[ad_1]
Very few countries in the world make as much effort as Sweden to protect their citizens from danger anytime, anywhere. In the wake of the pandemic, many residents felt well protected as usual. Sweden’s special way of dealing with the crisis without a “beard” was deemed safe and smart, according to Der Spiegel.
The elderly were only injected with morphine
But then the virus invaded the homes of the disabled and the elderly, in some of them the disease spread virtually out of control. That is why the death rate in Sweden is almost ten times higher than in neighboring Finland or Norway.
Testimonies and family research show that many Covid-19 victims were able to survive in Sweden.
“They didn’t try to save their lives,” quoted Anders Falne, a professor emeritus at the Karolinska Institute.
Even at the beginning of the pandemic, the head of the country. The nurse wrote in a report to the Ministry of Health that there may be a risk of “active euthanasia.” Anders Tegnell, Sweden’s chief architect of the fight against coronavirus, has consistently argued that all groups at risk, especially the elderly, will be protected from the virus.
Stockholm doctor Bengt Hildebrand barely managed to save his 78-year-old father, who was infected with Covid-19 in a nursing home: “He was prescribed morphine. He would have died silently to himself. “The doctor’s father eventually made it to the hospital, survived.
Rita Hemsen, 78, of Jevle Nursing Home, also received morphine and died because there were supposedly no openings at the hospital. A study on local television showed that relatives received false information: there were several vacancies in the wards of Javle hospitals.
Der Spiegel claims that these were not isolated cases, as confirmed by official data. Even at the height of the epidemic, there were enough vacant positions in the intensive care units of the country’s clinics, confirmed the Swedish Minister for Social Security, Lena Hallengren. However, this was presented as an achievement for the health system.
Plan what to keep and what not
The Swedish system has withstood the test of the coronavirus, albeit with great loss of life. At the same time, the development of a special plan in case of congestion in the health system could become a warning. What to treat first, what to treat next, and what not to treat at all? It was based on military practice to divide patients into several groups if the health system reached its limits. One of the criteria is the relative “biological age”, the second is the number of diseases.
A person whose biological age, according to doctors, reaches 60-70 years and who has at least two problems with the functioning of internal organs (such as the heart and liver) is not among the priority patients. Like the one who has a biological age of 70 to 80 years and has a disease of the internal organs. A person who does not have a serious illness, but whose biological age is over 80, does not have priorities either.
The Swedish clinics were not overcrowded, so this instruction may not have been used. However, for reasons that are not yet clear, it turns out that this cynical, war-friendly system has not been kept in the “drawer.”
Doctors testify that they were unable to properly treat some of the coronavirus patients they brought to the hospital. One of them told Dagens Nyheter: “We were forced to let people die, even though we knew they had a good chance of surviving in intensive care.” Another doctor also confirmed: “It was done several times a day.”
Those responsible deny the accusations. A study has been started whose results are not yet known.
In particular, estimates of nursing home patients were calculated. There, palliative care was often prescribed rather than referring patients to the clinic. And even in hospitals, doctors had to refrain from applying the proper treatment.
In Sweden, life expectancy has already reached 85 years for women and 81 years for men. However, the stereotype of non-existent ancestors still prevails in society.
“We live in a Peter Pen culture where youth is glorified and old age is seen as withering away and the beginning of dementia,” Swedish writer Markus Priftis enraged.
Sociological surveys show that Sweden is the country where older people are least valued. Only 20 percent. the population of the country respects people over 70, less than in many other countries surveyed.
The question of how long grandparents can live and when it is better for them to die is important not only during a coronavirus pandemic. It will be asked even more often in the future. After all, economic models of health care are not about anything else, but what to allocate medical resources to and what not.
The second wave of coronavirus in Europe is growing, with a record number of daily illnesses recorded last week in four Eastern European countries, including Ukraine or Poland. In Italy, masks are in demand everywhere again, and Paris hospitals may soon run out of places in intensive care units.
[ad_2]
