Kirsty forgives the rules of Elliott’s diversity. The other cheerful

And the scar for the alkaline response to the film academy’s new diversity and content needs … Kirsty Alley.

The actress sparked an outcry on Twitter on Tuesday after the academy announced updated standards for Best-Picture nominees with the aim of creating more opportunities in Hollywood for five-list groups. Elle then deleted her original tweet, called the new guide, “Defamation of Artists Everywhere.”

“[C]You have an idea to tell Picasso what should be in his … paintings, “Eli wrote in a tweet, which has become immortal in the screenshot.” You people have lost your mind. Control the artists, control the personal thought. Oscar Orwell. “

After the haphazard reaction, Ale removed and expanded her comments, which she called “poor analogy” or “misrepresented my point of view.” The Emmy winner added that it is “100% behind diversity inclusion and tolerance” but “opposes the percentage of mental arbitrators related to hiring humans in any business.”

“I’ve been at the Motion Picture Academy for 40 years,” Elle continued in a subsequent tweet. “UnitBrill expresses the freedom of artistry expressed by Academy Movies. The new rules for qualifying for ‘Best Picture’ are dictatorial .. Anti Artist .. Hollywood You are swinging while you are fooling yourself. “

At one point, she requested that Ava Duverne “explore my record of diversity and content in everything she has made during her lifetime and during my lifetime,” then responding to Eleanor’s complaints by trailblazing director Denzel and Washington with a GIF from Washington.

“I am not perfect but have fought for human and civil rights for 50 years,” Elle continued. “I’m not just ordering, prerequisite 4 is impossible for the‘ police ’quota as the‘ best ’picture. …

“I don’t feel the need to defend myself, but sometimes it’s important to take note of your own history. Especially since people are not aware of our track records. Understanding is my goal. Understanding leads to change. “

On Tuesday, the Film Academy unveiled new requirements, stating that to be eligible for the best picture, a film needs to meet at least two criteria in four categories, including women, people of color, LGBTQ + people and people with disabilities. And unlike Eli, some Hollywood personalities hailed the initiative as the beginning of a more representative industry.

“This is another step towards equity and inclusion, but we are far from it,” tweeted activist April Rain, who launched the #OscarsWhite campaign in 2015 to inspire deeper conversations about representation. Issue or use hashtags. This is progress for marginalized communities, which is won by marginalized communities. We win together.

“As I’ve said for a long time, the real change is yet to come on the page, and with the studio that gave the green light to those films. The goal is to ensure that more inclusive films are made that are / are / called by traditionally represented communities; The awards come after many. ”

Many also expressed concern about the ease with which producers – and potential ducks – could be able to meet the criteria, without making a serious effort to diversify their projects.

“This is definitely progress but it’s still not enough unless you need one in each category,” tweeted “Good Trouble” author Ashley Perez. “There are loopholes. However I hope this will at least make the studio start thinking about who is telling the stories and why. “

The academy’s diversity and inclusion requirements for the best picture will be implemented in 2024.