[ad_1]
A comment posted on your post said that next year the government plans to reduce the budget deficit of 8.8 percent. even up to 5%, and when expenses exceed income received, borrowing is required.
According to A. Kubilius, this means tightening your belts quite cruelly.
“From my personal memories, I can say that during the crisis of 2008-2012, our efforts to reduce the deficit by an average of 3% per year. it was very painful both for the people and for the politicians themselves ”, A. Kubilius shared his memories.
Sensitive citizens who read about belt-tightening were able to move their minds in late 2008, when conservatives who came to power had to deal with the financial crisis. Often this period does not evoke the best memories.
Is it wise to remind the Conservatives themselves before the second round?
I can’t understand how this can happen in general.
“It is difficult to even understand and explain how Gabrielis Landsbergis, who has been in hiding for so long between the first and second rounds, can be released with Andrius Kubilius and even with such headlines. It is really incomprehensible to me, because G. Landsbergis is already there. trigger and naturally it was hidden. But now to put A. Kubilius on the site, which is still associated with the crisis for all, with cut pensions and everything else, I find it difficult to explain, I cannot understand how this can happen in general “, 15 minutes stated R. Urbonaitė, a political scientist at Mykolas Romeris University.
Photo by Valdas Kopūstas / 15min / Rima Urbonaitė
She said she understood that she might be out of control what Liudvikas Andriulis, who is not even a member of the party, but it is difficult to explain why the strategy of not allowing ambiguous people in public has not been followed in this case.
However, the political scientist does not believe that this shows that the conservatives no longer follow the strategy of trying to get more popular people on the air, demonstratively rejecting more serious confrontations, saying that there is no need to vote against, that there is no need to vote, there is a need for respect.
“In other words, they tried in every possible way to get rid of the arrogant conservative labels. Now, after the first round, there were equally very restrained speeches at first, with no joy. However, it seems to me that that inner joy burst out of the worse when reckless actions and speeches arise, ”he said.
The policy expert added that the drop could be due to the fact that conservatives already feel the taste of power.
“And it’s hard to control those emotions, it’s hard not to rejoice and turn to yourself and remind yourself that, wait, there’s another round, everything can still be there. However, now that mathematics is quite favorable … It is not controlling emotions, not lack of strategy ”, emphasized R. Urbonaitė.
Controlling emotions, he said, is especially notable on Facebook, where conservatives can’t resist the urge to get involved in pointless disputes.
“They must remember that Facebook is also a public space and must be controlled. They do not understand that the moderation they declare must be maintained on all points, not that Ingrida Šimonytė comes out to various debates and says that everything is calm, we keep looking, we are counting, we are not making hasty negotiations and decisions, but at the same time. during which you open Facebook, and there – screams and emotions. Therefore, it is difficult to understand. This is an uncontrollable pre-joy, although I think it is too early to shoot champagne, ”commented R. Urbonaitė.
He added that A. Kubilius himself cannot be called a politician who does not control his emotions, so it is difficult to say why what happened happened.
R.Karbauskis is already intimidating A.Kubilius
R. Karbilius, the leader of the “peasants,” soon reacted to A. Kubilius’ comment, sharing economist Nerijus Mačiulis’s assessment that no matter who forms the government, he will not be forced to tighten any fiscal belts.
“The deliberations of A. Kubilius question both the suitability of conservatives to evaluate Lithuania in the world context and their ability to understand economic processes. Or maybe they see Lithuania only as a state of milking slavery, where everything can be taken away from people by tightening their belts, as A. Kubilius promised yesterday, ”wrote R. Karbauskis on his Facebook account.
A. Kubilius: no one will scare those who read and understand what is written
A. Kubilius himself, speaking with 15 minutes, made it clear that my comment did not regret it.
According to him, R. Karbauskis misinterprets his text.
“I do not promise to tighten my belt or anything else. I am just saying that the figures included in the project prepared by Saulius Skvernelis and Vilius Šapokas indicate that the deficit will be reduced by 9% this year.” I think the 5% planned for next year may be quite painful, “he said.
Photo by Julius Kalinskas / 15min / Ramūnas Karbauskis
A. Kubilius emphasized that Minister V.Šapoka also talks about it, saying that it means that all public sector financing will have to be frozen, debt management will have to be administered and so on.
But he is trying to say that the conservatives are coming, that A. Kubilius is coming and he is tightening his belt.
“That’s all I wanted to say – see, this is a budget project for the ‘peasants’ led by R. Karbauskis. That it will not be sweet and that life will not be, as it were, covered with flowers, and that is all. And if he says no, it won’t be, that’s great, let him tell you how to reduce that deficit painlessly. But he is trying to say that the conservatives are coming, that A. Kubilius is coming and he is tightening his belt. In my opinion, this is already in the budget. Maybe I’m wrong, maybe the economists explain that the deficit can be reduced without pain, “said the politician.
Isn’t A. Kubilius afraid that he might scare the voters?
According to him, whoever reads and understands what is written will not scare anyone.
“And that R. Karbauskis is trying to scare me with all kinds of trinkets before the second round, this is not news here. He did this for four years and it led to failure in the first round. He’s trying to continue the same thing, I don’t have much to say. “Whether he wrote or not, he still would have tried to intimidate,” the conservative politician is convinced.
[ad_2]
