on Wednesday that the VPT submitted a proposal to conclude a peace agreement in response to the decision of the Vilnius Regional Court, which ruled that at the end of May the institution illegally suspended the signing of the concession contract. of the complex. The peace agreement proposes to abolish the obligation of the court to the VPT to reimburse the costs of the litigation incurred by the municipality – more than 6.5 thousand. euros, writes in a press release.
“The two state institutions that litigate in the courts are not interested in the citizens of the country. It does not produce any productive results. After evaluating how much time and resources have been invested in the development of the Multifunctional Complex project, and how important it is for the city of Vilnius, we offer the VPN the most optimal version of the outcome of this dispute. We hope that the VPT will choose this path, not the continuation of legal disputes and even greater losses for the residents of Vilnius ”, the report quotes Povilas Poderskis, director of the Municipal Administration of the city of Vilnius.
Photo by Rokas Lukoševičius / 15min / Povilas Poderskis
According to him, the municipal peace agreement with the VPT would mean that the process could be resumed, which was suspended in spring.
Meanwhile, the deputy director of the VPN Jovita Petkuvienė 15 minutes He stated that after examining the sentence and the reasons given, he saw reasons to appeal against him.
“The project is very large and very significant, it is not about litigation costs, but about real justice. At the moment, we are more inclined to appeal the decision to the court, “he said.
Photo by Sigismund Gedvila / 15min / Jovita Petkuvienė
According to J. Petkuvienė, in most cases the court only heard the arguments of the Vilnius municipality.
“Many of the arguments that we put together seem to have been ignored. We believe that it did not go all the way to the core. We understand that the procedure itself is really complicated, the very essence of the concession is complicated and it is certainly not a simple and ordinary case. But here we have arguments as to why what was said in our comments was not a deciding factor in the court’s decision. ” 15 minutes said the deputy head of VPN.
Photo by Rokas Lukoševičius / The most beautiful sports photos of the month: National Stadium
BNS announced on Monday that the Vilnius Regional Court had decided to outlaw the VPN’s order to end the national competition in stadiums.
According to the court, VPT did not have sufficient grounds to conclude that the project did not meet the characteristics of a concession and that the concession was illegal and unreasonable, and therefore to order the termination of the concession procedures.
The decision of the Vilnius Regional Court can be appealed to the Lithuanian Court of Appeal within 30 days.
VPT stated in May that the concession contract should have separated the state and municipal risks, but after changing the financing model of the project, they had all the risks, so the planned signing of agreements with Icor does not concern Axis Industries. it can be considered a concession contract.
In addition to the national stadium, the multi-purpose sports complex would be made up of 15 other sports facilities: athletics field, 6 basketball halls, 3 football training pitches, handball, gymnastics and boxing halls. A sports museum, community center, library, and kindergarten would also be built.
[ad_2]
