[ad_1]
Sergejus Lemziakovas, head of the Public Order Division of the Kaunas District Municipality, appeared in court. He is accused of violating public order in the course of his work, seriously disturbing the health of the person with whom he has a conflict and destroying his property.
Guilt is not admitted
The conflict was widely reported in the media after the Police Department reported it. However, how it all ended after a six-month pre-trial investigation was silenced.
This case, in which S. Lemziakov was accused of committing three crimes in 16 minutes, was quietly transferred to the Kaunas District Court, a media secret.
Lemziakov, 51, who ran the Garliava police station before ending his career in the police force, is accused of behaving arrogantly on the Raudondvaris highway with strangers on the morning of 14 May last year: during an injured driving conflict, he then turned the victim onto the hood and squeezed his neck with one hand and tried to strike with the other, that is, disrupting public order, causing minor health problems, and damaging foreign property by folding the hood.
After hearing this accusation in court, Lemziakov did not admit his guilt. And he said he would testify only after interviewing all participants in the process.
Lemziakov claimed to have held a knee eagle with a knife to cut his seat belts after the accident, even though he had a firearm issued for self-defense at the time.
Victim version
The 27-year-old victim, declaring her place of residence in the Kaunas district municipality, claimed that the incident occurred while changing lanes at a crossroads when a hasty defendant tried to avoid it. And having done so, he stopped, stopping all traffic. The victim said she realized she needed to stop too. And when he did that and approached the defendant, he told him that he would lose the right to drive the car because everything was filmed.
According to the victim, the defendant did not appear or say anything about his duties. After his statement, he turned around and left. The victim said he followed him because he wanted to see a video recording the defendant was referring to. However, leaning against this car, the defendant slapped him on the chin with his hand. And in uncensored words he said to start from here. And then he pushed. According to the victim, while they were face to face, he suddenly felt a stab in his thigh and saw blood flow. Then he passed out. And when he recovered after a while, he saw a defendant who had been told that he also had a video recorder in his car next to his Audi A4.
Ask for a five-digit reward
According to the victim, attacking the defendant, who was about to get into his car, he grabbed it and turned it on the Audi engine cover. And then he started to drown.
After his release, the victim said that he had started to stop passing cars. When one stopped and his driver got in to help him, the defendant told him to drive, claiming that nothing had happened.
The victim then leaned into the nearby store. And soon the sirens of rushing police cars were also heard, which he believed had been summoned by witnesses to the incident.
The victim asks that S. Lemziakov be ordered 13 thousand. EUR moral consideration. And € 100 for the puncture of the bonnet of his Audi, since the insurance company had already paid him the remaining € 271 for damage to the car.
According to the victim, the defendant did not appear or say anything about his duties.
Demand version
It is not clear how S. Lemziakov will be sued in court. However, as a result of the outcry after the Police Department denounced the incident, he told the media that he had later immobilized a knee eagle, that he himself caused the conflict and behaved aggressively, which led him to defend himself against he.
According to S. Lemziakov at the time, this incident occurred while he was running to Raudondvaris to work this morning on a car belonging to the Kaunas district municipality marked with special posters.
It all started with an unexpected turn against Audi without showing a turn, which began to dive between cars, driving in a hooligan way and putting in danger. He began filming these violations with a video recorder in a company car. Seeing his car marked and realizing that he was being filmed, the highway hooligan began to display obscene gestures and drive even more dangerous, leading to congestion. Lemziakov said he then stopped and waited for the road eagle to pass because he had already passed it. However, he approached his car. According to S. Lemziakov, he then approached the road hooligan, introduced himself and said that he had recorded his violations and would hand over the material to the police. Although at first she did not pretend to have any contact with him.
He also had a gun
According to S. Lemziakov, after his words about the filmed rapes, a highway hooligan jumped out of his car and tried to start the video recorder in his official car.
When the fight started, Lemziakov said that he had noticed that his opponent was searching his pockets for something. And he said that he had told him that he had the right to defend himself and warned him that if he did not stop, he would be hurt. The opponent replied that there was no need to intimidate him and continued to behave aggressively.
According to S. Lemziakov, he finally stabbed a knee with a knife he was holding in his hand, the purpose of which is to cut the seat belts after the accident. And holding this in his hand at the time as a deterrent. And stabbed him in the thigh, so that it wouldn’t hurt too much, but the opponent who was in pain would calm down.
Lemziakov later said that he called an ambulance and reported the incident to police. At the time, he had a firearm handed over with him and in self-defense. However, its use was not even considered.
In presenting this version of S. Lemziakov, it was alleged that a road hooligan he had repressed had already been administratively punished thirteen times.
Eloquent questions
Lemziakov’s case was taken to court after police asked witnesses to respond to the incident. There are 38 of them in the present case.
The case about the quarantine in the Kaunas District Court had been stalled for more than seven months, and now an unknown break will be announced.
On Tuesday, in the case of S. Lemziakov, who has been in quarantine at the Kaunas District Court for more than seven months, an unknown break will be announced. The judge Liuba Kymantienining who examined it complied with the request of S. Lemziakov’s lawyer to appoint an expert in the examination of the video recording technology of the victim’s car.
Among the various questions that will be asked of the digital information expert at the Lithuanian Forensic Science Center is not only a request to improve image quality, but also whether individual files can be deleted and reordered, whether they were deleted and whether the video recorder could turn off automatically.
[ad_2]
