[ad_1]
An online acquaintance of a Klaipėda resident with a girl who was three years younger and less than sixteen years old ended up in a criminal case signs of rape or coercion and the production and possession of videos of pornographic content.
After analyzing the data of the criminal case, the judges decided to impose a fine of 22 MGL (1,100 euros) and a year in prison on the young man who was brought to justice, forcing him to continue his studies or start working and staying at the home of 23 to 6 in the morning.
In addition, the court sentenced the victim to 3,000. Compensation for moral damages and 327 euros for the Health Insurance Fund for the treatment of a minor.
According to the case data, it was established that on January 23 last year, a fifteen-year-old boy from an orphanage was presented and operated on at Klaipėda Hospital for genital injury. She admitted to the doctors that she voluntarily had sex with a slightly older boy, but he was too rude and what happened happened.
Doctors were obliged to inform the police about the injuries sustained by the minor; On the same day, only an eighteen-year-old who lived with his mother was arrested. Investigators who examined his cell phone immediately found evidence of the crime: The man had filmed sex with a fifteen-year-old.
Two more videos taken two years ago were also seen on his phone, filming how a 16-year-old boy was having an oral relationship with a partner at the time.
The police officers who started the pre-trial investigation discovered that the Klaipėda resident had met the fifteen-year-old on the social network Facebook, he was the first to convince the teenager. When he found out that he was fifteen, the boy decided to hide his true age, stating that he was seventeen.
For three days, they communicated virtually; After reviewing the content of the correspondence, officials discovered that the boy constantly wrote and sent messages to the teenager that were obscene and vulgar about how to satisfy his sexual passion through oral, anal and other physical contact. Also, the boy sent many SMS messages to the girl, she wondered if the minor had sex. And she didn’t even try to hide anything: she admitted that she had already lost her virginity, that she had had sex with more than one man, and also sent them her nude photos more than once.
The communication led the eighteen-year-old, a minor who at the time was living in an orphanage (her mother is dead and her father constantly abuses alcohol), to meet as soon as possible and, as he himself wrote, to ” do what”.
When the teenager dared to meet, the eighteen-year-old invited her to her home. And this is where the minor was subsequently transferred from the nursing home to the hospital, and police officers launched a pre-trial investigation. But the young man did not expect things to be so bad: when he left the house, the teenager gave him a mobile phone, hoping that she would keep in touch with him in the future and send him her intimate photos and videos.
Prosecutors who also had sex with a minor were also accused by prosecutors of abusing a minor when he sent various vulgar messages to the minor, causing him to become interested in sex early on. However, after analyzing the criminal case, the judges found that the adolescent had already had sexual experience and that the defendant’s actions “were not intended to incite premature interest in sexual relations, but to tempt them.”
“The victim kept in contact with me on purpose and understood the purpose of the meeting,” the 18-year-old said. Even though he was only 15, he was already sexually mature. “
He also pointed out that he had come of age during sexual intercourse only a month ago, so it would be wrong and inappropriate to assess his behavior and maturity as a full adult using the criteria of an adult.
His allegations were not ignored by the prosecutors who supported the prosecution or by the judges who tried the criminal case; They pointed out that there was no evidence in the case that the 18-year-old defendant was socially and spiritually equivalent to maturity, it would not coincide with his age.
“There is also no evidence in the record that the spiritual maturity of the victim matches the data and the maturity of the minor,” the court said. – The victim had an early traumatic experience of interpersonal relationships: loss of mother, alcohol abuse by father. Due to the lack of experience in a consistent, attached and stable relationship with the adult, the victim tends to have confidence, difficulty in predicting and evaluating the possible consequences of their behavior ”.
According to the judges, the defendant knew that the teenager lived in a children’s home, as he had indicated in his Facebook account, at that time he himself lied to the minor that he was also a minor – 17 years old. Yes, according to the court, the man was trying to tame a minor. And without accidentally persuading a fifteen-year-old to have sex, he wrote to this: “Well or minors can do it if they don’t tell anyone. “
The boy lied to the teenager telling him that he had not had sex before and asked him not to tell anyone that she was having sex with him.
“Said correspondence confirms that his defendant concealed his true age, his sexual experience in order to have sex with the victim,” the criminal court said, noting that the age difference between the defendant and the victim was almost 3 years, and that his physical and mental maturity the differences cannot be considered small.
[ad_2]
