The Supreme Court will issue a judgment in the case of abuse of Mr. Gineikaitė



[ad_1]

In his complaint, Mr. Gineikaitė requested the nullity of the parts of the judgments of the courts of both instances on their actions and the dismissal of the case, either due to the entry into force of the judicial decision on the same facts, or after recognizing it as the perpetrator of a crime or offense.

In another case, it is requested to reduce the part of the fine that was imposed to the maximum amount of 3.7 thousand imposed on the other defendant, Salomėja Skersienė. EUR fines. The abolition of the measure of criminal sanction – deprivation of public rights is also requested, when D. Gineikaitė is prohibited from being appointed or elected to a managerial position for two years.

The Court of First Instance had awarded Mr. Gineikaitė 20.7 thousand LTL. The court of appeal reduced it to 13.2 thousand euros. euros.

Gediminas Abeciūnas, former director of the then Kaunas Clinical Hospital, Kastytis Grigonis, his former deputy, as well as Artūras Šulnius, a doctor at this hospital, and S.Skersienė, a nurse, request the annulment of the sentences of both courts and the rescission of the case in their against.

G.Abeciūnas was fined 13.1 thousand. EUR fine, K. Grigonis – 11,2 thousand. a fine of EUR. They are also prohibited from managing health care facilities for two years.

6.4 thousand were allocated to A.Šulnis. EUR and S.Skersienė – 3.7 thousand. a fine of EUR.

These fines were not modified by the Court of Appeal.

D. Gineikaitė and the then hospital directors and their doctors were convicted of mistreatment, when in 2015, after the accident, D. Gineikaitė’s blood sample was falsified in order not to detect intoxication.

The then NJT director was found to have an average drunkenness of 1.69 per thousand after the accident. The court subsequently found her guilty, fined her, and disqualified her from driving for several years.

Two of her blood samples were taken at the hospital, the second the next day, and the nurse exchanged them.

A.Šulnius admitted in court that she had asked the nurse to take a second blood sample, and S.Skersienė said that she had decided to exchange them herself. The other defendants did not fully admit their guilt in court.



[ad_2]