[ad_1]
The LFF announced the huge sanctions imposed on P. Malžinskas on Wednesday. The Federation’s Ethics Committee reportedly recorded a number of minor offenses and imposed severe penalties.
On Thursday, Father Malžinskas himself reacted to the LFF’s decision and questioned the composition and independence of the Ethics Committee. According to the record of P. Malžinskas, this LFF formation is closely related to the gray Lithuanian cardinal Arūnas Pukelis, who has a controversial reputation.
However, P. Malžinskas’ actions did not end there: he announced on Friday that he was retiring from the post of director of the Vilnius Region Football Union.
N. Kesmin also reacted to all this public warfare. Your willing thoughts Facebook, are as follows:
“Officially, Paulius Malžinskas has been without football for two years. Weightlifter Aurimas Didžbalis received the same punishment when he was first caught using doping.
What did P. Malžinskas do? Judging by the articles on violations listed in the official report of the Ethics Committee of the Lithuanian Football Federation, the director of the Vilnius Regional Football Association, having decided to resign, now probably violated the principles of neutrality and confidentiality , was disloyal to the LFF, slandered, delayed conflicts of interest, abused. And remembering that sometimes you forget to wear the LFF badge – a repeat offender.
Until the peak of full glory, they only took the machine gun from the cop. But maybe it would be banal, someone has already done it.
Among other things, P. Malžinskas violated Article 12.3 of the LFF Code of Ethics, which deals with general duties: he did not conduct himself with dignity and ethics and did not act in a completely trustworthy and honest manner. A wonderful piece of that Code of Ethics: I decided not to read Kurt Vonnegut, Mikhail Bulgakov or Gabriel García Márquez in the afternoons. Codes of ethics are much better.
One drafted by the LFF, for example, holds that the Code can be violated not only by acts or omissions, but also by attempts or attempts to commit violations. And the Ethics Committee can sanction following precedents or established practices.
Alio, following this logic and be it legal principles, in the Middle Ages, the righteous Catholics threw a witch into the fire. In this case, what matters is not what is written, but what decides. P.Malžinskas says, and this seems to be true, that the old demands of the LFF vice president, Arūnas Pukelis, decide.
Clearly, all codes of ethics are similar. Ethics do not have and cannot have objective criteria, so few people, like Harry Potter, have the power to turn shit into jam. Or vice versa.
But ethical standards must be judged by impartial people. Is that the case with LFF? Let’s say the story is silent for now. P. Malžinskas, wouldn’t you have drowned in this situation? Stand on the rails in front of the approaching locomotive; It will be reviewed.
And you could, Paul, be ethical. After all, let’s say, let’s say, Enrik the Doctor, or the Doctor, who’s going to get there now? – get out of the trunk without a phone or teeth, but still not attached to the Lead police. Here’s loyalty and confidentiality. You footballers have room to improve.
PS If I were the one who is required to comply with the LFF Code of Ethics, I would have violated almost every point of the requirements with this text, accumulating a five-digit amount of fines and probably disqualification for life. Thank goodness I don’t have to, but … Mr. Malžinskas, try hitting me when – or … yes? … – be allowed to return. “
[ad_2]
