[ad_1]
– Many Western politicians publicly criticize the President of Belarus, Aliaksandr Lukashenko, for not talking to the opposition and “not seeking dialogue” … And where can you find that opposition? Who to talk to And about what?
– There is really no person in Belarus who can really assume the role of national leader. Sviatlan Cichanouskaya’s attempts to say that she is that leader, just childish … A leader who fights for the ideals of his country must have a clear understanding of what he wants to do and what to achieve. When S.Cichanouskaya asks who owns Crimea, she is silent, and when she tries to hear about the imaginary future of Belarus (with Russia or not), she is even more silent … The main function of a leader is to show its people the future direction of the state. As long as Belarus has no such leader, it is neither for the West nor for itself. Batkai There really won’t be anyone to talk to … And not just them. Simply, until then, the Belarusian nation will become the leader of various Western and Russian financial groups. A couple of them, clearly pro-Russian leaders, Batka he’s incarcerated, and the pro-Western commanders didn’t get there this time … The situation here is very simple. The situation for Lithuanian politicians, let’s say, is much more complicated, after dragging 50 thousand people to Medininkai and not finding a single hand there that could press …
– Well, don’t say, we even sent balloons to Belarus …
– Yes. But it was a demonstrative propaganda campaign that did not bring more than an additional conflict in the relations between Lithuania and Belarus.
– So what to do with all this revolution? Is it over or will it continue?
– Those who imagined that they were involved in the revolutionary process or, like some of our politicians, tried to heat up a foreign revolutionary fire and fix its abrasions in the run-up to the elections, must take responsibility for the last 20 years both at the level state and party. Lithuania did nothing to help Belarus develop political leaders. Leaders who can act today and take responsibility for what ordinary people have started, hated for the sense of absurdity they have had to live with for many years. Is the revolution over? I do not think so. This revolution will largely depend on the processes that have already started, are happening, growing and increasing in Russia. What we see today in Bashkortostan, defending the Holy Mountain, or in Khabarovsk, fighting for our self-esteem, is simply turning into completely different political demands and levels of protest before our eyes: from “free the governor” to “rebuilding the Republic of the Far East ”… These processes, starting spontaneously in one place or another, are spreading throughout Russia. I think that one of the trigger mechanisms will be the next Russian municipal elections.
– In this context, the story of the poisoning of Alexei Navaln is also interesting. Will the West continue to communicate “pragmatically” with the main poison?
– I do not consider A. Navalno an independent opposition policy. All he did was cooperate with one of Russia’s pro-government and competitor groups and represent their interests. It seems to have suffered in the fight against these Kremlin towers. Will Westerners continue to pursue pragmatic policies? Of course. As in the aftermath of the Skripal or Litvinenko poisoning in England, as well as in the shootings of Chechen leaders in Germany, as well as in the run-up to the US elections or the Brexit process, as well as after the penetration of the databases Westerners, “pragmatism” has always prevailed. We must recognize that not only Belarus does not have leaders. The “leaders” of the Western world, at best, only bear the burden entrusted to them within their own country, but they are not leaders capable of uniting Europe. We have neither Churchill nor De Gaulle nor Roosevelt scale personalities that are exceptionally needed today. Putin therefore hopes that the coming storm will not be very strong and that he will maintain his position.
– Unexpectedly, however, the West has managed to do quite a bit of damage to the Russians these days: Moscow has recently raised concerns about the EU’s plans to introduce a carbon tax on imports from non-EU countries; such a move by Brussels would affect Russia, which relies on energy trading. Was it made specifically or did it come about by accident?
– Whatever the “liquid” leaders of the Western world, but there is an agreement to end the Putin clique … Despite Tramp’s isolationism and avoidance of interfering in European affairs, this is a joint project of Europe , The United States and some Asian countries, and a loop, thrown at the neck of Russia, rushes. Right now, neither the hideous rockets nor any other intimidation is taking effect, budget revenues are falling, energy prices are falling, the dissatisfaction of the people in Russia is growing and it can be said that the protest electorate has reached maturity. This fall and the New Year period in Russia will be quite turbulent.
– This week a clash between Russian and American troops took place in Syria, and several American soldiers were injured in the incident. Doesn’t it seem like the first time?
– From what I count, this is the sixth confrontation between the US and Russian army. This shows that the soldiers on both sides are clearly ideologically motivated, there is great hostility that sooner or later will erupt into an armed conflict. If the splinters fall on the embers, sooner or later they will start to burn. Now we have this situation in Syria. Russia’s penetration of cheap oil countries and regions is not going to be a good thing: it would cost a couple of dollars to extract a barrel of oil in Libya or Syria, and Russia would have to pay tens of dollars for the same. Therefore, this infiltration into areas that are profitable in this time of famine is certainly not without the US response. Today he ended up with a bruised nose, and tomorrow he will end up with body bags … I can’t say anything good here.
– Unrest and vandalism resumed in the US state of Wisconsin, under a new pretext to “fight for the rights of blacks” when a black man who did not follow police instructions was shot and killed. Is it a random or organized phenomenon outside the country?
– The elections are approaching and it is natural that the Democratic Party has an interest in maintaining tensions that have already weakened significantly. We can clearly see two parties with centuries of tradition fighting for power in the United States. It’s pretty clear here: Loss of power for Democrats equals death, and the same can be said for Tramp and his entourage. So in the run-up to the elections, it is very important to preserve this tension and conflict, so both blacks will be shot regularly and store windows will be smashed. Of course, when the elections are over and the situation stabilizes, this showcase show will end.
– Well, what would be more useful for us: Tramp’s win or Joe Biden’s?
– In the short term, a possible article, there will be no great difference. And in the long run, I’d bet on Tramp. Anyway, we have already seen the Democratic Party with Barack Obama at the forefront of politics during the Ukraine crisis. And none other than Obama, his inactive and absurd policies allowed the occupation of Crimea and the fighting in Donbass, and did not help the Ukrainian government at the right time at all. And it was only when D. Tramp received power that the necessary solutions were moved, Ukraine was armed. Despite all the expressions of love between Tramp and Putin, the pressure on the Kremlin took real forms, both at the level of Congress and at the level of the State Department and the president’s own administration. And all this is crowned by the positive decisions taken by D. Tramp himself with regard to Russia. Looking at our situation, I think that in the event of a crisis, we would get more real help from Mr. Tramp than from the trembling, top-down Democrats who are protecting their Chinese assets …
[ad_2]
